On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:19:24 +0100
Benoit Rouits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, Vladimir Mosgalin a écrit :
That's the main reason why I asked - I heard that people can hear
22khz or about that when they are
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Bill Unruh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:19:24 +0100
Benoit Rouits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, Vladimir Mosgalin a écrit :
That's the main
Hi Bill Unruh!
On 2007.11.24 at 10:11:16 -0800, Bill Unruh wrote next:
Thank you for all your responses!
That is quite normal It is in fact good hearing (although many kids can
hear up to 22-25 kHz). And it will get worse, especially if you like
That's the main reason why I asked - I heard
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Hi Bill Unruh!
On 2007.11.24 at 10:11:16 -0800, Bill Unruh wrote next:
Thank you for all your responses!
That is quite normal It is in fact good hearing (although many kids can
hear up to 22-25 kHz). And it will get worse, especially if you
Hi Gene Heskett!
On 2007.11.23 at 11:56:56 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote next:
Anyway, in analog mode, are you sure there is no option to switch off
bandwidth filter?
No one in their right mind would want to do that as the aliasing would drive
you up a wall. The other delay distortions the
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:49:30 +0300
Vladimir Mosgalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS a bit of OT: I'm 24, and I barely hear 18khz (in headphones), unless
it's VERY loud - I can hear only up to 17500-17800 clearly at average
volume level. Is there something wrong with my ears or it should be like
On 24-11-07 11:49, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
PS a bit of OT: I'm 24, and I barely hear 18khz (in headphones), unless
it's VERY loud - I can hear only up to 17500-17800 clearly at average
volume level. Is there something wrong with my ears or it should be like
this?
You're perfectly fine.
On Saturday 24 November 2007, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Hi Gene Heskett!
On 2007.11.23 at 11:56:56 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote next:
Anyway, in analog mode, are you sure there is no option to switch off
bandwidth filter?
No one in their right mind would want to do that as the aliasing would
Paolo Saggese wrote:
On Thursday 22 November 2007 15:25, you wrote:
This is a valid wish, isn't it? And at least the
M-Audio Audiphile cards can sync themselves to the S/PDIF In clock.
They can, but the word clock is used only as a sample clock. It will
not reduce the amount of jitter of
Hi Darrell Bellerive!
On 2007.11.22 at 17:54:19 -0800, Darrell Bellerive wrote next:
I have never been happy with this card. While it works okay for playing basic
sound, getting it to do anything more sophisticated is pure black magic. For
example, I have never gotten full duplex to work.
Paolo Saggese wrote:
Of course I plan to use the PC only to provide a bitperfect
(exact copy of the original media, normally CD) digital stream
to an external DAC.
As you probably know better than me, the one major known problem
when you strive for the highest possible quality in digital
On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
* cabable of bitperfect (pass through) operation at CD standard
16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions and
sample rates such as 16/48, 24/48, 24/96 and 24/192).
16/44.1 is basic
Rene Herman wrote:
On 22-11-07 11:10, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
An SPDIF input _always_ derives its clock from its signal.
Besides, the clock for the actual DAC has to be a multiple of the bit
clock anyway, so there must be a PLL to derive the DAC's clock from the
input signual, i.e., the
Rene Herman wrote:
On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
* cabable of bitperfect (pass through) operation at CD standard
16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions and
sample rates such as 16/48, 24/48, 24/96 and
On 22-11-07 15:25, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
On 21-11-07 20:33, Paolo Saggese wrote:
Thus, I would need a sound card which must be:
* cabable of bitperfect (pass through) operation at CD standard
16bit/44.1KHz (as well as, possibly, also at higher resolutions and
sample
Hi everybody,
first of all, I'd like to thank you all so much for the prompt
and many replies I've got... Wow, they came in faster then I was
able to read! :-)
(there's still someone claiming that Linux has no support?! :-)
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 22:19, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On 22-11-07 20:49, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Just a random thought on jitter - if you like music recorded originally
before the digital era - don't bother.
I.e. analog tape recorder wow and flutter
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow_and_flutter )
is much higher than digital jitter.
Just a random thought on jitter - if you like music recorded originally
before the digital era - don't bother.
I.e. analog tape recorder wow and flutter
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow_and_flutter )
is much higher than digital jitter.
And that wow and flutter is already in the now digital
On Thursday 22 November 2007 11:39, Rene Herman wrote:
I suppose your external DAC has no actual WordClock (BNC connection) output?
indeed, it does not. As it does not have an SPDIF output, either...
but I'm a DIY guy (with an EE degree...) and can add whatever output
I need or even build a
On 22-11-07 20:38, Paolo Saggese wrote:
On Thursday 22 November 2007 11:39, Rene Herman wrote:
I suppose your external DAC has no actual WordClock (BNC connection) output?
indeed, it does not. As it does not have an SPDIF output, either...
but I'm a DIY guy (with an EE degree...) and
Hi Sergei Steshenko!
On 2007.11.21 at 23:24:35 +0200, Sergei Steshenko wrote next:
Regarding soundcard and syncrhonization - M-Audio Revolution 7.1, and
quite possibly M-Audio Revolution allow you to use external clock
source.
I meant M-Audio Revolution 7.1, and quite possibly
On 22-11-07 19:44, Paolo Saggese wrote:
[OT on]
In fact, unfortunately cdparanoia is not (or perhaps no
longer) good enough to do perfect DAE.
Over the course of ripping 735 CDs now to my harddrive with cdparanoia, I
have found that all's well as long as cdparanoia leaves nothing but spaces
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 23:49, Bill Unruh wrote:
The clock jitter tends to be in the ppm range. This means that the
frequency jitter is very low (if I believe the ppm then at the level of
-120dB)
which is completely inaudible. My cheap Transit card reliably gives me noise
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:00:29 +0100
Paolo Saggese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
If the digital audio folks have had a lesser simplistic approach in
the first place, we would not have had to wait some 20 years before
gettin' a barely acceptabe sound out of a CD...
[snip]
In a sense, one
On 22-11-07 22:00, Paolo Saggese wrote:
(what's worse is that, nevertheless, even now a good analogue system can
still sound MUCH better than any CD: it actually takes a good SACD or
DVD-A system to come close to the good old LP when it comes to the real
perceived audio quality!)
If we're
Hi everybody,
I have a question for you guys.
(I'm new to this list and hope this is the right place to ask
and not an FAQ... I've tried to search to see if this question
had been answered previously, but I have been not able to find
what I was looking for).
I'm thinking about using a
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:33:39 +0100
Paolo Saggese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a question for you guys.
(I'm new to this list and hope this is the right place to ask
and not an FAQ... I've tried to search to see if this question
had been answered previously, but I have
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:19:58 +0200
Sergei Steshenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding soundcard and syncrhonization - M-Audio Revolution 7.1, and
quite possibly M-Audio Revolution allow you to use external clock
source.
I meant M-Audio Revolution 7.1, and quite possibly M-Audio Revolution
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:33:39 +0100
Paolo Saggese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a question for you guys.
(I'm new to this list and hope this is the right place to ask
and not an FAQ... I've tried to search to see if this
29 matches
Mail list logo
