Hi Jensen,
Thanks for following up.
The Title says the document is about OAM for ALTO protocol, but the
Abstract says "operations and management". I prefer the Abstract's
choice of words.
Thanks for raising this issue. I double-checked RFC6291
Hi, Roman:
Ping your feedback on author’s proposed change (See below), which is used to
address your comments.
You also can check diff as follows:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-20.txt
Thanks in advance!
-Qin (on behalf of chairs)
发件人: alto
Hi Francesca,
Thanks a lot for your feedback. We will proceed with the next revision.
Best regards,
Sabine & co-authors
From: Francesca Palombini
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 3:01 PM
To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
; The IESG
Cc: alto-cha...@ietf.org;
Hi Adrian,
Really thank you for your "sanity review"! It is very helpful for us at
this moment. Let me separate my response into two parts to answer your
comments.
The following response applies to your comments until Sec 3. I'll send
another email to respond to your remaining comments soon.
Hi Sabine,
Thanks for addressing my review. I have cleared my DISCUSS (and kept the one
COMMENT while waiting for the update), I believe the IANA section looks good
now, and thanks for the clarifications, they did help me.
Francesca
From: iesg on behalf of Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-22: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hello Alexey,
We have posted a revision v22 that addresses the DISCUSS points raised in
Francesca's review. In particular, regarding the IANA registration, we would
like to have your feedback.
It is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/
We have
Dear Francesca and Alexeï,
We have posted a revision that addresses the DISCUSS points raised in
Francesca's review. In particular, regarding the IANA registration, we would
like to have the feedback of Alexeï.
It is available here.
We also addressed the COMMENTS of Francesca's review, except
Hello Benjamin,
We have posted a revision that addresses the DISCUSS points raised in your
review, together with the related COMMENTS on section 10.
Please see inline the e-mail below for the proposed updates.
The other comments will be addressed in a next revision.
Again thank you for your
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization WG of
the IETF.
Title : An ALTO Extension: Entity Property Maps
Authors : Wendy Roome
Hi Jensen,
Thank you for addressing all the comments! I have cleared my DISCUSS.
Francesca
From: iesg on behalf of Jensen Zhang
Date: Tuesday, 25 January 2022 at 14:01
To: Francesca Palombini
Cc: alto-chairs , The IESG ,
draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-a...@ietf.org
, IETF ALTO
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph,
Hi Francesca,
Thanks for pointing the remaining comments out. The new version is
available now:
IETF datatracker status page:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/
HTML version:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization WG of
the IETF.
Title : Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI)
Request Routing: CDNI Footprint and Capabilities
14 matches
Mail list logo
