Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-25 Thread CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
Hi, I support option 3. I can see the need to maintain the protocol but also to address new needs from industry. I've just recently started following ALTO WG, but from what I can see both at the WG and outside the IETF, there is interest from the industry to use ALTO and to explore extending it

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-23 Thread Jordi Ros Giralt
is what we need now. B/R, Jordi From: Y. Richard Yang Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 19:38 To: Sabine Randriamasy (Nokia) Cc: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com ; Jordi Ros Giralt ; Qin Wu ; alto@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

[alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-23 Thread Roland.Schott
Hi, regarding the statements I also want to share my view referring to: https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/wg-materials/blob/main/FutureALTO/alto-direction-of-work.md Seeing the enthusiasm of our working activity I think option 3 is that what the group want. The new ideas that are currently

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-23 Thread Y. Richard Yang
ll, in addition to separation into the networking domain and application domain in the computing integration use domain. Richard > > > Kind regards, > > Sabine > > > > *From:* alto *On Behalf Of * > mohamed.boucad...@orange.com > *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2023 8:12 AM

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-23 Thread Sabine Randriamasy (Nokia)
with the IPPM WG. Kind regards, Sabine From: alto On Behalf Of mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 8:12 AM To: Jordi Ros Giralt ; Qin Wu Cc: alto@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG Hi Jordi, all, Only some logistic comments, not reacting to any

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-23 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Ros Giralt Envoyé : jeudi 23 mars 2023 00:13 À : Qin Wu ; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : alto@ietf.org Objet : Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG Hi Med, Qin, Here is my feedback to your analysis below. I would like to start with a note. The ALTO team has brought

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-22 Thread LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
n nombre de mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Enviado el: miércoles, 22 de marzo de 2023 9:09 Para: IETF ALTO CC: Qin Wu Asunto: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG Hi all, As the WG is about to finalize the last chartered items, we would like to have a discussion on the future of the WG w

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-22 Thread Jordi Ros Giralt
Hi Med, Qin, Here is my feedback to your analysis below. I would like to start with a note. The ALTO team has brought (and continues to bring) a lot of positive energy (development of RFCs, deployments of the standard at major carriers and new deployments that are in the making, running

Re: [alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-22 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Hi Med, Qin, Thank you for initiating the discussion of this important topic. At a high level, my understanding of the proposed decision-making methodology is the following: let's have an assessment (it is called rational in the email and I will use the same term) of the current state and

[alto] Discussion on the future of ALTO WG

2023-03-22 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi all, As the WG is about to finalize the last chartered items, we would like to have a discussion on the future of the WG with all of you. We will also have a slot during the IETF#116 meeting on this matter. The plan is to let this discussion open for the coming two months (i.e., ** till end