o@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org
主题: Re: [alto] alto-oam-org
From: Jensen Zhang
Sent: 26 October 2023 12:46
To: tom petch
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; Martin Duke
Subject: Re: alto-oam-org
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for following up on this document. Sorry to miss
From: Jensen Zhang
Sent: 26 October 2023 12:46
To: tom petch
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; Martin Duke
Subject: Re: alto-oam-org
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for following up on this document. Sorry to miss the issues.
We have fixed them in
Jensen Zhang
Envoyé : jeudi 26 octobre 2023 13:47
À : tom petch
Cc : alto@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-oam-y...@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [alto] alto-oam-org
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for following up on this document. Sorry to miss the issues.
We have fixed them in
https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/draft-ietf
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for following up on this document. Sorry to miss the issues.
We have fixed them in
https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang/pull/100 and will
merge the changes to the next revision.
Thanks,
Jensen
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 7:25 PM tom petch wrote:
> I
I commented on this I-D 25sep23.
I got a response from the document shepherd which addressed two of my points
but not the others. I never got a response from an author.
I note that -15 still has issues that I raised. Two I notice are:
RFC9274 is in the text but not in the I-D References
