Re: amandad

2001-05-11 Thread Annette Bitz
I'm having trouble with amanda 2.4.1-p1 running on a RedHat-Linux-Server. Everything is working fine.. except the problem, that sonetimes the amandad is stopped. Can anyone tell me why? This is the message in /var/log/messages: May 4 14:59:56 earth xinetd[12802]: amanda service was

RE: amanda failed

2001-05-11 Thread Monserrat Seisdedos Nuñez
hello, and thanks for your answers. If my tar is broken or my amanda version is wrong, why it is the first time it happens since i started using amanda 4 months ago??? I will follow your advices. I recieved this mail, what is the meaning of no backup size line? Why the dump failded???

file system problem - umount

2001-05-11 Thread Marcelo G. Narciso
Hi people, I have a problem. When amdump send the message of backup, there is the message: canopusc0t6d0s0 lev 0 FAILED [/usr/sbin/ufsdump returned 3] FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS: /-- canopusc0t6d0s0 lev 0 FAILED [/usr/sbin/ufsdump returned 3] sendbackup: start [canopus:c0t6d0s0

Re: file system problem - umount

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
Marcelo G. Narciso wrote: | DUMP: Warning - cannot read sector 600384 of `/dev/rdsk/c0t6d0s0' | DUMP: Warning - cannot read sector 600400 of `/dev/rdsk/c0t6d0s0' It looks to me like you have some bad sectors on your disk, or possibly a disk drive that is on its way to failing, like the

compatible changers list 4 Solaris2.0

2001-05-11 Thread mohren
Hi, did anybody compile a list for compatible changers fro Solaris2.0? :-) e.g. does the HP-Dat4 Six-Slot work ( probably yes) or even the new HP LTO Ultrium 1/9 ? Werner Mohren System- and Networkmanager Research Center Ornithology of the Max Planck Society Max Planck Institute for

Re: tar question

2001-05-11 Thread Ray Shaw
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:51:43AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:41:24PM -0400, Ray Shaw wrote: On that note, it is annoying that if I have an exclude file, say /etc/amanda/exclude.home, running amanda with that file produces different results than: tar cvf

Re: tar question

2001-05-11 Thread Ray Shaw
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:36:07PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: ... I'd like to back up at least their mail, and probably web directories. ... I've been trying to do this with exclude lists, but I haven't hit the solution yet. ... Wow! I wouldn't have had the guts to try this with

GNU tar syntax (or How does amanda do that?)

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Brannigan
Some times I would like to just use GNU tar at the command line for a quick archive to a tape device on a remote host. My Amanda system seems to do this very well. Amanda some how uses GNU tar to archive files on a Solaris 2.6 host to a remote tape device that is attached to a Linux (7.0) host.

Re: Help with Tapeless Configuration

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
I'm new to Amanda and to this list... Welcome! First, when Amanda runs, it reports itself as 2.4.2p1 and not p2. Is the tapeio branch not in sync with the latest release? It is in sync, I just forgot to update the p1 to p2. It's fixed in the sources so if you do a cvs update and then start

Re: file system problem - umount

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
I have a problem. When amdump send the message of backup, there is the message: ... | DUMP: Warning - cannot read sector 600384 of `/dev/rdsk/c0t6d0s0' ... After amdump, the file system /dev/rdsk/c0t6d0s0 is unmounted. Why it happens? There isn't enough information here to know how to answer.

sendbackup*debug

2001-05-11 Thread George Herson
John R. Jackson wrote: What are the complete contents a typical /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug file for one of the failed runs? Don't have any from a failed run. Below is my only sendbackup*debug file, which is from the successful run. # cat /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug sendbackup:

Re: missing files

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
What shows an error occurred? ... By error I meant you didn't see all the entries in amrecover that you expected to see. There isn't anything in the sendbackup*debug file to indicate what went wrong (or even that anything did go wrong). The more useful place to look is the index file (see

Re: GNU tar syntax (or How does amanda do that?)

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
Amanda some how uses GNU tar to archive files on a Solaris 2.6 host to a remote tape device that is attached to a Linux (7.0) host. Yet when I try to do this at the command line I get tar complaints. Am I using the wrong syntax? Yes. Amanda doesn't do things the way you're thinking. It does

ERROR port 40001 not secure

2001-05-11 Thread syn uw
Hello I have a little problem, I am running my AMANDA backup server on my private network to backup some clients on my internet network. The problem is that between these two network I use NAT and NAT does some port mapping so it translates for example port 858 to 40001. And it looks like to

Re: ERROR port 40001 not secure

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
... the client needs to receive a request from a source port lower than 1024. So is there any method to disable this on the client side ?? ... Sure. Look for not secure in common-src/security.c and comment out that test. I would like to be able to backup even if the source port is over

Re: GNU tar syntax (or How does amanda do that?)

2001-05-11 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
John R. Jackson wrote: /usr/local/bin/tar -cvf - /home | rsh linux-host dd of=/dev/nst0 (you may want to specify '-b blocksize' to the tar command... and 'bs=blocksize' to the dd) The only problem with using dd like this is that dd does not do output reblocking. It takes whatever

Re: problem backing up a host with more than 171 disklist entries of root-tar

2001-05-11 Thread Marty Shannon, RHCE
This sounds like a classic case of running out of file descriptors -- either on a per-process basis, or on a system-wide basis (more likely per-process, as you seem to be able to reproduce it at will with the same number of disklist entries on that host). It seems to me that Amanda should

Re: problem backing up a host with more than 171 disklist entries of root-tar

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
Up to and including 171 disklist entries of type root-tar, everything is ok. ... If I add some more disklist entries of the same type, amcheck hangs for a minute (ctimeout 60) and then reports selfcheck request timed out. Host down? Wow. If it's what I think it is, that bug has been around

Dumping live filesystems on Linux 2.4 - Corruption

2001-05-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I am sure everybody has seen this: http://www.lwn.net/2001/0503/kernel.php3 It would seem that one can no longer use dump (assuming one is using Linux 2.4) to backup live filesystems. So is everybody here now using gnutar to backup filesystems on Linux 2.4? Is there any loss of functionality

Re: Dumping live filesystems on Linux 2.4 - Corruption

2001-05-11 Thread C. Chan
Also Sprach Brian J. Murrell: I am sure everybody has seen this: http://www.lwn.net/2001/0503/kernel.php3 It would seem that one can no longer use dump (assuming one is using Linux 2.4) to backup live filesystems. So is everybody here now using gnutar to backup filesystems on Linux

Re: Dumping live filesystems on Linux 2.4 - Corruption

2001-05-11 Thread John R. Jackson
... I'd like know how to tell Amanda to use xfsdump rather than GNU tar on XFS partitions. Doesn't just setting program to DUMP in the dumptype do this? Amanda should auto-detect the file system type and run the correct dump program (assuming it found it when you ran ./configure). For instance,

Re: Dumping live filesystems on Linux 2.4 - Corruption

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
C. Chan wrote: I'm experimenting with XFS now and if I run into any glitches I'll let the Amanda list know. I'd like know how to tell Amanda to use xfsdump rather than GNU tar on XFS partitions. I think you would have to recompile amanda. I would install xfsdump/xfsrestore and rpm -e dump

Re: Linux kernel 2.4 and dump vs. SGI XFS

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Dill
Hi folks, If you are concerned about dumping live filesystem with Linux kernel 2.4, you might be interested in this: SGI has released an updated anaconda installer CD for Red Hat 7.1 with XFS journaled filesystem support. You load the installer CD first, which includes only the RPMs necessary