seg fault from chg-scsi (long)

2001-09-06 Thread Chris Anderson
Greetings all, I'm getting a seg fault from the chg-scsi program when I try to do 'amcheck' and it's driving me somewhat crazy. (Apologies in advance for the length of this email; I figured better too much info than not enough). Here's what happens: Amanda Tape Server Host Check ---

What determines the order files(systems) get backed up?

2001-09-06 Thread Sheldon Knight
Hi, I am using amanda 4.2P2 and would like to be able to influence the order files are backed up to tape. I would prefer largest files first. This would assist in increasing the usage of the tape and if more than one tape was required small files would remain to be backed up rather than a larg

DLT8000 questions ?

2001-09-06 Thread Eric Chamberland
DLT8000 : what would be the best for the tapetype definition : 1- define tapetype DLT8000 { comment "DLT8000 tape non-compressed" length 4 mbytes # 40 Gig uncompressed filemark # No idea...need your help speed 6000 kbytes # 6.0 Mb/s

Question with Robot

2001-09-06 Thread Eric Chamberland
I everyone !!! I'm new here and i want to know how to set my robot with amanda; I had no problem with the installation of amanda but now i want to configure amanda with my robot. I'm on solaris 2.7(on E450) With the StoreEDGE L20 (robot) with DLT tape library 2/20 and a have a native E450 tape

Re: Discs instead of tapes (was RE: Newbie and not quite understanding ...)

2001-09-06 Thread bhlewis
Hello, Christopher Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I would like to do is use disks instead of tapes. I can buy enough > disks and a removable drive bay to back up my system for considerably less > than an adequate tape drive would cost (in my experience cheap tape systems > like DDS

amanda client broken pipe

2001-09-06 Thread Kurt Yoder
Hello I'm getting a weird error on one of my amanda clients (2.4.1p1 on freebsd 4.2 using gnu tar v 1.13) that I'm having trouble understanding: FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS: /-- galadriel. /usr lev 0 FAILED [data timeout] sendbackup: start [galadriel.shcorp.com:/usr level 0] sendbackup: inf

Re: disklist config

2001-09-06 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 at 11:33pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > My dumptype has no exclusions at all. How come > the original disklist with: > hostname / dumptype > > does not pickup the other file systems which are mounted as /usr and /var? 'dump' always works on a per-filesystem basis, and amanda pas

Re: recovering index

2001-09-06 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 at 10:40am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > i have an old tape with backup on itunfortunately , i don't have the > index file for this tape > > is someone knows how to extract a specified file from this tape? > is it possible to recover the index file for this tape ? If the

Amanda Keeps Seeing Disks As New Disks

2001-09-06 Thread Walker, Craig
Hi, I have recently set up a new backup server running Amanda 2.4.1p1, after some initial teething problems it now seems to be running. My problem is that every morning I check the log file for the previous nights dumps and find that the first lines in the log file is planner saying that the dis

disklist config

2001-09-06 Thread auto216416
I have this disk on a Linux box which has three separate file systems. /, /usr, and /var. Now if I have a disklist that says hostname / dumptype I only get / backed up not /usr or /var. If I specify the other two in the disklist then all is ok. hostname / dumptype hostname /usr dumpt

Discs instead of tapes (was RE: Newbie and not quite understanding ...)

2001-09-06 Thread Christopher Hicks
> >The easy way around this problem is to use holding disk(s). Disk is >dirt cheap these days. Put in enough to hold an entire night's run >and you can stream all your dumps to disk quickly. What I would like to do is use disks instead of tapes. I can buy enough disks and a removable drive

Re: Newbie and not quite understanding ...

2001-09-06 Thread Paul Bijnens
Mark Holm wrote: > I have a 35Gb holding disk on the machine running Amanda right now, which > with compression should hold about 1/2 of what we are attempting to backup, > especially if I can get it down to just incrementals during the week. I have > had several suggestions about doing a separa