I'm decom' a server that was a tape hog. So consequently I'm able to
adjust my runtapes. Has anybody experienced any adverse situations that
would be derived from reducing the runtapes?
Don
Also Sprach Joshua Baker-LePain:
chg-multi is what you're looking for -- it lets you use two tape drives as
a changer. Keep in mind that a single disklist entry still can't be
bigger than a single tape.
Is there currently a way to back up to two or more tape drives simultaneously
using the
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, C. Chan wrote:
Is there currently a way to back up to two or more tape drives simultaneously
using the same Amanda config?
Apparently not. I have a 30-slot jukebox attached to two drives and use
two different configs to run the robot and perform backups (sometimes
Zhen Liu
Via Webmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message ---
From: Zhen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:09:14 -0500
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions, I did change the etimeout from 300
(5minutes by default) to 3600 (1
Akdeniz Göz Merkezi her zaman oldugu gibi tum lens cesitlerini en uygun
fiyatlarla sizlere sunmaktadir.
Ustelik bir telefon yada e-mail ile adresinize teslim.
AKDENIZ GOZ MERKEZI www.akdenizgoz.com
Fevzipasa cad. No:73 Fatih / Istanbul 0 212 635 74 74
Hi,
I am a relatively new amanda users. I got a problem where I could not
find answers in the exsiting mail archive.
The problem is: in my disklist file I listed
machinename /dev/sda6 root-tar
/dev/sda6 is my root partition and the mount point is /
and I always get the error message about
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 at 2:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I checked the sendsize.*.debug file. It looks like that amanda didn't
translate the filesystem names to the right dirname.
A working case will be like:
calculating for amname '/dev/sda1' dirname '/boot'
the failed case looks like
So early Saturday morning our tape server suffered a kernel panic, and
it appears to have happened smack in the middle of the amdump run. When
I brought the machine back up I looked and found that the run had not
completed, so I ran amcleanup, which appears to have taken care of the
logfiles
I started up amdump by hand (although it didn't background itself like
one would think it would given all the other amanda programs do ...
Amflush is the only Amanda program that backgrounds itself, so I'm not
sure what you mean by all the other amanda programs do.
[dumps too big, but cannot
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 11:15:23 -0500
From: John R. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
But tapetype length was set to 35000. ...
What was runtapes set to?
From
How about this being tucked into amanda -
http://www.traakan.com/ndmjob/index.html
http://www.traakan.com/ndmjob/cthon-2000.htm
Maybe I misunderstand - but a standard module like this sounds
right to go with the mangement amanda provides/
rcb
John R. Jackson wrote:
Is there any way to
I can't seem to find the file you are referring to...
It's in `amgetconf config logdir` (sorry, I forget that because that's
the same as my amanda.conf directory).
Dick
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just changed my longtime Amanda server from BSDI to FBSD 4.4-Stable and
I'm not sure if I'm using the correct tape device.
Here's what dmesg shows:
sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0
sa0: SEAGATE DAT06240-XXX 8071 Removable Sequential Access SCSI-3 device
sa0: 80.000MB/s transfers
I have a Sun StorEdge 4mm DDS-3 autoloader (magazine of 6 tapes loader)
http://www.sun.com/storage/dds/index.html
any one with correct changer.conf file and know what tpchanger be set to in
amanda.conf ?
Thank You
-
Ben Fallah
Senior
I can't seem to find the file you are referring to...
It's in `amgetconf config logdir` (sorry, I forget that because that's
the same as my amanda.conf directory).
It's in /var/lib/amanda/Daily/amdump.3:
DELAYING DUMPS IF NEEDED, total_size 46743613, tape length 3584 mark 1931
delay:
Anyone have a DDS-3 (4mm, 12 GB native) unit that has been removed
from service? I am looking for a unit that is considered obsolete by
the current owner; which I hope would make it nearly worthless and
therefore quite inexpensive to procure from you... :)
Thank you...
I have amanda (2.4.3b2) running for the most part but it will not send
me a report
When I run amreport I get the following message
sh: NONE: command not found
amreport: mail command failed: NONE -s MEC Denver AMANDA MAIL REPORT
FOR March 28, 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would think that I could
At 2002-04-02T01:46:18Z, Doug Silver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So for the non-rewinding tape device I put in /dev/nsa0, which seems to
make sense after reading the mt and sa man pages (I know, I shouldn't be
RTFM'ing before hand, but oh well ;). I've tried both /dev/nsa0 and
/dev/nrsa0 --
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): tape is now frozen- use an OFFLINE, REWIND or MTEOM
command to clear this state.
I seem to recall hearing this before. Try searching the mailing list
archive.
# dump 0f /dev/nsa0 /etc
...
DUMP: bad sblock magic number
DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.
U, is /etc a
. Then look for the from taper: DONE lines and the kb value.
Here's an example:
DUMP HHH AAA 20020401 1 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 11772 11
DUMP HHH BBB 20020401 1 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 1092 5
This say disk AAA on host HHH is expected to need 11772 KBytes and disk
BBB is expected to need 1092 KBytes
I would think that I could find the simple thing I need to change in
order to get sendmail to replace none but I can't find it. any help
would be greatly appricated.
You need a program that understands -s subject. ./configure looks
for Mail, mailx and mail in your PATH. It apparently didn't
On Mon, 2002-04-01 at 19:01, Kirk Strauser wrote:
At 2002-04-02T01:46:18Z, Doug Silver [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So for the non-rewinding tape device I put in /dev/nsa0, which seems to
make sense after reading the mt and sa man pages (I know, I shouldn't be
RTFM'ing before hand, but oh
While we're on the topic, I have a theoretical question. We too are going
to be splitting our backups in a very non-amanda way. The reason for us is
that our incrementals tend to be small, so it's a waste of money for a small
research group to do incrementals to the 100GB SDLT tape. Instead,
23 matches
Mail list logo
