--On Friday, September 20, 2002 20:58:42 -0400 Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Friday 20 September 2002 16:32, Frank Smith wrote:
--On Friday, September 20, 2002 21:46:48 +0200 Marcus Schopen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Friday, September 20, 2002 17:46:28
--On Friday, September 20, 2002 22:35:33 -0500 Neil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Looks like my amanda is getting better. :)
Take a look at the email report that amanda sent me.
http://restricted.dyndns.org/amandareport.txt
And here is my new amanda.conf.
--On Friday, September 20, 2002 21:19:43 -0400 Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd think that rather than larger tapes, faster drives would be
higher on the list, if for no other reason than to get the darned
job done before the offices open in the morning. Here, it
occasionally
On Friday 20 September 2002 23:35, Neil wrote:
Hi guys,
Looks like my amanda is getting better. :)
Take a look at the email report that amanda sent me.
http://restricted.dyndns.org/amandareport.txt
Looks good, but it appears from the kb/s rate you are getting, that
the drives hardware
On Saturday 21 September 2002 02:24, Frank Smith wrote:
--On Friday, September 20, 2002 21:19:43 -0400 Gene Heskett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd think that rather than larger tapes, faster drives would be
higher on the list, if for no other reason than to get the
darned job done before the
Hm,
what os do u use?
we are using a HP 24x6 which should be the same robot,
but with a smaler (DDS III) drive in it under linux with chg-scsi
(from amanda-2.5, as the one of 2.4.2p2 is buggy) and amanda 2.4p2
since over one year without any problems.
Interested in chg-scsi.conf?
Christoph
Pete
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:19:43PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
seen it work in practice here, nor do I need it, but my system is
only 46gigs, which amanda cheerfully uses about half a 4gig tape
per nightly run to back it all up on a 1 week dumpcycle.
Gene - I've seen you mention this a few
Gene Heskett writes:
Looks good, but it appears from the kb/s rate you are getting, that
the drives hardware compression is turned on, which doubles the
effective data rate. Thats a maximum of a 400kb/s drive without
that.
Are you saying that setting hardware compression to off is
Good day guys,
What is amanda's approach to backup commercial software like Microsoft
Exchange 5.5 mail server? It's because in Exchange, they have this public
store and private store files. Commercial backup such as BackupExec can
backup/restore each mailboxes via agents.
Will there be
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 07:44:31AM -0500, Neil wrote:
Good day guys,
What is amanda's approach to backup commercial software like Microsoft
Exchange 5.5 mail server? It's because in Exchange, they have this public
store and private store files. Commercial backup such as BackupExec can
Hello fellow amanda users,
I have been using amanda for some time, successfully backing up whole
filsystems with dump. Now I'm trying to back up only parts of one
(large) filesystem using gnutar and the exclude-list feature. The
relevant config snippets are as follows (machine lissy is server
Hello Neil,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 07:38:01AM -0500, Neil wrote:
Gene Heskett writes:
3) mt -f /dev/sra0 datcompression off
I man mt but didn't find similar option as above.
there are different implementations of the mt utlitiy. On my Debian 3.0
system I find:
- GNU mt version 2.4.2
Hi Christoph,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 06:32:03PM +0200, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
your exclude-list syntax is not correct
[...]
[/etc/amanda/exclude.gtar]
/disk-c1/martin/mac
this should read
./mac
it is relative to the root stated in your disklist-entry.
ah, so absolute paths
Im running redhat 7.3 and amanda 2.4.2p2.
I'd appreciate a copy of your amanda.conf, chg-scsi, and chg-scsi.conf!
thanks
pete
At 9/21/2002 05:05 AM, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hm,
what os do u use?
we are using a HP 24x6 which should be the same robot,
but with a smaler (DDS III) drive in it
On Saturday 21 September 2002 13:05, Martin Schwarz wrote:
Hi Christoph,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 06:32:03PM +0200, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
your exclude-list syntax is not correct
[...]
[/etc/amanda/exclude.gtar]
/disk-c1/martin/mac
this should read
./mac
Correct.
it is
Gene Heskett writes:
5) rerun the tapetype and get the true capacity of the tape so
you can update that entry in your amanda.conf. It should go up
a bit because tapetype uses /dev/urandom as the data source for
its test writes, and the data from /dev/urandom is so random
that it
On Saturday 21 September 2002 10:59, Martin Schwarz wrote:
Hello fellow amanda users,
I have been using amanda for some time, successfully backing up
whole filsystems with dump. Now I'm trying to back up only parts
of one (large) filesystem using gnutar and the exclude-list
feature. The
On Saturday 21 September 2002 16:05, Neil wrote:
Gene Heskett writes:
5) rerun the tapetype and get the true capacity of the tape so
you can update that entry in your amanda.conf. It should go
up a bit because tapetype uses /dev/urandom as the data source
for its test writes, and the data
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Neil wrote:
What is amanda's approach to backup commercial software like Microsoft
Exchange 5.5 mail server? It's because in Exchange, they have this public
Jon's reply is a good description of amanda itself. Haven't checked
into it yet but I've heard there's another
19 matches
Mail list logo
