Hi Jon,
I may have missed an earlier post, but what kind of network is
between the two devices (server you are wanting to back up
Snap storage) ?
If you have 10Mbps ethernet hub, then 3.5MB/sec is an extremely
good figure. If you have 100Mbps switches between the two
devices, then 3.5MB/sec is
I think, some jet lag though...
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 512M
99.21% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:50:03PM +0200, Thomas Franz wrote:
Hello,
sometimes, I have to rename a server(amanda client) in this case:
server.domain1 - server.domain2
( a server is moving into another zone)
Now, I have changed the disklist , the directories in index-dir and
all
Maybe I'm off base, but haven't there been some recent threads about changes
in signal handling in RH 9? I think a patch to amanda 2.4.4 was posted to
fix the problem.
Search the archives for redhat 9, or SIG -- should be within the last two
months.
Note that I don't have RH9, so I haven't had
Hi, amanda-users,
I am planning to upgrade my customers server to Samba 3.0 this week.
I would also like to upgrade their Amanda-server to Samba 3.0, to be
up-to-date.
As I noticed on Sept. 25th, Amanda did not work with Samba 3.0.
I was on vacation for two weeks now and had disabled my
Gene Heskett wrote:
I think, some jet lag though...
OK Gene...I have to ask...Why are you copyrighting your email?
=G=
Hi.
I have the following settings.
dumpcycle 3 days
runspercycle 3 days
tapecycle 8 tapes
runtapes 1
tapedev /dev/nst0
From the backup report that is sent to me every day everything seems to
be fine. However, there is one thing that bugs me. The report begins
like this
These dumps were to
I recognice the problem. Among other things I needed to switch
from localhost to the correct host name :-(
Two reservations:
1. I am no shell script expert. There is only a little error checking,
so this could bite you.
2. The technique is not based on any official Amanda
documentation. It
Mads Pultz wrote:
I have the following settings.
dumpcycle 3 days
runspercycle 3 days
tapecycle 8 tapes
runtapes 1
tapedev /dev/nst0
From the backup report that is sent to me every day everything seems to
be fine. However, there is one thing that bugs me. The report begins
like this
These
--On Monday, October 20, 2003 20:39:45 +0200 Mads Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have the following settings.
dumpcycle 3 days
runspercycle 3 days
tapecycle 8 tapes
runtapes 1
tapedev /dev/nst0
From the backup report that is sent to me every day everything seems to
be
Hi.
Thanks for all your replies. I'm not through my tapecycle yet so that is
probably the reason.
Regards
Mads
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 21:34, Frank Smith wrote:
--On Monday, October 20, 2003 20:39:45 +0200 Mads Pultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have the following settings.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:29:13PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:24:05PM +0530, Rohit Peyyeti wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
localhost /h lev 0 FAILED [dumps too big, but cannot incremental dump new disk]
[plus three more of the same]
This suggests
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:53:34AM -0700, Dana Bourgeois wrote:
alta / lev 0 FAILED [disk / offline on alta?]
I hate that message; it's extremely misleading. Besides what it
says, it can also mean that sendsize was unable to parse the
output of whatever subcommand it ran. That in turn
On Monday 20 October 2003 13:53, Galen Johnson wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
I think, some jet lag though...
OK Gene...I have to ask...Why are you copyrighting your email?
=G=
Because of yahoo's TOS. (of a couple of years ago, I don't know their
current TOS) Someone had emailed me a copy quite
14 matches
Mail list logo
