Re: Release of amanda-2.5.1p2

2006-11-10 Thread Fabio Corazza
Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il giorno gio, 09/11/2006 alle 15.36 -0800, Paddy Sreenivasan ha scritto: Amanda 2.5.1p2 RPMs, Windows MSI, and source tar ball are available for following platforms at http://www.zmanda.com/downloads.html [...] Hi Paddy, I checked the binary packages for SLES9 but

Re: chg-scsi used to work then it stopped: details inside.

2006-11-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Hi Tanniel, You are the second person to report this problem with the debian package. Could you try http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~martinea/amanda/amanda-2.5.1p2-chg-scsi.tar.gz Compile it, you don't need to install it. cd to your config directory. run '/path/to/new/chg-scsi -info' send me the

Re: Wildcards in disklist--revisited, only using exclusions:

2006-11-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Hi Ian, Remove the trailling '/' from your include/exclude. Jean-Louis Ian R. Justman wrote: Hi, all. To summarize, I'm trying to back up a hashed spool of mailboxes on our mailserver at work. The top directory of that spool has five hundred directories numbered 0-499 and I want to back

What user should be selected for amanda on reiserfs?

2006-11-10 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Hi all, from what I understand, the amanda user should be able to read all files (when using gtar) or the device node (when using dump). The system I am testing amanda on is SLES9 with reiserfs file system over LVM devices, so I think I cannot use the normal /sbin/dump command (since it is meant

Re: What user should be selected for amanda on reiserfs?

2006-11-10 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 at 2:14pm, Giuseppe Sacco wrote from what I understand, the amanda user should be able to read all files (when using gtar) or the device node (when using dump). Yes on the latter, but not the former. The system I am testing amanda on is SLES9 with reiserfs file system

Re: What user should be selected for amanda on reiserfs?

2006-11-10 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno ven, 10/11/2006 alle 08.28 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain ha scritto: [...] In order to use gnu tar, I think I have to build amanda with --with-user=root, otherwise the backup will not be able to read all files. Is this true? *No*. Backups using tar are kicked off by the setuid

Re: Release of amanda-2.5.1p2

2006-11-10 Thread Paddy Sreenivasan
Giuseppe, Fabio, We will build 64bit versions of the RPMs and make them available soon. Can you please provide information on why you need 64 bit version of Amanda? Thanks, Paddy On 11/10/06, Giuseppe Sacco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Il giorno gio, 09/11/2006 alle 15.36 -0800, Paddy

Re: Release of amanda-2.5.1p2

2006-11-10 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 07:19:55AM -0800, Paddy Sreenivasan enlightened us: Giuseppe, Fabio, We will build 64bit versions of the RPMs and make them available soon. Can you please provide information on why you need 64 bit version of Amanda? On a 64-bit OS, it elliminates the need for

Re: Release of amanda-2.5.1p2

2006-11-10 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno ven, 10/11/2006 alle 07.19 -0800, Paddy Sreenivasan ha scritto: Giuseppe, Fabio, We will build 64bit versions of the RPMs and make them available soon. Can you please provide information on why you need 64 bit version of Amanda? No special reasons. I am testing amanda on a 64bit

Re: Release of amanda-2.5.1p2

2006-11-10 Thread Fabio Corazza
Paddy Sreenivasan wrote: Giuseppe, Fabio, We will build 64bit versions of the RPMs and make them available soon. Can you please provide information on why you need 64 bit version of Amanda? I build my servers with x86_64 packages only, so that's why I need 64bit versions. Actually I was

amanda-2.5.1p2: bogus req packet...

2006-11-10 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
Hello, I compiled amanda-2.5.1p2 on irix and I'm getting a bogus request packet error by amcheck but only and only if a DLE is using xfsdump. Anyone seen that? amadmin disklist reports for this DLE: disk /data/narsad/narsad1: program DUMP priority 2 dumpcycle 14

amtoc -a is producing tape.toc not 'tape'.toc

2006-11-10 Thread Deb Baddorf
Hiya -- I recompiled to version 2.5.0p2 a week ago. Previously (probably a lower version but I forget) amtoc -a logfile produced a file with the tape label as the name. ex: mytape01.toc Since then, it is producing the literal file tape.toc which is less helpful,

Re: amtoc -a is producing tape.toc not 'tape'.toc

2006-11-10 Thread Jean-Francois Malouin
* Deb Baddorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20061110 15:56]: Hiya -- I recompiled to version 2.5.0p2 a week ago. Previously (probably a lower version but I forget) amtoc -a logfile produced a file with the tape label as the name. ex: mytape01.toc Since then, it is producing