Fwd: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Gene Heskett
Uptime is about 5 days now, but this may be the beginning of the end. Something made it think all data was new from the looks of this. This was the first run of 20090323, 20090321 works fine. Another device mapper screwup? It was updated by yum yesterday. -- Forwarded Message

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 09 April 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote: Uptime is about 5 days now, but this may be the beginning of the end. Something made it think all data was new from the looks of this. This was the first run of

Fwd: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Gene Heskett
I ran another session after installing 0325, more of the same. Somewhat different of course. Now I'm going to restart x to test a new radeonhd driver, and will install 0326 do another session. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9,

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote: Yeas, but I thought we had worked out something that made amanda immune to those little annoyances?  Or was tar changed and the fix didn't work now? Hard to say -- is there anything in the sendsize backup logs that

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote: Uptime is about 5 days now, but this may be the beginning of the end. Something made it think all data was new from the looks of this.  This was the first run of 20090323, 20090321 works fine.  Another device mapper

Re: Fwd: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread John Hein
Gene Heskett wrote at 08:53 -0400 on Apr 9, 2009: Uptime is about 5 days now, but this may be the beginning of the end. Something made it think all data was new from the looks of this. This was the first run of 20090323, 20090321 works fine. Another device mapper screwup? It was

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread John Hein
Gene Heskett wrote at 10:05 -0400 on Apr 9, 2009: On Thursday 09 April 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote: Uptime is about 5 days now, but this may be the beginning of the end. Something made it think all data

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM, John Hein jh...@timing.com wrote: This (snippet below from the gtar NEWS file) was added in 1.21 == * New options --no-check-device, --check-device. This was actually added in 1.19.90, according to amgtar(8), and Gene is using the

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread John Hein
John Hein wrote at 08:47 -0600 on Apr 9, 2009: This (snippet below from the gtar NEWS file) was added in 1.21 Woops. Sorry --no-check-device was added for 1.20. I've never tested it, however. If you can prove a device number change and use of this option is causing the big incremental dump

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 09 April 2009, John Hein wrote: Gene Heskett wrote at 10:05 -0400 on Apr 9, 2009: On Thursday 09 April 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote: Uptime is about 5 days now, but this may be the beginning of

Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2009

2009-04-09 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 09 April 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:47 AM, John Hein jh...@timing.com wrote: This (snippet below from the gtar NEWS file) was added in 1.21 == * New options --no-check-device, --check-device. This was actually added in

client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Brian Cuttler
I'm trying to migrate an amanda client, SGI/IRIX with amanda 2.4.1p1 from server Solaris 9 with amanda 2.4.4 to a server Solaris 10 with amanda 2.6.1. I have an error, but don't see anything standing out in the client's /tmp/amanda tree. FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY: everest /images3 lev 0 FAILED

Re: client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:   everest /images3 lev 0  FAILED [dumper1 died] Check the dumper debug logs on the server, rather than the client. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com

Git repository moving

2009-04-09 Thread Nikolas Coukouma
As part of the effort to make development more visible, I've moved the mirror of the Subversion repository from nikolasco on GitHub to zmanda on GitHub. This will let me expose development branches on my nikolasco account, the way dustin has with the perltaper branch

Re: client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Brian Cuttler
: start at Thu Apr 9 16:48:27 EDT 2009 amdump: datestamp 20090409 amdump: starttime 20090409164827 amdump: starttime-locale-independent 2009-04-09 16:48:27 EDT planner: pid 22319 executable /usr/local/libexec/amanda/planner version 2.6.1-20090227 planner: build: VERSION=Amanda-2.6.1-20090227 planner

Re: client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
: pid 23052 finish time Thu Apr 9 16:48:47 2009 amdump.1 amdump: start at Thu Apr 9 16:48:27 EDT 2009 amdump: datestamp 20090409 amdump: starttime 20090409164827 amdump: starttime-locale-independent 2009-04-09 16:48:27 EDT planner: pid 22319 executable /usr/local/libexec/amanda/planner

Re: client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote: # more chunker.20090409164847.debug That's a chunker debug log -- do you have a dumper debug log? dumper.20090409164847.debug or something similar? You may have several -- see if you can find one that shows something

Re: client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Brian, Can you try this patch? I need this path to connect to a 2.4.2p1 client, I was not able to compile 2.4.1 Jean-Louis Brian Cuttler wrote: I'm trying to migrate an amanda client, SGI/IRIX with amanda 2.4.1p1 from server Solaris 9 with amanda 2.4.4 to a server Solaris 10 with amanda

Re: client failure

2009-04-09 Thread Dustin J. Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jean-Louis Martineau martin...@zmanda.com wrote: Can you try this patch? I need this path to connect to a 2.4.2p1 client, I was not able to compile 2.4.1 The patch looks good to me, whether it solves Brian's problem notwithstanding. Dustin -- Open Source

[Amanda-users] Script Exec format error ?

2009-04-09 Thread Topper
FAILED Script 'abas-stop' command 'PRE-HOST-ESTIMATE': sendsize: error [exec /usr/libexec/amanda/application/abas-stop: Exec format error] What does this means ? The pre/post scripts are not ran. Scripts run on ll /usr/libexec/amanda/application/ 4 -rwxr-xr-x 1 amandabackup disk96 Apr 8