Hi Jean-Louis,
On 01/10/12 16:13, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
So the bug is that amanda reported:
These dumps were to tape Daily-24.
which is not true since amanda did not succeed to write to it.
Not exactly as I see the how many data is left on the holding disk after
these reports.
I'd
On 10/02/2012 04:58 AM, Attila Bogár wrote:
Hi Jean-Louis,
On 01/10/12 16:13, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
So the bug is that amanda reported:
These dumps were to tape Daily-24.
which is not true since amanda did not succeed to write to it.
Not exactly as I see the how many data is left on
Hi Jean-Louis,
On 02/10/12 13:30, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
I'd refine the bug: amanda flushes to the write-protected tape, the
dump is removed from the holding disk (of course it's not on tape),
reports the dump were to Daily-24 and re-expects the same tape.
Amanda flushed nothing to
Guy,
The reporting issue in amstatus (reporting negative value) is already
fix, check the svn tree.
I'm surprised that you complain about a small amstatus reporting issue
but not about the fact that your backup failed, you should have at least
posted the error from the email report.
I
Attila,
The attached patch fix amstatus and amdump to report that the tape is
write protected.
I do not have a tape drive on hand so I can't test it. I appreciate if
someone can test it.
Jean-Louis
On 10/02/2012 08:46 AM, Attila Bogár wrote:
Hi Jean-Louis,
On 02/10/12 13:30, Jean-Louis
On 10/02/2012 10:10 AM, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Attila,
The attached patch fix amstatus and amdump to report that the tape is
write protected.
I mean amcheck and amdump.
I do not have a tape drive on hand so I can't test it. I appreciate if
someone can test it.
Jean-Louis
On
