Re: Labelstr issues with 3.4.3

2017-05-01 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 05:46:26AM +0200, Uwe Menges wrote: > On 05/02/17 03:19, Luc Lalonde wrote: > > Since upgrading to 3.4.3 I seem to having problems with Amanda recognizing > > my tapes. > > > > Here’s the ‘labelstr’ directive in my ‘amanda.conf’: > > labelstr "^000[0-9][0-9][0-9]*” > > Thi

Re: Labelstr issues with 3.4.3

2017-05-01 Thread Uwe Menges
On 05/02/17 03:19, Luc Lalonde wrote: > Since upgrading to 3.4.3 I seem to having problems with Amanda recognizing my > tapes. > > Here’s the ‘labelstr’ directive in my ‘amanda.conf’: > labelstr "^000[0-9][0-9][0-9]*” > This worked fine when I was running version 3.3.4-1… But now, I’m getting >

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Monday 01 May 2017 21:28:01 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 01 May 2017 19:27:04 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > > Jean-Louis — do you know if one can use the newer versions of tar to > > recover stuff that was backed up using these “bad” versions of tar? > > Or does the recording version have to be ne

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 May 2017 19:27:04 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > Jean-Louis — do you know if one can use the newer versions of tar to > recover stuff that was backed up using these “bad” versions of tar? > Or does the recording version have to be newer too? > > (I.e. maybe Gene could still test using h

Labelstr issues with 3.4.3

2017-05-01 Thread Luc Lalonde
Hello Folks, Since upgrading to 3.4.3 I seem to having problems with Amanda recognizing my tapes. Here’s the ‘labelstr’ directive in my ‘amanda.conf’: labelstr "^000[0-9][0-9][0-9]*” This worked fine when I was running version 3.3.4-1… But now, I’m getting errors. Here are examples of some

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 May 2017 19:27:04 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > Jean-Louis — do you know if one can use the newer versions of tar to > recover stuff that was backed up using these “bad” versions of tar? > Or does the recording version have to be newer too? > > (I.e. maybe Gene could still test using h

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Debra S Baddorf
Jean-Louis — do you know if one can use the newer versions of tar to recover stuff that was backed up using these “bad” versions of tar?Or does the recording version have to be newer too? (I.e. maybe Gene could still test using his existing backups. And this would mean that older backups

Re: Released in Debian, on experimental, amanda-3.4.3

2017-05-01 Thread Charles Curley
On Mon, 1 May 2017 12:14:48 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote: > Am 2017-03-06 um 19:14 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am announcing that I have released in Debian a new amanda package > > 3.4.3, in experimental. Was released in experimental because Debian > > is on freeze.

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 May 2017 16:37:11 Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: > Gene, > > Which version of tar are you using? 1.27.1 > Read the thread at > https://www.mail-archive.com/amanda-users@amanda.org/msg48929.html > > Jean-Louis > Says 1.29 fixes this. I'll have to build it from the tarball, 1.27.1 is the

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Debra S Baddorf
> On May 1, 2017, at 3:37 PM, Jean-Louis Martineau > wrote: > > Gene, > > Which version of tar are you using? > Read the thread at > https://www.mail-archive.com/amanda-users@amanda.org/msg48929.html > > Jean-Louis The solution in that thread boils down to this: I'd guess this is a tar bug

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Gene, Which version of tar are you using? Read the thread at https://www.mail-archive.com/amanda-users@amanda.org/msg48929.html Jean-Louis On 30/04/17 10:52 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > Greetings all; > > The last time I used amrecover I had to make a tempdir on the same disk > as the stuff I want

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 May 2017 15:53:10 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > > On May 1, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Gene Heskett > > wrote: > > > > On Monday 01 May 2017 13:55:09 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > >>> On Apr 30, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Gene Heskett > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sunday 30 April 2017 23:46:42 Jon LaBadie wrote

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Debra S Baddorf
> On May 1, 2017, at 2:38 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 01 May 2017 13:55:09 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > >>> On Apr 30, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Gene Heskett >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sunday 30 April 2017 23:46:42 Jon LaBadie wrote: On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:52:00PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 01 May 2017 13:55:09 Debra S Baddorf wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Gene Heskett > > wrote: > > > > On Sunday 30 April 2017 23:46:42 Jon LaBadie wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:52:00PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> Greetings all; > >>> > >>> The last time I used amre

Re: amrecover isn't

2017-05-01 Thread Debra S Baddorf
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 11:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Sunday 30 April 2017 23:46:42 Jon LaBadie wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:52:00PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> Greetings all; >>> >>> The last time I used amrecover I had to make a tempdir on the same >>> disk as the stuff I w

Re: Released in Debian, on experimental, amanda-3.4.3

2017-05-01 Thread Markus Storm
and will this be available on all architectures, specifically ARM (to run on a Pi), too ? Any special repository I would need to use ? thanks Markus Am 01.05.2017 um 12:14 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 2017-03-06 um 19:14 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: Hi, I am announcing that I have released i

Re: Released in Debian, on experimental, amanda-3.4.3

2017-05-01 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2017-03-06 um 19:14 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > > Hi, > > I am announcing that I have released in Debian a new amanda package > 3.4.3, in experimental. Was released in experimental because Debian > is on freeze. What is the status for amanda on Debian now? Which release(s) available for stab