I'm running 2.6.1 on Solaris 10 for both client and server
(client != server), one is x86, the other sparc.
We have, er, 60+ DLE on the client, finsen, I don't know why
we get dumper retries or estimate timeouts, and the badly
formatted response is new behavior.
I'm not too concerned about the
I have an amanda 2.6.1 running on Solaris 10x86 (different from
my earlier email). Single client for this server, Client == Server,
name=cascade.
I have yet to get my runs under 24 hours reliably, we are working
on HW striping the work area (technical issue with our understanding
of the raid inc
I thought we would get by when we saw this error for a single
partition, but its now preventing the client from amchecking
at all.
Server Amanda 2.6.1, Solaris 10/x86
Client amanda 2.6.1 Solaris 10/Sparc
On server.
amcheck -c curie finsen
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
is a single DLE, but perhaps 'a few'
DLEs rather than 1 or 1000.
ug, how long will my amdump report be...
thanks,
Brian
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:59:31PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I thought we
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:31:15AM -0400, tkimball wrote:
You'll want to be careful around Sun LDOMs; They don't have a tx in the
filesystem designation:
Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0d0s0 8261657 4113861 406518051%/
Related but
I am running amanda 1.6.1.p1 on Solaris 10/x86.
The only client is the server itself.
There are 17 DLEs in amanda's disklist, while only 15 mount points
are listed, I'd divided /stations (it needs to be divided differently
but that is a negligable issue).
I am running zfs-snapshots with server
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:54:56PM -0700, Dominic Lepiane wrote:
Dear list
With our Amanda setup, we've got two tape autoloaders attached to two
separate servers. I had initially tried to run both autoloaders on 1
server, but they were giving me a lot of trouble so we went with two
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:02:21PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:03:04PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
flying wild guess -- the 3rd DLE was split? So is part on tape 1 and
part on tape 2?
Tape spanning isn't enabled, unless it is by default in the
latest release
6 DLEs taped, 3 to the first tape and 4 to the second ?
SUMMARY part real estimated
size size
partition : 17
estimated : 17 1480735m
flush : 0 0m
failed : 00m
on my LTO drive would be
great, if I wasn't obsoleting those drives soon (don't apply
to my amanda servers that don't have jukeboxes, and my smallest
juke has LTO), but spanning on LTO4 ? That is a lot of data.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:26:06PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote
Amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris 10/Sparc
Amanda 2.6.1, Solaris 10x86
Server has 21 clients with a total of 109 DLEs.
One of the client systems has 51 DLEs, 1 ufs and 50 zfs partitions.
The partitions/DLE are all part of the same ZFS pool, which
I believe (listening to another discussion earlier this
Here is a fun thought question.
Assuming that we are running daily snapshots for the purposes
of easing file restores and providing recovery for users that
accidently remove files they still need (or corrupt spreadsheets
or whatever they do)... daily snapshots on a rolling basis.
/usr1 has
Well, looks like we shot ourselves in the foot.
disklist - finsen /export zfs-snapshot
[finsen] ~ 61 cd /exp*
[finsen]: /export ls
home/ pax/ samba/ source/ testing/ zones/
Looks like it'll backup everything - however if you create
additional mountpoints...
[finsen]: /export zfs list
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Well, looks like we shot ourselves in the foot.
disklist - finsen /export zfs-snapshot
[finsen] ~ 61 cd /exp*
[finsen]: /export ls
home/ pax/ samba/ source/ testing/ zones/
Looks like
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:58:04PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Well, looks like we shot ourselves in the foot.
disklist - finsen /export zfs-snapshot
[finsen] ~ 61
What is the recommended solution to this problem ?
sendbackup: time 473.920: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Warning - block 2801050268
is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s6'
sendbackup: time 473.920: 93: normal(|): DUMP: Warning - block 2934464164
is beyond the end of `/dev/rdsk/c3t0d0s6'
Dustin,
Thank you - failure to read critically, I had to install an updated
curl on the system .2 needed .4, and I was just looking for
unresolved libraries, didn't take the next step.
Thank you, will update and try again.
I'm not sure I understand where this came from though...
something in
and does amcheck,
so its time to kick off an amdump run.
thank you,
Brian
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:06:09AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Dustin,
Thank you - failure to read critically, I had to install
# ls -l amandad
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 41436 Aug 14 13:16 amandad
There is something going on here that I clearly do not understand.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:57:39PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I'm not at all certain I understand this.
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 2 hostname
curie
I'm not at all certain I understand this.
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 2 hostname
curie
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 3 pwd
curie:/usr/local/libexec/amanda
[curie] /usr/local/libexec/amanda 4 ldd amandad
libamandad-2.6.1p1.so =
Chris,
We will remove the old libraries, that should take care of it.
for completeness though, I just don't understand why
we get two different results in the same binary ?
Actually, for the binary on Curie we only search for
object=libamandad-2.6.1p1.so, where on Cascade we
seem to be
I've copied my installation from Solaris 10x86 to another
solaris 10x86 (2.6.1 with patches).
Seemed to be ok, all load libraries present, but an error when
I try to run amlabel.
The named .so file is present, the correct version of Perl seems
to be there...
ls -l
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:02:12PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
I installed on Cascade using the compilation that I created for/on Curie.
The # make install seemed to go well.
Try running ldd on libDebug.so?
Dustin,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:52:23PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
I'm sure its something minor...but I'm not seeing it.
libDebug.so should require libamanda.so -- is that requirement in
place? and
.
thanks,
Brian
- Forwarded message from Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org -
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:37:35 -0400
From: Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org
To: daver da...@wadsworth.org, amanda-users@amanda.org,
Chris Knight kni
having good backups
to start.
Apreciate your helping us out of yet another situation we
created ourselves.
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
cool thanks.
its working, but its crawling.
20 minutes and little actual data moved. Which I realized
is not an amanda issue.
mailserv:/usr1 0
Our shop is running with zfs-snapshots.
We don't/haven't attempted ufs-snapshots.
Snapshots are great - but not the solution to all problems,
files that are open when the snapshots are created are 'open'
when you back them up (not everyone here seems to understand this).
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at
Reviewing the issue.
Server, Solaris 10x86, Amanda 2.6.1 (with patches)
Client, Solaris 9, Amanda 2.4.4
The problem performing level 0 dumps is that there are a large
number of files in flux -- its the mailhost system -- so ufsdump
eventually asks for help, to continue or quit.
There is no
PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
what are the values for
dumpcycle
runspercycle
runtapes
tapecycle
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:45:46PM -0400, Sam Hooker wrote:
...
[r...@inara NOISEPLANT]# for opt in dumpcycle
| grep
changer-config; done
[r...@inara NOISEPLANT]#
Cheers,
- -sth
sam hooker|s...@noiseplant.com|http://www.noiseplant.com
We're the Internet's old guard: Paralyzed on the
event horizon of the black hole that is
social networking...
- - Brian Cuttler br
Continuation of previous initiated thread.
Server, Solaris 10/x86 amanda 2.6.1p1, I believe -20090227
Client, also 2.6.1p1, Solaris 10/Sparc.
Have reduced maxdumps to 3, client still hanging...
[lyra] ~ 117 ps -ef | grep amanda
amanda 9087 7436 0- ? 0:00 defunct
Tried a truss with Dustin last week, hung, I believe he said
at a wait for a signal from the server, if you tell me how to
run a backtrace I'll be happy to forward the output.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:45:30AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Brian,
Can you run a debugger on the live
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:52:43AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Type the 'where' command in gdb:
$ gdb -p 7436
where
quit
The server always runs down 'normally', output was in today's first email.
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Tried a truss with Dustin last week, hung, I
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:51:44AM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
If only it was that simple... mailserv is our mailhub, cyrus imap,
individual files/email plus index, virus scanner (sophos)... we
see a couple of
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
| ? DUMP: NEEDS ATTENTION: Do you want to attempt to continue? (yes or
no) ? DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted.
There look to be a number of funny
(0x000A0278, 1, 0xFFBFF988, 0x) (sleeping...)
pollsys(0x000A0278, 1, 0xFFBFF988, 0x) = 0
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Tried a truss with Dustin last week, hung, I believe he said
at a wait for a signal from the server, if you tell me how to
run a backtrace I'll be happy
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:52:43AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Type the 'where' command in gdb:
$ gdb -p 7436
where
quit
pollsys(0x000A0278, 1, 0xFFBFF988, 0x) (sleeping...)
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Tried a truss with Dustin last week, hung, I believe he said
Amanda users,
I just met with my manager and he offered me a new tape drive,
an SL48, with 2 LTO4 drives.
It was my understanding that amanda will use tape drives RAIT,
moving its output stream from one drive to the other when the
tape in the first drive becomes full. If I understand, this is
a
:32PM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Can you apply the attached patch to lyra?
And run the following command on the amand server:
$ amdump curie lyra / -otapedev=/no/such/device -otpchanger=
Post the complete sendbackup.*.debug file
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Continuation
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:44:30PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:32:20AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
my god... that was a hell of a guess. Thank you !
That's it, Dustin and Jean Louis guess to come up with
their insightful answers. Its not analysis based
# amadmin configname force
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:16:49PM -0500, Brandon Metcalf wrote:
d == dus...@zmanda.com writes:
d On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Brandon
d Metcalfbran...@geronimoalloys.com wrote:
d I had to rebuild the disk array where our vtapes were stored. ??After I
I have an older version of amanda 2.4.4 on a Solaris 10/sparc server.
It is both client and server.
Oddly, planner seems to be trying to backup clep:/xerox DLE, which
was removed from the disklist 2 years ago... I guess its been running
so smoothly and successfully that we never looked closely
-0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I have an older version of amanda 2.4.4 on a Solaris 10/sparc server.
It is both client and server.
Oddly, planner seems to be trying to backup clep:/xerox DLE, which
was removed from the disklist 2 years ago... I guess its been running
so smoothly
Jean,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:31:14AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Do you have a dump on holding disk?
Yes, Dustin and you where right on it!
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
I have an older version of amanda 2.4.4 on a Solaris 10/sparc server.
It is both client and server
my god... that was a hell of a guess. Thank you !
# ls -lR /am*
/amwork1:
total 20
drwx-- 2 root root8192 Oct 20 2004 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 512 Oct 13 2006 restore
drwxr-xr-x 2 amanda sys 512 Jul 14 22:04 work
/amwork1/lost+found:
total
Dustin,
I was playing with dividing a large DLE, 270Gig (which is yet another
thread for this same server) and started a run yesterday morning, so
the PM run with maxdumps reduced from 4 to 3 did not run last night.
The client is in a 'good' state, so we should be set for tonight,
but a known
Server is Solaris 10 x86 (on an X4500), Amanda 2.6.1p1
Lyra client is the same version on also running Solaris 10, but
Sparc, on a T1000.
Both Lyra:/ and Curie:/ are standard comp-root, ufs file systems.
(Other DLEs on both systems use zfs-snapshots).
(amnda client) Lyra has defunct jobs again.
Dustin,
The job on the server completes, the amandad on the client
does not terminate, causing the 'dump' failures following
days on the particular client.
There is no apparent ill effect on the server (nor does the issue
on this client seem to affect other clients, but one wouldn't expect
Yes, when I killed the days-old amandad the zombies went away
and the subequent amdump ran fine. I just don't know why the
zombies recurred.
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 04:03:32PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Good news,
Not sure if this is your issue, but...
I've had some funny issues when I've been unable to resolve
client names, or clients not properly resolving amanda server
names, as in when the amanda client is a solaris zone or in
an odd segement of my network.
I never rely on localhost and always use
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:47:50PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Does amanda check port restrictions against max_client ? should it ?
This kind of got dropped.. Jean-Louis, what do you think about this
suggestion?
I am perfroming dump from Solaris 10 x86, using amanda 2.6.1
to an SL24/LTO4.
The following is cronological, some of the issues are separable.
The particular client with the issue is a MAC server with over
250Gig of data.
The dumps where taking a _lot_ time, so I tried to divide the DLE
into 2
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 12:14:47PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Brian Cuttlerbr...@wadsworth.org wrote:
amrestore /dev/rmt/0n trel
amrestore: 7: skipping FILE: date 20090702183001 host nlascar disk /boot
lev 1 comp .gz program /sbin/dump
amrestore:
wondering if amanda allowed me to shoot myself in the foot.
Does amanda check port restrictions against max_client ? should it ?
thank you,
Brian
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:38:42PM -0400, Brian Cuttler
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:28:34PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2009-06-30 19:52, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
So, the question is, if Amanda has more than one holding disk
(partition), and they differ in size, will Amanda know when the
smaller one is inadequate for a
Chris,
Amanda uses chunksize to break a DLE in the holding area down
into managable pieces (you can set the chunksize per holding area).
You do not need single spindle holding areas that are large enough
to contain whole DLEs (anymore, at one time this was true).
You do still want a large
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:05:54PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Chris,
Amanda uses chunksize to break a DLE in the holding area down
into managable pieces (you can set the chunksize per holding area).
You do not need single spindle holding areas that are large enough
to contain whole
I am running amanda server 2.6.1p1 on a Solaris x86 x4500 to an
SL24/LTO4 jukebox.
I'm seeing a couple of odd (and intermittent) problems with one
of the clients. Another Solaris box, with a ZFS file system.
Most partitions backup ok, but here are some extracts from last
nights amdump run.
The
Andreas,
The type device is described in # man st(7D).
Amanda has a value in amanda.conf called labelstr
(One) of mine looks like this
labelstr ^INFO[0-9][0-9]*$
that is (starts with) INFO and has at least two numerics (then ends)
I believe there are newer faster ways to label tapes, even a
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:53:03PM +0200, Andreas Kuntzagk wrote:
Hi,
I have another on: should I make the amandabackup user the owner of the
changer device file or is there a better way to enable access to the
changer for the amanda programs?
I don't think I've ever had to alter the
We have a tendance to JASS our systems to secure them, amanda
ends up in an uninitialized state, with an enabled service and
no errors in its config, because JASS disables INETD. You have
to walk a whole new chain to find the errors these days.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Paul
to creation of non-global zones.
JASS itself installs as a package from SUN.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 02:20:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Brian Cuttler wrote:
We have a tendance to JASS our systems to secure them, amanda
ends up in an uninitialized state
I have a Tandberg T24 jukebox with an LTO4 scsi connected
to a linux server. I don't recall where I got the tapetype
definition, might have stolen it from my SL24/LTO4 fiber
connected to my Sun x4500... but I don't know where I got
that from... I know I didn't build it. I wonder now if its
not
you know how I make out with the install/patch
when I return.
Thank you,
Brian
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46:21AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:04:21PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote
you know how I make out with the install/patch
when I return.
Thank you,
Brian
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46:21AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:04:21PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
# more
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:04:21PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
# more chunker.20090409164847.debug
That's a chunker debug log -- do you have a dumper debug log?
dumper.20090409164847.debug or something similar
I'm trying to migrate an amanda client, SGI/IRIX with amanda 2.4.1p1
from server Solaris 9 with amanda 2.4.4 to a server Solaris 10 with
amanda 2.6.1.
I have an error, but don't see anything standing out in the client's
/tmp/amanda tree.
FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
everest /images3 lev 0 FAILED
Dustin,
Jean-Louis,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:37:24PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
? everest /images3 lev 0 ?FAILED [dumper1 died]
Check the dumper debug logs on the server, rather than the client.
# more
Jean-Louis,
I'm not sure I understand what has happened, but we have a
successful level 0 with ZFS snapshot on that difficult partition.
I don't know if the move to a 'local' connection helped with that,
though it clearly affected the creation of the amandad.debug files.
I don't like
??
thanks,
Brian
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 03:09:16PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I really am confused...
When we set up amanda I configured amanda to have priv to
perform snapshots
mountpoint griffyp/csssoft|
1238176877.61: Amzfs_snapshot: running: /usr/bin/pfexec /usr/sbin/zfs
snapshot griffyp/csss...@amanda-_griffyp_csssoft-check
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Ok, scratched my head a little and thought about was what different
between testing in-preproduction and now
/virologypt 1048576 16222 1032353 2%/griffyp/virologypt
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:16:52AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I'm sure this worked before I put the system into production.
Amanda 2.6.1, Solaris 10/x86, ZFS with snapshots.
I don't know how I have have no DLE to backup
and I'll initiate amdump.
thank you,
Brian
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
I am running Amanda 2.6.1-20090227 on Solaris 10 with ZFS and
snapshots !! to an LTO4 in a SL24 jukebox.
I'm
I'm sure this worked before I put the system into production.
Amanda 2.6.1, Solaris 10/x86, ZFS with snapshots.
I don't know how I have have no DLE to backup, unless there
is some failure in producing the snapshot.
Now that the system is in production we are running samba with
about a dozen
I am running Amanda 2.6.1-20090227 on Solaris 10 with ZFS and
snapshots !! to an LTO4 in a SL24 jukebox.
I'm trying to add some remote clients, starting with the one
that gives me the most trouble. Moving the MAC with 300 Gig
of storage to the x4500 amanda platform with the Gig interface
and
I'm running amanda 2.6.1 on Solaris 10/x86 and having a problem with
my test of a file restore.
tapedev is /dev/rmt/0hn, its an LTO4, should probably just use /dev/rmt/0n.
Tape is imbedded in an SL24 jukebox, the the problem doesn't seem related
to the robot.
Interestingly, same version was
Well, the amcheck did complete, after running through 23 tapes.
I have slots 1-23 configured in the config file, just surprised
me that we examined 23 tapes rather than 23 slots. It termined
just fine, dispite going over the 10 loaded tapes 2+ times.
===
Hi guys,
I'll detail the
Sorry to bother you all again, 2.6.1 on Solaris 10 Sparc tested
out good but the build on Solaris 10 x86 is hitting a road block.
I believe I have a sufficient version of GLIB, I know it tests
for 2.2.0 but I believe I have 2.4.1 (which is greater for most
tests, see note below).
# pkg-config
Successful run of the new version yesterday, performing a new
run this morning with autoflush (production capacity tape drive
is on the current production system).
Ran amstatus and noted an error, thought I'd pass it on. Please
let me know what additional detail I can provide.
I do not consider
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:13:40AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
This bug is already fixed.
Fix will be in 2.6.1p1.
Cool! thanks.
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Successful run of the new version yesterday, performing a new
run this morning with autoflush (production capacity tape
Thank you all for your help.
output of ldd is
ldd /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/auto/Amanda/Config/libConfig.so
libamglue.so = /usr/local/lib/amanda/libamglue.so
libamanda-2.4.5.so =/opt/sfw/lib/libamanda-2.4.5.so
libm.so.2 = /usr/lib/libm.so.2
Dustin,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:16:38AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
I did a # make uninstall, I'd thought before the build, but I
ran it a number of times across a number of builds... do I need
to run the make
,
Brian
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Yes! leaving the /opt/sfw/lib out of the path entirely seems to have
done the trick, we linked against the correct library and I can now
proceed with the next level of errors.
Could have sworn I saw something about this on the list last week
and I am
Chris,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 04:15:09PM -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
Where is libcrypto.so? I'm guessing under /opt/sfw/lib. Note,
regarding --with-libraries:
--with-libraries=LIBRARY-DIRS
deprecated; use ./configure
chance the library path issue is related to the suid bit ?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 09:37:47AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Chris,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 04:15:09PM -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
Where is libcrypto.so? I'm guessing under /opt/sfw/lib. Note
My apologies. I'm slow sometimes.
I was told to use the -R flag and I didn't know how, botched it,
ignored (dropped it) and caused my own problems.
the config should have looked like this...
#./configure LDFLAGS='-L/usr/sfw/lib -L/opt/sfw/lib -L/usr/local/lib/amanda \
-R/usr/sfw/lib
Clearly I'm doing something stupid, but I don't see it.
Trying to build latest because we want to take advantage of
ZFS Snapshots, moving to Solaris ZFS, especially for things
like samba shares.
Downloaded new kit yesterday, expanded under /tmp
# printenv PATH
there are circumstances when someone would want to
allow record yes when doing this, I decided that my setup
wasn't one of them.
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:00:51PM -0800, Paul Yeatman wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 11:53 -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Anderson,
I do something similar. Having an LTO3 what we don't
Amanda users,
I'm running amanda 2.4.4 on Solaris 9, I have multiple clients
on the system, but one of the clients, ironically client == server
see Request to 'client' timed out errors periodically. We see
these perhaps once every couple of weeks, but because of the data
volume it really throws
I've been backing up virtual hosts on Solaris.
There are a couple of ways...
If the virtual, er, lets use the proper vendor terms
because they connote specific non-transferable things.
In some cases I can backup my non-global zones from the
global zone amanda client. This is fine if the whole
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:08:21PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
With faster tape drives it is not uncommon to get taper transfer rates
above 100MiBs. amreport will then fill the entry Avg Tp Write Rate
(k/s) with '#.#' as reporter.c shows at line 821 for 2.6.0p2. My
great
g00f,
Don't know if this appies to you but...
but for my site we have a number of configs where we use HW
rather than SW compression.
We have the tape length set to the tape capacity and have not
altered it to account for the (somewhat unpredictable) value
of HW compression at the drive.
So
I'd thought there was a switch on make, so that you could
# make install-client
or something along these lines.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:01:55AM +0100, Prashant Ramhit wrote:
Thomas Linton wrote:
I compiled the 2.6.0p2. This includes Server and Client. How do I
separate them? I don't want
I don't know where I got that (bugus) memory from, but checking
the Makefile I clearly do NOT find such a target.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:51:47AM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Brian Cuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd thought there was a switch on make
Prashant,
I most recently compiled amanda on Solaris, because I want
to re-compile as rairly as possible I include anything that
I am likely to require later on.
That would include port restrictions for FW systems, tar
for partitions that aren't amenable to being dumped, either
too large and
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:11:34PM -0400, conandor wrote:
ya. i running it on smf instead of xinetd.
any idea how can i configure it to work?
If I understand the issue...
I add the amanda entries to /etc/services and /etc/inetd.conf,
then when I hup inetd and check the system messages file,
I had that problem also, not the linking but when it came time
to run # amcheck.
--with-libraries=/opt/sfw/lib
I resolved it by recompiling, with an additional ./configure option.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:19:35AM -0400, Krahn, Anderson wrote:
Problem was with a library
Chris,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:12:38PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
You are right - and I did install it, now to find out why it
doesn't seem to want to run... missing a library, shouldn't
be a big deal.
It needs libiconv.
yup, installed libintl-3.4.0-sol10-sparc-local and that
Robert,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:16:29AM -0400, McGraw, Robert P wrote:
I want to be able to use a different disklist for different runs. Other than
use shell scripting to mv disklista to disklist is there a way to tell
amanda what disklist to use during a run.
What needs to remain the same
Yes, actually we are putting zfs partitions under the samba
server and one of the oracle servers is solaris under the
database partitions.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:42:29PM +0200, Nick Smith wrote:
Be aware that there isn't an offical beta (i.e. tagged versions) as yet
- it's a snapshot of
301 - 400 of 776 matches
Mail list logo
