> > >Hang on guys,
> > >
> > >I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly!
> >
> > Yeah, this got a little confusing. Sorry 'bout that.
> >
> > My advice is to wait for Alexandre, Jean-Louis and I to stop publicly
> > arguing with each other :-) and come to an agreement on t
> >Hang on guys,
> >
> >I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly!
>
> Yeah, this got a little confusing. Sorry 'bout that.
>
> My advice is to wait for Alexandre, Jean-Louis and I to stop publicly
> arguing with each other :-) and come to an agreement on the fix.
> Then I
Hang on guys,
I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly!
The patch described below and the previous simple patch have not yet been
applied to any of my systems.
I have only done a basic make of getfsent and sent the un modified (or P2
distribution) results of getfsent to
>From: Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri Apr 6, 2001 3:24am
>Subject: Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives
>On Apr 5, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The sendsize*debug file reveals that the client is trying to use
>>dump
>> instead of vdump upon an advfs file system!
>> H
>>I have configured the system so that amcheck is happy, but amdump
>>reports disk is offline.
>>
>>I have set the device permissions like so:
>>
>>brw-r root system /dev/vol/rootvol (logical volume)
>Is your Amanda user (the one inetd/xinetd runs amandad as) in group
>"system"?
>What's
Has anybody any experience with backing up LSM drives using Amanda?
I have configured the system so that amcheck is happy, but amdump
reports disk is offline.
I have set the device permissions like so:
brw-r root system /dev/vol/rootvol (logical volume)
crw-r root system /dev/rvol/
