Thanks for the suggestions.
I will make sure I change the --with-user and --with-group options before
this goes into production.
On the --with-db=gdbm issue, your also right. Setting --with-db=text gets
around this issue completely and this is probably the way I will go.
Just for kicks
Is gdbm support just broken in this release? ...
I'm sure that's the case.
Has anyone found a solution to this problem?
As I said, if you can get by without out, that's probably the way to go.
If you can't, then I'll take a look when I get back from a conference
next week (or someone else can
