Re: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-02-02 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:44:47PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: This one time, at band camp, Paul Bijnens wrote: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: what are some good options for long term archival storage? Someone stole my crystal ball... Or did he mean amanda.conf options ? I was inquiring of

Re: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-02-01 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Paul Bijnens wrote: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: what are some good options for long term archival storage? Someone stole my crystal ball... Or did he mean amanda.conf options ?

Re: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-31 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: what are some good options for long term archival storage? Someone stole my crystal ball... ok. :) -- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Engineer I Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025

Re: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-31 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 01:59:32PM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: what are some good options for long term archival storage? There's only one: redundancy! I don't know the answer to the question you're actually asking. All the media I know of are either not great under typical,

Re: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-29 Thread Paul Bijnens
Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: what are some good options for long term archival storage? Someone stole my crystal ball... -- Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511 Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leuven, BELGIUMFax +32 16 397.512 http://www.xplanation.com/

AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-28 Thread Sebastian Kösters
Ok. I must label every tape to get a working index. But I only have DailySet100 up to DailySet199. What happened when I'am at 199 and want to label the next tape? I think I have to start at DailySet100 again but what happened with the index/tape that was DailySet100 before? Which is the best way

Re: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-28 Thread Paul Bijnens
Sebastian Kösters wrote: Ok. I must label every tape to get a working index. But I only have DailySet100 up to DailySet199. What happened when I'am at 199 and want to label the next tape? I think I have to start at DailySet100 again but what happened with the index/tape that was DailySet100

AW: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-28 Thread Sebastian Kösters
Thank you! Now i only need to know how to make it automaticly ;) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Bijnens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Januar 2005 12:40 An: Sebastian Kösters Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org Betreff: Re: AW: archiving tapes?! Sebastian Kösters wrote

Re: AW: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-28 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
: Re: AW: archiving tapes?! [...] If it is really for permanent archiving, you can label the tapes like: ARCH-2005-JAN-30 (there is no requirement that labels must follow numerically or alphabetically): labelstr ARCH-[0-9][0-9][0-9]-[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z]-[0-9][0-9] Use the FORMAT feature

Re: AW: AW: archiving tapes?!

2005-01-28 Thread Paul Bijnens
Sebastian Kösters wrote: Now i only need to know how to make it automaticly ;) You still need to manually insert the tape, manually write/print and stick a label on the tape, and manually put the tape in the box of course. Labelling has to be done only once. :-) #!/bin/sh # datelabel: label new