amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Portwine
client inetd[435]: /usr/local/libexec/amandad (pid 2480): exit status 127Aug 11 08:32:27client inetd[435]: amanda/udp server failing (looping or being flooded), service terminated for 10 min The first two lines are actually repeated a whole bunch of times before the final message... Any idea what

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Paul Bijnens
2479): exit status 127 Aug 11 08:32:27 client inetd[435]: /usr/local/libexec/amandad (pid 2480): exit status 127 Aug 11 08:32:27 client inetd[435]: amanda/udp server failing (looping or being flooded), service terminated for 10 min The first two lines are actually repeated a whole bunch of times

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Portwine
amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/local/libexec/amandad amandad Or was it nowait, and you changed it to wait (or fixed the username backup), but forgot to sig-HUP the inetd process after you fixed it? No, I added the inetd entry as listed above and then actually rebooted the machine to

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:36:21AM -0400, Jeff Portwine enlightened us: amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/local/libexec/amandad amandad Or was it nowait, and you changed it to wait (or fixed the username backup), but forgot to sig-HUP the inetd process after you fixed it? No, I added

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Portwine
That was my first thought too, but /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf Have you the directory /usr/local/lib listed on /etc/ld.so.conf? This file is a kind of path for finding libraries. You probably don't have it. After adding it you have to run ldconfig to update the cache used

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread rom
Jeff Portwine wrote: What happens when you execute the command /usr/local/libexec/amandad as user backup manually? $ /usr/local/libexec/amandad /usr/local/libexec/amandad: error in loading shared libraries: libamclient-2.5.0p2.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:36:21AM -0400, Jeff Portwine wrote: amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/local/libexec/amandad amandad Or was it nowait, and you changed it to wait (or fixed the username backup), but forgot to sig-HUP the inetd process after you fixed it? No, I added the inetd

Re: amanda client inetd problem - solved

2006-08-11 Thread Jeff Portwine
I guess the problem was simply that it couldn't find the libraries in /usr/local/lib afterall, though I don't really know why. I tried making a symbolic link in /usr/lib to all the libam libraries in /usr/local/lib and it fixed the problem I was having.Maybe just running ldconfig would

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, rom wrote: Jeff Portwine wrote: What happens when you execute the command /usr/local/libexec/amandad as user backup manually? $ /usr/local/libexec/amandad /usr/local/libexec/amandad: error in loading shared libraries: libamclient-2.5.0p2.so: cannot open shared

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 11 August 2006 09:53, Jeff Portwine wrote: That was my first thought too, but /usr/local/lib is already in /etc/ld.so.conf Did you run, by hand, and as root, the ldconfig command to update those links? I have to do this when I install a new snapshot of amanda. Always. Have you the

Re: amanda client inetd problem - solved

2006-08-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 11 August 2006 10:22, Jeff Portwine wrote: I guess the problem was simply that it couldn't find the libraries in /usr/local/lib afterall, though I don't really know why. I tried making a symbolic link in /usr/lib to all the libam libraries in /usr/local/lib and it fixed the problem I

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Frank Smith
Jon LaBadie wrote: From a few things I'm guessing that both client and server are running on linux systems. Out of curiosity, which distros still use inetd rather than xinetd? Debian still uses inetd by default, although xinetd and several other variants are available as optional packages.

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 11 August 2006 10:21, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:36:21AM -0400, Jeff Portwine wrote: amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/local/libexec/amandad amandad Or was it nowait, and you changed it to wait (or fixed the username backup), but forgot to sig-HUP the inetd

Re: amanda client inetd problem

2006-08-11 Thread Frank Smith
Gene Heskett wrote: The debian camp and its offspring ubuntu, hasn't made the switch yet that I'm aware of. I just installed kubuntu-6.06 on my milling machines box so I could stay reasonably well synched with the emc2 cvs, and was amazed that the default install was still using inetd, or

Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localhost?

2005-04-25 Thread Vlad Popa
Hi from Austria! I was wondering, if it might be possible to reduce the open ports induced by amanda to the local IP address (interface lo, 127.0.0.1) in inetd.conf since I thought using amanda client and server on the same machine. External nmap port scans of this server should not find any

RE: Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localho st?

2005-04-25 Thread donald . ritchey
it!!! Donald L. (Don) Ritchey Information Technology Exelon Corporation -Original Message- From: Vlad Popa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 12:42 PM To: amanda-users@amanda.org Subject: Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localhost? Hi from Austria! I

Re: Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localho st?

2005-04-25 Thread Toomas Aas
only client - the less ports open to the network, the better. One obvious way to achieve this is to use your favourite firewall package. It may be also possible to achieve this with the means of inetd (amanda services are started from there), but I'm not sure of that. Surely inetd documentation

Re: Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localho st?

2005-04-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:04:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vlad: Please review the Amanda archives for discussions of the pitfalls of using localhost as part of your backup configuration. This is a subject that has been beaten into submission quite thoroughly. The short answer

Re: Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localho st?

2005-04-25 Thread Peter Mueller
Hi from Austria too! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Don't do it!!! ... Subject: Is it possible to configure amanda and inetd just for localhost? Is it a linux box ? Define some iptable rules or similar to block access from other IP addresses. Bye, Peter WOTLmade

Amanda and inetd

2001-03-09 Thread Raymond Bramwell
Hi there! I'm new to amanda and have just been trying to install it from source, unfortunately I don't know what entries need to go into /etc/inetd.conf on either the server or client machines. Could somebody let me know what I need to put there on the client and on the server (which will also

Re: Amanda and inetd

2001-03-09 Thread John R. Jackson
I'm new to amanda and have just been trying to install it from source, unfortunately I don't know what entries need to go into /etc/inetd.conf on either the server or client machines. Have you read docs/INSTALL and http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html? In brief, you need amanda/amandad on

Re: Amanda and inetd

2001-03-09 Thread Raymond Bramwell
That's an excellent suggestion... read the docs! Don't I feel like a bean! Thanx =) "John R. Jackson" wrote: I'm new to amanda and have just been trying to install it from source, unfortunately I don't know what entries need to go into /etc/inetd.conf on either the server or client