Amanda users,
do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
This is just test, no production cycle yet.
Original Message
Subject: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:36:20 +0100 (MET)
From: Amanda Operator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eugen Leitl wrote:
do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
This is just test, no production cycle yet.
All fine.
planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead.
Are you sure you want to run with a dumpcycle that large?
Dumpcyle != tapecycle. Actually
On Monday 09 February 2004 09:57, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Amanda users,
do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
This is just test, no production cycle yet.
Original Message
Subject: DailySet1 AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR February 9, 2004
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004
On Monday 09 February 2004 10:57, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Eugen Leitl wrote:
do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
This is just test, no production cycle yet.
All fine.
planner: Full dump of u03:/var promoted from 25 days ahead.
Are you sure you want to run with a
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:57:31PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Amanda users,
do you see anything in below report that raises your eyebrows?
This is just test, no production cycle yet.
-- -
u03 -xport/home 1
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote
I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits
to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point. Do I really care if
the tape rate was 975.8 KB/sec as compared to 976? Or that u07's /var FS
compressed to 43.2
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote
I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits
to having zero decimal digits and no decimal point. Do I really care if
the tape rate was
On Monday 09 February 2004 11:09, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Gene,
on Montag, 09. Februar 2004 at 17:03 you wrote to amanda-users:
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p1)
2.4.4p2 is out too :-)
GH So is 2.4.5p1, works great here. :-)
I only see 2.4.5b1 here ... are you ahead of us?
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 12:21pm, Jon LaBadie wrote
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote
I also go into the source and change the columns with single decimal digits
to having zero decimal digits and no
On Monday 09 February 2004 12:21, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 11:51am, Jon LaBadie wrote
I also go into the source and change the columns with single
decimal digits to having zero decimal digits and no decimal
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 12:51pm, Gene Heskett wrote
Actually, I've heard that if its only off by point double ought zip,
thats close enough for the girls I go with! :)
Around here we can say good enough for gov't work and mean it, given
that most of our grants come from the gov't.
With that,
On Monday 09 February 2004 12:59, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 at 12:51pm, Gene Heskett wrote
Actually, I've heard that if its only off by point double ought
zip, thats close enough for the girls I go with! :)
Around here we can say good enough for gov't work and mean it,
12 matches
Mail list logo
