On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> * Jean-Louis Martineau [20170119 10:29]:
> > On 19/01/17 09:49 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > > Hi,,
> ...
> > >
> > >
> > > Question: are they any drawbacks, performance, etc, when setting
> > > property "ATIME-PRESERV
On 19/01/17 12:36 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> * Jean-Louis Martineau [20170119 10:29]:
>> On 19/01/17 09:49 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
>>> Hi,,
> ...
>>>
>>> Question: are they any drawbacks, performance, etc, when setting
>>> property "ATIME-PRESERVE" "NO" ?
>> The atime of each file
* Jean-Louis Martineau [20170119 10:29]:
> On 19/01/17 09:49 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > Hi,,
...
> >
> >
> > Question: are they any drawbacks, performance, etc, when setting
> > property "ATIME-PRESERVE" "NO" ?
> The atime of each file/dir tar read will be modified, that's means many
>
On 19/01/17 09:49 AM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> I've got this FreeBSD 11.0 box (virtual at the moment but will become
> real metal soon) for which I've installed an Amanda client (v3.3.6) and
> while testing it, tar (GNU tar) 1.29 complains when the Amanda run is
> started with (amgta
Hi,,
I've got this FreeBSD 11.0 box (virtual at the moment but will become
real metal soon) for which I've installed an Amanda client (v3.3.6) and
while testing it, tar (GNU tar) 1.29 complains when the Amanda run is
started with (amgtar debug file):
amgtar: Spawning "/usr/local/bin/gtar /usr/loc
