Re: Running amcheck during amdump

2012-10-11 Thread Toomas Aas
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 Toomas Aas wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Charles Curley wrote: I believe running amcheck during an amdump run is a harmless error. It doesn't probably do any harm, but it turns out that in this case the mail report is still sent, containing these warnings: WARNING:

Re: Running amcheck during amdump

2012-10-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:15:15PM +0300, Toomas Aas wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 Toomas Aas wrote: On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Charles Curley wrote: I believe running amcheck during an amdump run is a harmless error. It doesn't probably do any harm, but it turns out that in this case the

Re: Running amcheck during amdump

2012-10-11 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 20:15:15 +0300, Toomas Aas wrote: Which leads me to next question - what is the best way to detect, in a script, that amdump or amflush is running? Off the top of my head I can only think of something like 'ps | grep amdump', but that doesn't seem very elegant. I tried

Re: Running amcheck during amdump

2012-10-10 Thread Toomas Aas
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Charles Curley wrote: I believe running amcheck during an amdump run is a harmless error. It doesn't probably do any harm, but it turns out that in this case the mail report is still sent, containing these warnings: WARNING: skipping tape test because amdump or

Re: Running amcheck during amdump

2012-10-09 Thread Toomas Aas
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 Charles Curley wrote: However, I suspect that swapping out the vtape drive will cause problems for amanda. For example, if you try a restore but the file to be restored is on the swapped out disk, amanda will likely get confused. It will be looking for a vtape that isn't