Cameron Matheson wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
devdb.tons /dev/ida/c0d0p2 lev 0 FAILED [disk
/dev/ida/c0d0p2 offline on
devdb.tonservices.com?]
gatorade.t /dev/sda6 lev 0 STRANGE
Ok, the whole /dev/ida/c0d0p2 thing is a word device i
will admit, but it's definitely not
Cameron Matheson wrote:
hmm, there is no sendbackup file... i'm assuming it
never got that file. i did look around in a few of
the other files, and the problem seems to be here at
how it's running tar:
/bin/tar --create --file /dev/null --directory
/dev/ida/c0d0p2
--one-file-system
--On June 2, 2005 12:05:58 PM -0700 Cameron Matheson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
devdb.tonservices.com /dev/ida/c0d0p2 root-tar
it's similar to my other clients which are all working
fine... why would it be sending this tar command? (the
other clients are all having '/' be their directory)
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Alexander Jolk wrote:
Cameron Matheson wrote:
it's similar to my other clients which are all working
fine... why would it be sending this tar command? (the
other clients are all having '/' be their directory)
Actually, I thought that you could
Hey,
you're exactly right... that box (i'm not even sure
what distro it's running... mandrake?) is also using
that weird naming scheme (i actually had to check mtab
to see what the root really was). that seems kind of
lame to do it by label instead of device file, but i
guess that's the way it
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:14:16PM -0700, gen2 wrote:
/dev/sda9 is NOT a mount point, its a descriptor only and will
probably fail forever.
now, if that disk is mounted someplace, as in /mnt/sda9 on the machine
whose alias is node1, and it is mounted when amdump runs, it should
work
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:26:57AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
If [...] you tell amanda to use a version of dump, those programs
generally work at the device level (even when told to work on a
mount point) and should be able to backup umounted partitions.
To add a bit more detail, dump does this
/dev/sda9 is NOT a mount point, its a descriptor only and will
probably fail forever.
now, if that disk is mounted someplace, as in /mnt/sda9 on the machine
whose alias is node1, and it is mounted when amdump runs, it should
work like a champ.
Ok, what I'm experiencing lends that a lot of
--On Thursday, January 08, 2004 15:51:21 +0100 Oliver Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Group !
Maybe anyone has a hint for me ?
We have about 30 Servers, all UNIX. They are all backed up with amanda,
which worked very good, until some problems occured.
I defined a TestSet an tried to
I can su to amanda and chdir to usr and everything else thats failling ?
Is it maybe because of the filesystem xfs on the target-machine ?
I think amanda wants to do a xfsdump there, right ? I tried to run it as
amanda and got it complaining to be root to run ... !?
Thanks in advance
...olli
--On Thursday, January 08, 2004 17:21:48 +0100 Oliver Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can su to amanda and chdir to usr and everything else thats failling ?
Is it maybe because of the filesystem xfs on the target-machine ?
I think amanda wants to do a xfsdump there, right ? I tried to run it
Hello again ...
Am Do, 2004-01-08 um 17.37 schrieb Frank Smith:
--On Thursday, January 08, 2004 17:21:48 +0100 Oliver Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can su to amanda and chdir to usr and everything else thats failling ?
Is it maybe because of the filesystem xfs on the target-machine ?
--On Friday, November 07, 2003 00:01:08 + Mohammad Meskarian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear All.
I have some strange report on Amanda starting after no change on
Amanda or at least I don't know what is
Changed.
I receive disk offline ?. only for remote servers.
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53, LaValley, Brian E wrote:
I have not been able to backup anything on my local system. AMANDA
reports that it thinks the disk is offline. Where should I start
looking to find out what is wrong?
Start in the disklist and get rid of any localhost entries, use only
--On Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:53:59 -0400 LaValley, Brian E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have not been able to backup anything on my local system. AMANDA reports
that it thinks the disk is offline. Where should I start looking to find
out what is wrong?
Make sure you're not trying to back
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 2:39pm, Chad Morland wrote
backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
backup.domain.com?] (I have also tried using the device
[/dev/vinum/striped])
*snip*
My backup partition is a 430G striped vinum partition on FreeBSD. I have
followed everything that
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: disk offline
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 2:39pm, Chad Morland wrote
backup. /backup lev 0 FAILED [disk /backup offline on
backup.domain.com?] (I have also tried using the device
[/dev/vinum/striped])
*snip
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 at 3:20pm, Chad Morland wrote
Error from sendsize*debug:
runtar: error [must be invoked by operator]
However, amanda is in my operator group.
torbackup# id amanda
uid=1000(amanda) gid=1000(amanda) groups=1000(amanda), 5(operator)
Are you using inetd or xinetd? If it's
: Jonathan Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 18:25
To: Spicer, Kevin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disk offline - runtar as root
borzoi 63# pwd
/usr/freeware/libexec
-rwsr-x---1 root sys21876 May 31 17:36 runtar
/etc/group:
borzoi 6% cat /etc/group
sys::0:root
cd /usr/local/libexec
chown root:amanda runtar
chmod 4750 runtar
assuming runtar is in usr/local/libexec and that the amanda user is in the amanda
group...
But... I suspect that you haven't got runtar in the right group (or the amanda user in
the right group) as your message suggests runtar
Hi!
Recently had a drive fail on a RAID I am backing up. Since replacing
the drive and re-building the RAID, amanda has been failing on all of
the partitions on this computer.
The error I see in the amanda report is the following:
hostname /dev/da0s1f lev 0 FAILED [disk
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 02:38 am, GIC MLs wrote:
I would expect this to be a frequently asked question, but after
looking through Google, I didn't see much specifically on it,
so...
My amdump email report starts out:
These dumps were to tape daily001.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is:
My amdump email report starts out:
These dumps were to tape daily001.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: daily001.
This in itself, is odd, very odd. Your amanda.conf seems to be
out of whack somehow.
Well, that could very well be, I suppose...
(brought to you by Amanda version
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 at 7:56am, Martin Oehler wrote
I got the same problem with one of my boxes.
Are there known problems with amanda and ReiserFS?
My log entries messages look like:
got result for host pc20 disk /: 0 - -1K, -1 - -1K, -1 - -1K
0: pc20 /
planner: FAILED pc20 / 0
Rainer Fuegenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After adding a new old server named fav to amanda, I keep
getting the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
It doesn't matter if the disk is specified by device file
Hi!
Hauke Fath wrote:
Rainer Fuegenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After adding a new old server named fav to amanda, I keep
getting the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
It doesn't matter if the
On 15 Jan 2002 at 2:47pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
sc01us0105 /software/amanda/share/ lev 0 FAILED [disk
/software/amanda/share/offline on sc01us0105?]
frostis.cf /export/home/setup/freeware/amanda-2.4.2p2/ lev 0 FAILED [disk
Rainer Fuegenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After adding a new old server named fav to amanda, I keep
getting the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fav/home2 lev 0 FAILED [disk /home2 offline on fav?]
It doesn't matter if the disk is specified by device file
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
bigeasy.in?]
What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on bigeasy.in?
patrick
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John R. Jackson wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
bigeasy.in?]
What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug on bigeasy.in?
patrick
ho /etc/amdumpdates not there
is it the prob ?
ok here it is :
sendsize: debug 1 pid
vxdump: WARNING: no file `/etc/dumpdates', making an empty one
vxdump: cannot create /etc/dumpdates: Permission denied
...
ho /etc/amdumpdates not there
is it the prob ?
Yes, that's the problem. Create it (as root, since it's in /etc) and
make sure your Amanda user (uid 15) has read/write
What does /tmp/amanda/* say?
Patrick LIN wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
bigeasy.in vg00_lvol5 lev 0 FAILED [disk vg00_lvol5 offline on
bigeasy.in?]
what that mean please
amcheck without errors but the report giveme that.
the client is a HP
the serveur is a sun Solaris
Ok thanks
i will let you know tomorrow
after the nigthly backup
thanks
Best Regards
Patrick
John R. Jackson wrote:
vxdump: WARNING: no file `/etc/dumpdates', making an empty one
vxdump: cannot create /etc/dumpdates: Permission denied
...
ho /etc/amdumpdates not there
is it the prob ?
Also as suggestion that somebody kindly gave me I did as root this:
[root@miro sandra]# /bin/gtar --create --file /dev/null --directory
/Local --one-file-system --listed-incremental
/usr/local/var/amanda/gnutar-lists/miro.tomandandy.com_Local_0.new
--sparse --ignore-failed-read --totals
(no size line match in above gnutar output)
That line says GNU tar terminated but did not give Amanda an answer.
What happens if you run this **as root** on that client:
/bin/gtar --create --file /dev/null --directory /Local \
--one-file-system --listed-incremental /dev/null \
On May 20, 2001, Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This appears to be a bug that triggers in a very particular
condition: when the environment is empty. It doesn't trigger with
1.12 because it just doesn't depend on librt.so.
Nope. It didn't trigger on 1.12 because it wasn't linked
#! /bin/sh
X=; export X
exec $0.exe ${1+$@}
What is ${1+$@} good for? Never seen that construction before...
On May 20, 2001, Bernhard R. Erdmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#! /bin/sh
X=; export X
exec $0.exe ${1+$@}
What is ${1+$@} good for? Never seen that construction before...
Some shells expand $@ to when $# = 0.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red
It's printed in sendsize.debug, IIRC. And in runtar.debug.
It will reference a gnutar-list-dir .new file. It's created initially
empty for level 0 estimates, and a copy of the lower level for
incremental estimates.
FWIW, I've had similar results with GNU tar 1.13.19 on Solaris 7/x86.
I've
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
kascha sdb2 lev 0 FAILED [disk sdb2 offline on kascha?]
kascha sdb1 lev 0 FAILED [disk sdb1 offline on kascha?]
kascha sda1 lev 0 FAILED [disk sda1 offline on kascha?]
Since these are my boot disk and /usr disk they arnt off
line.
40 matches
Mail list logo
