On Thursday 05 September 2002 00:52, Chris Herrmann wrote:
Thanks Gene! Hopefully you've answered my question without me
needed to ask it :o)
I'm assuming I need to upgrade tar on the client machine, not the
amanda server...?
Where ever its actually being used, which I'd assume would be both
|The 1.13-25 version is on alpha.gnu.org now for about a year, but
|the tarballs of either will compile just fine on your machines as
|long as the developer stuff is on them.
|
|FWIW, 1.13-19 is also reported to work well with amanda. I was
|automaticly recommending the latest just because its
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 at 3:29pm, greg wrote
Run Time (hrs:min)11:48
Dump Time (hrs:min) 11:42 11:42 0:01
Output Size (meg) 24171.424171.40.0
Original Size (meg) 54320.454318.32.1
Avg Compressed Size (%)44.5 44.51.5
yes - that's right. the slow part is your computer compressing the data. The
offline message is a yet to be crafted question for this list - amanda
isn't backing up the reiserfs partition on one of the machines. The drive is
a SDLT110, there are 3 servers, and a dedicated 40G holding disk. After
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 03:29:39PM -0700, greg wrote:
Does this look right?
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:06
Run Time (hrs:min)11:48
Dump Time (hrs:min)
It all depends. Does your largest disklist entry fit on your holding
disk? Look further down in your daily report and look at the times
for dumper and taper for each disklist entry. My guess is that you
are doing one or more direct to tape dumps across the network, which
can be extremely slow
You guys are right. It is that the holding disk is not big enough so amanda
is not using it.
All the network data is rsyncd to this machine and then backed up locally.
This is to have
a running mirror and a tape backup. But I do believe the problem is the
holding disk which I am
working on
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 18:53, Chris Herrmann wrote:
yes - that's right. the slow part is your computer compressing the
data. The offline message is a yet to be crafted question for
this list - amanda isn't backing up the reiserfs partition on one
of the machines. The drive is a
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gene Heskett
|Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2002 12:26
|To: Chris Herrmann; 'greg'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: statistics
|
|
|On Wednesday 04 September 2002 18:53, Chris Herrmann wrote:
|yes - that's right. the slow part is your computer compressing the
| data. The offline
