Another thing I don't quite understand, is what's the best thing to do
when I get
*** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [[writing file: No space left on device]].
Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk.
Run amflush to flush them to tape.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:39:55AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 19/04 2002 16:18 Dave Sherohman wrote:
You can do this manually by not changing tapes (or leaving the tape
drive empty) tonight, which will cause all of tonight's dumps to stay
on the holding disk (provided it's big
On 23/04 2002 17:38 Frank Smith wrote:
--On Tuesday, April 23, 2002 15:26:33 +0200 Toralf Lund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/04 2002 14:52 Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
Yes, maybe a good decision. (Although the purchase of new tapes and the
management of all of them do add up to a
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:39:55AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 19/04 2002 16:18 Dave Sherohman wrote:
You can do this manually by not changing tapes (or leaving the tape
drive empty) tonight, which will cause all of tonight's dumps to stay
on the holding disk (provided it's big
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 1:30pm, Toralf Lund wrote
Wouldn't append support be easy to implement? Seems to me that most of the
code must be there already (since Amanda writes several dumps to one tape
in its normal mode of operation.)
Lack of append support is a design decision, AIUI. The
On 23/04 2002 14:52 Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 1:30pm, Toralf Lund wrote
Wouldn't append support be easy to implement? Seems to me that most of
the
code must be there already (since Amanda writes several dumps to one
tape
in its normal mode of operation.)
Lack
At 08:26 AM 4/23/2002, Toralf Lund wrote:
[...]
I'd really prefer an auto flush mode to append support (I can't see any
need for both). That should be easy to write as well, and I can't see any
problems associated with it, in fact, I think it would increase the safety
quite a bit.
From
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 9:09am, Darin Dugan wrote
At 08:26 AM 4/23/2002, Toralf Lund wrote:
[...]
I'd really prefer an auto flush mode to append support (I can't see any
need for both). That should be easy to write as well, and I can't see any
problems associated with it, in fact, I think
--On Tuesday, April 23, 2002 08:52:51 -0400 Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 1:30pm, Toralf Lund wrote
Wouldn't append support be easy to implement? Seems to me that most of the
code must be there already (since Amanda writes several dumps to one tape
in
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
Or leave the tape out of the drive and let it go to to the holding disk,
then amflush whenever you have a full tapes worth.
Will that work ? When I use amflush I get given a list of days on which
amdump ran without a tpe for
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 5:44pm, Niall O Broin wrote
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Frank Smith wrote:
Or leave the tape out of the drive and let it go to to the holding disk,
then amflush whenever you have a full tapes worth.
Will that work ? When I use amflush I get given a
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:39:55AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 19/04 2002 16:18 Dave Sherohman wrote:
You can do this manually by not changing tapes (or leaving the tape
drive empty) tonight, which will cause all of tonight's dumps to stay
on the holding disk (provided it's big enough),
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:25:02AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote:
Well, obviously, the simple answer is run amflush, which is what I did
the last time I got this. The problem with this was that the flush
required a tape of its own, which was not what I wanted; what I really had
in mind was to
13 matches
Mail list logo
