Re: amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type

2003-01-29 Thread Tim Souder
label: Value too large for defined data type > > rewinding, writing label DailySet100, checking label > > amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type > > > > On the same tape, (after a mt rewind), I attempted a dump/restore check to > > the same ta

Re: amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type

2003-01-28 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
ta type > rewinding, writing label DailySet100, checking label > amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type > > On the same tape, (after a mt rewind), I attempted a dump/restore check to > the same tape on the same drive: > > [root@Jupiter amanda]# dump -0u -

Re: amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type

2003-01-28 Thread Tim Souder
label a tape on a > > Tandberg/Quantum SDLT 220, it produces the following error: > > > >[amanda@Jupiter amanda]$ amlabel -f DailySet1 DailySet100 > >rewinding, reading label, reading label: Value too large for > > defined data type rewinding, writing label DailySet100,

Re: amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type

2003-01-28 Thread Gene Heskett
ding label: Value too large for > defined data type rewinding, writing label DailySet100, checking > label >amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type If your amanda.conf describes the labelstring as the default, like this: labelstr "^DailySet1-[0-9][0-9]*$&quo

amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type

2003-01-28 Thread Tim Souder
DailySet100, checking label amlabel: reading label: Value too large for defined data type On the same tape, (after a mt rewind), I attempted a dump/restore check to the same tape on the same drive: [root@Jupiter amanda]# dump -0u -a -f /dev/nst0 -L "Jupiter:/" / DUMP: Date of this level 0 dum