Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:50:59AM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: > >It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must < 100 to > >trust the dump in the holding disk. > > Are you saying all Denise has to do to get the daily bumps is set > "reserve" to 99? Yep, It should work. Jean-Louis -

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread John R. Jackson
>It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must < 100 to >trust the dump in the holding disk. Are you saying all Denise has to do to get the daily bumps is set "reserve" to 99? >Jean-Louis John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 11, 2000, Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level >> incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it >> doesn't ``trust''

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level > incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it > doesn't ``trust'' incrementals in the holding disk. IMO, it should. > It depend of the

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 10, 2000, "John R. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ... To me it looks like Amanda did a >>> level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 >>> dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am. > The problem is that off line of discussions on this li

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread John R. Jackson
>> ... To me it looks like Amanda did a >> level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 >> dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am. > >Yes, exactly. Your AMANDA works fine, where is the problem? The problem is that off line of discussions on this list, I

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread Chris Karakas
Denise Ives wrote: > > Can anyone please explain to me what Amanda did here after the full dump > to tape daily118 on Tuesday 7 Nov 2000 ? To me it looks like Amanda did a > level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 > dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Frid

explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-10 Thread Denise Ives
Can anyone please explain to me what Amanda did here after the full dump to tape daily118 on Tuesday 7 Nov 2000 ? To me it looks like Amanda did a level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1 dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am. Bump level is set