On Tuesday 28 May 2019 11:09:43 pm Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 21:19:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Mine, when running 3.3.7p1 on wheezy, had this good header in every
> > vtape "header"
>
> Note that the "0.*" file is simply the table label written by
>
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 21:19:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Mine, when running 3.3.7p1 on wheezy, had this good header in every
> vtape "header"
Note that the "0.*" file is simply the table label written by
amlabel -- there is no "data" in it, the only point of the file is to
contain the
On Tuesday 28 May 2019 12:49:05 pm Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:40:33 -0400
>
> Gene Heskett wrote:
> > In my build on stretch the tape header, with normally contains
> > instructions for a gzip/tar only system, the recipe for bare
> > recovery has disappeared. It now looks
Agreed - the short form is: the tape header needs no instructions,
and each DLE file might be done with a different mechanism (true for me) so
each DLE backup has the instructions in the header.
Deb Baddorf
Fermilab
> On May 28, 2019, at 11:49 AM, Charles Curley
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28
On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:40:33 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> In my build on stretch the tape header, with normally contains
> instructions for a gzip/tar only system, the recipe for bare recovery
> has disappeared. It now looks like this:
> AMANDA: TAPESTART DATE 20190527162707 TAPE Dailys-1
>
>
In my build on stretch the tape header, with normally contains
instructions for a gzip/tar only system, the recipe for bare recovery
has disappeared. It now looks like this:
AMANDA: TAPESTART DATE 20190527162707 TAPE Dailys-1
There is supposed to be a 2nd line, showing how to unpack the
I am using 2.6.1p2-8.el6 on a CentOS 6.5 system. I am using virtual tapes
(chg-disk) as my backup device. I want to use 5G 'tapes' and a split size of
1G. But amanda is using a splitsize of 10meg. Why is it doing this?
Here is my amanda config file (*I* cannot find the error):
org Wendell
. But amanda is using a splitsize of 10meg. Why is it doing this?
Here is my amanda config file (*I* cannot find the error):
org Wendell Free Library # Organization name for reports
mailto hel...@deepsoft.com# Email address to receive reports
netusage 1 Kbps
on a CentOS 6.5 system. I am using virtual tapes
(chg-disk) as my backup device. I want to use 5G 'tapes' and a split size
of
1G. But amanda is using a splitsize of 10meg. Why is it doing this?
Here is my amanda config file (*I* cannot find the error):
org Wendell Free Library
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 kirjutas Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com:
Question: when using a disk-based 'virtual tape changer', is there is any
point in using a holding disk? I understand that a holding disk is a
good idea
when using real tapes, as this helps in keeping the tape drive streaming --
At Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:42:00 +0300 Toomas Aas toomas@raad.tartu.ee wrote:
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 kirjutas Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com:
Question: when using a disk-based 'virtual tape changer', is there is any
point in using a holding disk? I understand that a holding disk is a
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:13:51PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:42:00 +0300 Toomas Aas toomas@raad.tartu.ee
wrote:
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 kirjutas Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com:
Question: when using a disk-based 'virtual tape changer', is there is any
At Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:01:25 -0400 amanda-users@amanda.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:13:51PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
At Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:42:00 +0300 Toomas Aas toomas@raad.tartu.ee
wrote:
Mon, 09 Jun 2014 kirjutas Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:30:46PM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Wednesday, 12.03.2014 at 14:38 +, Dave Ewart wrote:
What's going on? Why am I not getting to use the full capacity??
Just to follow up on this one: I was able to purchase two, replacement
identical tape drives
On Wednesday, 12.03.2014 at 13:11 -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Don't know if its relevant, but I've got an LTO5/juke and it dropped
in both speed and capacity.
Interesting: was it a gradual decrease in performance or was there a
sudden drop?
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
da...@ceu.ox.ac.uk
Computing
brand) tapes - just like
http://img.misco.eu/Resources/images/Modules/InformationBlocks/1210/TAN/TAN-2/202175-tandberg-LTO-5-tape-cartridge-small.jpg
- and the second tapetype above was created using a previously-unused
tape and they really are 1.5TB native!
What's going on? Why am I not getting
using a previously-unused
tape and they really are 1.5TB native!
What's going on? Why am I not getting to use the full capacity??
A guess only.
I note the measured speed has dropped by 45%. Due to what I haven't a clue,
but maybe some hardware change or cables or ???
Perhaps your system's
On Wednesday, 12.03.2014 at 12:28 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
A guess only.
I note the measured speed has dropped by 45%. Due to what I haven't a
clue, but maybe some hardware change or cables or ???
Hmmm, yeah: I noticed that too, just after I'd posted. It's the same
controller card as
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:55:30PM +, Dave Ewart wrote:
On Wednesday, 12.03.2014 at 12:28 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
A guess only.
I note the measured speed has dropped by 45%. Due to what I haven't a
clue, but maybe some hardware change or cables or ???
Hmmm, yeah: I noticed
a previously-unused
tape and they really are 1.5TB native!
What's going on? Why am I not getting to use the full capacity??
A guess only.
I note the measured speed has dropped by 45%. Due to what I haven't a clue,
but maybe some hardware change or cables
using a previously-unused
tape and they really are 1.5TB native!
What's going on? Why am I not getting to use the full capacity??
A guess only.
I note the measured speed has dropped by 45%. Due to what I haven't a clue,
but maybe some hardware change or cables or ???
Perhaps
Hi,
I increased my vTape pool during the last days, but amanda is still only
writing to the old tapes that were already in use and not to the new ones.
If I change the tapelist entry from
0 KDD181 reuse
to an old date
210100 KDD181 reuse
the vTape is used in the next run.
I found a
group amanda-users@amanda.org
Betreff: Why does Amanda not use my new labled tapes?
Hi,
I increased my vTape pool during the last days, but amanda is still only
writing to the old tapes that were already in use and not to the new ones.
If I change the tapelist entry from
0 KDD181
Linux 6
(x86_64).
I don't know why it will not use the new tapes, maybe order in the tapelist?
However, as a workaround, if you increase the tapecycle parameter above
the number already used, amanda should go looking for a new tape.
Jon
--
Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com
JG
.
Amanda does a full backup of the /data on one day of the week and then
does level one backups for the rest of the week. It does a level one
backup of the other 6 disks on the day it does the full of /data, and
then does full backups of the other 6 disks on the other 6 days.
Why does
of the week and then
does level one backups for the rest of the week. It does a level one
backup of the other 6 disks on the day it does the full of /data, and
then does full backups of the other 6 disks on the other 6 days.
Why does Amanda make so many full backups? Is there a configuation
days.
Why does Amanda make so many full backups? Is there a configuation
parameter we need to set to change this?
Amanda tries to level out, or balance, the amount of data sent
to tape each day of the seven day dumpcycle. The mechanism it
has to achieve this balance is to bump a DLE
a level one
backup of the other 6 disks on the day it does the full of /data, and
then does full backups of the other 6 disks on the other 6 days.
Why does Amanda make so many full backups? Is there a configuation
parameter we need to set to change this?
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544
and then
does level one backups for the rest of the week. It does a level one
backup of the other 6 disks on the day it does the full of /data, and
then does full backups of the other 6 disks on the other 6 days.
Why does Amanda make so many full backups? Is there a configuation
parameter we need
Hello!
Amanda does a full backup of the /data on one day of the week and then
does level one backups for the rest of the week. It does a level one
backup of the other 6 disks on the day it does the full of /data, and
then does full backups of the other 6 disks on the other 6 days.
Why does
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
I picked a 'virtual' tape size to match the capacity of a DVD-R: 4.3Gig,
with the idea of migrating the fulls and the more major incrs to DVD-Rs
for long-term archival.
Ah! You should take a look at both the dvdrw device
At Sun, 3 Oct 2010 10:11:57 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
I picked a 'virtual' tape size to match the capacity of a DVD-R: 4.3Gig,
with the idea of migrating the fulls and the more major incrs to
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Also I am pretty much stuck with 2.5.0, since that is what comes with
CentOS... (I don't at this point want to 'experiment' with a bleeding
edge self-built package, not for something like this.)
Yikes, you may be *very*
At Sun, 3 Oct 2010 11:37:25 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com
wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
Also I am pretty much stuck with 2.5.0, since that is what comes with
CentOS... (I don't at this point want to 'experiment' with a
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
One of the downsides of using a very *stable* Linux distro with long
term stable support. OTOH, it avoids the fun of re-installing
everything every 6-12 months and then spending a couple of months
getting all of the
actually helped -- it helped me
understand what Amanda was upto and why it is doing what it does. From
another post I got the idea of have two configs (with a shared common
config), one for archival fulls (run manually, once a month) and one
for dailyincr (run from cron). The archival fulls use large
Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only
1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28
days). The documentation for the bump* parameters is not clear (to
me). I want Amanda to aggressively bump dump levels.
I don't have enough virtual tapes
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:05:44AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only
1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28
days). The documentation for the bump* parameters is not clear (to
me). I want Amanda
At Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:15:29 -0400 amanda-users@amanda.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:05:44AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
Why does Amanda do multiple level 0 backups? I only want 1 (and only
1) level 0 backup (of any given disk) in the backup cycle (4 weeks / 28
days
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
runtapes 2 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump
I hope very few dumps take more than one tape, like none :)
To be clear on the planner's reasoning: it considers itself to have
runtapes * tapetype:length kb
At Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:59:38 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
runtapes 2 # number of tapes to be used in a single run of amdump
I hope very few dumps take more than one tape, like none :)
To be clear
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
So I would be better off setting runtapes to 1? And then manually
'flushing' at the beginning of the cycle to deal with the larger fulls?
Arg...
This sort of thing is not really well explained in the man pages...
At Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:06:17 -0500 Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
So I would be better off setting runtapes to 1? Â And then manually
'flushing' at the beginning of the cycle to deal with the larger
Robert,
I had another thought. You could set all your DLEs to
be set to do incremental only. I forget whether this
is strategy nofull or strategy incronly or ???.
With this you may be able to set you runtapes to 1
and maybe use a larger tape size as you would not
be archiving them to DVDs. You
Hi,
I'm using amanda 2.6.1p2 and I'm wondering, why my vtapes are allways filled
up to 100%, while LTO3 tapes are not:
vtapes:
LabelTime Size %NbNc
KDD103 2:5366457M 100.084 101
KDD104 1:0066459M 100.01535
KDD105 2:06
Am 05.07.2010 08:51, schrieb Christ Schlacta:
first thing I see is that your LTO3 drives are SIGNIFICANTLY larger than your
vdisks.
That's true. But in which way this results in not filling up to 100%?
--
Marc Muehlfeld
Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsmedizin Dr. Klein und Dr.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Marc Muehlfeld
marc.muehlf...@medizinische-genetik.de wrote:
I'm using amanda 2.6.1p2 and I'm wondering, why my vtapes are allways filled
up to 100%, while LTO3 tapes are not:
vtapes size themselves to precisely LENGTH bytes, whereas tape
capacity can vary based
Running Amanda-2.6.1-p2 On Solaris 10 X86
Why is this considered an error?
I check the error status of my amdump and base on the error status after it
finishes I take certain actions.
Is there some way that I can distinguish this error from a real amdump error?
These dumps were to tapes
McGraw, Robert P wrote:
Running Amanda-2.6.1-p2 On Solaris 10 X86
Why is this considered an error?
No reason, already fixed it in 3.1, it is not an error.
Jean-Louis
I check the error status of my amdump and base on the error status after it
finishes I take certain actions
20100408011908_1.gz
So the indices are there. Why can't amrecover find them?
--
Cheers, Gene
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Except for 75% of the women, everyone in the whole world wants
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
500 No dumps available on or before date 2010-04-08
Actually, this means there are no catalog entries for that date. I
think I had asked last time, what amadmin Conf find will show for that
particular DLE?
Dustin
On Thursday 22 April 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
500 No dumps available on or before date 2010-04-08
Actually, this means there are no catalog entries for that date. I
think I had asked last time, what amadmin
--- 1 amanda disk81455 2010-04-07 02:36 20100407011911_1.gz
-rw--- 1 amanda disk 525945 2010-04-08 16:42 20100408011908_1
-rw--- 1 amanda disk81455 2010-04-08 02:27 20100408011908_1.gz
So the indices are there. Why can't amrecover find them?
On Thursday 22 April 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
500 No dumps available on or before date 2010-04-08
Actually, this means there are no catalog entries for that date. I
think I had asked last time, what amadmin
You lost all log files, They should in the `amgetconf Daily
logdir`/oldlog directory, moved them to
`amgetconf test logdir`.
Jean-Louis
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 22 April 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
On Thursday 22 April 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net
wrote:
500 No dumps available on or before date 2010-04-08
Actually, this means there are no catalog entries for that date. I
think I had asked last time, what amadmin
On Thursday 22 April 2010, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Gene,
Do the tapelist is correct?
Tapelist was the culprit, see previous next msg from me, that test recovery
was done without incident this time, pulling 4 dirs in /usr/share that might
be why it won't boot.
Thanks Dustin.
--
Cheers
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
It's important to do the dump direct to tape at the end if you have a
small holding disk, Amanda was designed for this case.
But hard disk are now cheap, what you propose is a good idea.
Patch is welcome.
Maybe we should show this to the hackers-list ?
S
Dustin J. Mitchell schrieb:
However, the driver always schedules its PORT_WRITE (direct to tape)
dumps *after* its holding-based runs. The idea is that dumping
directly to tape basically monopolizes the entire server
infrastructure, so it's better to get the cooperating dumps out of the
way
It's important to do the dump direct to tape at the end if you have a
small holding disk, Amanda was designed for this case.
But hard disk are now cheap, what you propose is a good idea.
Patch is welcome.
Jean-Louis
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell schrieb:
However, the
OK, I'll take a swing at this :)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger s...@amanda.org wrote:
I want to avoid to copy ~60 GB from disk to holdingdisk internally at
every amdump, so I decided to set them to holdingdisk no -- write the
to tape directly.
taperalgo first, btw
The
At a client I have two DLEs which are local directories on the amanda
tapeserver. There is new data dumped there every day during the day.
I want to avoid to copy ~60 GB from disk to holdingdisk internally at
every amdump, so I decided to set them to holdingdisk no -- write the
to tape directly.
issue sorted. thanks everyone. i had to sort out /etc/sysconfig/iptables!
a clue:
dumper: stream_client: connect to 192.168.0.60.46830 failed: No route
to host
why is the server trying to dump to the client?
please help!
Zanga.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 08:55:57AM +0200, Zanga Chimombo wrote:
rant
i have a problem with setting up amanda but more of that later. i have
the following configurations:
AMANDA_DBGDIR=/var/log/amanda
CONFIG_DIR=/etc/amanda
i have been looking in /var/log/amanda for clues to my problem to
On 2008-07-11 08:55, Zanga Chimombo wrote:
rant
i have a problem with setting up amanda but more of that later. i have
the following configurations:
AMANDA_DBGDIR=/var/log/amanda
CONFIG_DIR=/etc/amanda
i have been looking in /var/log/amanda for clues to my problem to no
avail. i have only
: stream_client: connect to 192.168.0.60.46830 failed: No route
to host
why is the server trying to dump to the client?
The dumper just tries to connect to the client GET the dump.
Does simple networking between the client and host work?
Depending on which version of amanda you use and which
i should've said that my rant is against the documentation not the
design rationale.
They may have a substring in the name having the letters log, but
during the history of amanda, they are used for much more then
the initial purpose of logging only.
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Log_Files
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Zanga Chimombo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the following line in amdump.X seems to give a clue:
dumper: stream_client: connect to 192.168.0.60.46830 failed: No route to
host
why is the server trying to dump to the client?
Since Jon and Paul have addressed
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Zanga Chimombo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i should've said that my rant is against the documentation not the design
rationale.
..it *is* on a wiki, nudge nudge.
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
Thanks Dustin,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Dustin J. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Donald Murray, P.Eng.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Around line 432 it's finished checking the last dump it checks, then
it starts the first dump from godel. I've
Hey,
I've been using amanda for years now to backup linux boxes on
my home network. Data is written to vtapes on a 3ware RAID-1.
I recently upgraded the OS on one of the amanda clients, which
might be related to what I'm seeing here.
The problem: I just noticed that amverifyrun is not verifying
Try running amverify directly, using 'sh -x' to give debugging
information. amverify basically runs amrecover under the hood, and
there may be some error that is causing amrecover to not pick up where
it left off after file 12. Alternately, there may be some problem
with the doonefile shell
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Donald Murray, P.Eng.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Around line 432 it's finished checking the last dump it checks, then
it starts the first dump from godel. I've included that section below:
...
++ grep 'reached end of information'
if they are possible
or not?
1) Why amanda creates incremental dumps to holding disk?
Amanda is supposed to redirect the dumps to a holding disk in the follow
case:
- No tape drive.
- The cable became disconnected.
Why amanda doesn't fail backup and creates incremental dumps to holding
disk?
2) Do
to my questions follow whether if they are
possible or not?
1) Why amanda creates incremental dumps to holding disk?
Amanda is supposed to redirect the dumps to a holding disk in the
follow case:
- No tape drive.
- The cable became disconnected.
or the wrong tape in the drive
-get.')
--/var/spool/cron/crontabs Empty
--/var/amanda/* (All my amanda database information is missing.)
One common thread is that all of these directories are in /var/.
However, other files in this branch, such as /var/lib/apt/lists/* seem
to be restored just fine.
I don't understand why
Zembower, Kevin wrote:
I thought that after all this, I'd be done. However, I'm discovering
pockets of files and directories that seem to have never made it to the
backup tapes in the first place. Some examples:
--/service/tinydns, dnscache, qmail-send, ... All these were soft links
to the
don't understand why these files and directories are missing. My
disklist includes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/amanda/DBackup$ grep -i center disklist
centernet sda2 tar #/
centernet sda14 tar #/boot
centernet sda3 tar #/usr
centernet sda5 tar #/opt/analog/logdata
centernet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:20 PM
To: Zembower, Kevin
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Why didn't my backup work (the way I thought it should)?
Did you have an exclude list?
Were any of those directories symlinks to other filesystems or NFS
mounts
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Zembower, Kevin wrote:
Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe,
GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and
I'm using GNUtar:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib$ tar --version
tar (GNU tar) 1.14
Likely
infrequently. I'll have to check into this, too.
Thanks, again.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Frank Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 1:20 PM
To: Zembower, Kevin
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Why didn't my backup work (the way I thought it should
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:02, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Zembower, Kevin wrote:
Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe,
GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and
I'm using GNUtar:
[EMAIL
Hi! I have one doubt. Amanda use gnu-tar to backup subdirectories and
amanda can access to all files and directories in disklist file not
being the owner. But gnu-tar hasn't suid bit activated then, How can
amanda access them? which internal mechanism use amanda?
/usr/lib/amanda/runtar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 22/08/2006
10:28:03 :
Hi! I have one doubt. Amanda use gnu-tar to backup subdirectories
and
amanda can access to all files and directories in disklist file not
being the owner. But gnu-tar hasn't suid bit activated then, How
can
On 2006-08-22 10:28, Natalia García Nebot wrote:
Hi! I have one doubt. Amanda use gnu-tar to backup subdirectories and
amanda can access to all files and directories in disklist file not
being the owner. But gnu-tar hasn't suid bit activated then, How can
amanda access them? which internal
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, [ISO-8859-1] Natalia Garc�a Nebot wrote:
Hi! I have one doubt. Amanda use gnu-tar to backup subdirectories and amanda
can access to all files and directories in disklist file not being the owner.
But gnu-tar hasn't suid bit activated then, How can amanda access them?
No idea.
Maybe someone on the list knows better what
this wrapper can do?
Natalia García Nebot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a écrit sur 22/08/2006 11:01:21 :
and is this behavior safe? it wil not produce security holes?
Cyrille Bollu escribió:
exactly
Natalia García Nebot [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
Title: Attempt to contact amanda gives sshd error -- dont know why sshd is involved!
An amanda client that used to work on a debian host, before
an apt-get update and an apt-get upgrade, and an installation
of opennms (which installed the silly daemon identd for postgres)
now gives me
Lengyel, Florian schrieb:
An amanda client that used ...
Please don't hijack threads ...
Thank you, Stefan.
Title: RE: Attempt to contact amanda gives sshd error -- dont know why sshd is involved!
I have no idea what this means. I started a new thread in good faith.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Stefan G. Weichinger
Sent: Thu 3/30/2006 2:12 PM
To: amanda-users
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:34:02PM -0500, Lengyel, Florian wrote:
I have no idea what this means. I started a new thread in good faith.
You did not start a new thread. You replied to an unrelated message and
simply changed the Subject: header, thereby hijacking the thread.
Starting a new
Lengyel, Florian wrote:
An amanda client that used to work on a debian host, before
an apt-get update and an apt-get upgrade, and an installation
of opennms (which installed the silly daemon identd for postgres)
now gives me timeouts when I try
Hi,
What version of Amanda are you using? ssh
--On March 30, 2006 1:01:29 PM -0800 Kevin Till [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
the Did not receive identification string from:::10.10.32.247
should not have anything to do with Amanda. Seems to me someone try to
login as amanda to that machine.
It doesn't. This actually happens when
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mike Delaney
Sent: Thu 3/30/2006 3:53 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Attempt to contact amanda gives sshd error -- dont know why sshd
is involved!
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:34:02PM -0500, Lengyel, Florian wrote:
I have no idea what
when I try
Hi,
What version of Amanda are you using? ssh support was added to Amanda 2.5.0.
?ssh support? is it optional/default/??? What parts might use it?
I wonder why Florian would be hitting it (i.e. even using any aspect of ssh)
by simply upgrading an existing amanda
it.
I wonder why Florian would be hitting it (i.e. even using any aspect of ssh)
by simply upgrading an existing amanda installation?
please see other posts on this thread.
--
Thank you!
Kevin Till
Amanda documentation: http://wiki.zmanda.com
Amanda forums:http://forums.zmanda.com
Hi,
I had no idea that this way of composing a new thread, by moving the cc: =
address
amanda-users@amanda.org to the to: address amanda-users@amanda.org would =
constitute=20
hijacking. It is mistaken wrong to suggest that this was in any way =
intentional.
This is not bad per se, I do
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:51:34AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
What was your version?
2.4.5
If you upgraded from 2.4.4p2 or earlier to a 2.4.5 then could you try
the untested attached patch.
The patch seems to help. Thanks! Is this a new problem or is it already
fixed in CVS?
Hello!
Since I have re-installed amanda, I get no more incrementals when it runs
into degraded mode. From the logfiles I can't find any hint why it always
does full-backups. All DLEs are affected by this problem. But in the
description below, I list only one DLE.
Here is what amadmin info
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
