Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it doesn't ``trust'' incrementals in the holding disk. IMO, it should. It depend of the

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 11, 2000, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it doesn't ``trust''

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread John R. Jackson
It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must 100 to trust the dump in the holding disk. Are you saying all Denise has to do to get the daily bumps is set "reserve" to 99? Jean-Louis John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: explanation of the following dump reports -

2000-11-11 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:50:59AM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must 100 to trust the dump in the holding disk. Are you saying all Denise has to do to get the daily bumps is set "reserve" to 99? Yep, It should work. Jean-Louis --