.amandahosts and root access

2001-01-20 Thread Artur Kedzierski
I am trying to backup /etc directory on a remote machine. I used the .amandahosts file to connect to that machine. It works when I connect as a regular user, (i.e. 'amanda') but it wouldn't allow me to log in as root. How can I log in as root?

Re: .amandahosts and root access

2001-01-20 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Artur Kedzierski wrote: I am trying to backup /etc directory on a remote machine. I used the .amandahosts file to connect to that machine. It works when I connect as a regular user, (i.e. 'amanda') but it wouldn't allow me to log in as root. How can I log

Re: .amandahosts and root access

2001-01-20 Thread Artur Kedzierski
Some files in /etc (example: shadow) are only readable by root. How can I back up those files if amanda doesn't allow root login? On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Artur Kedzierski wrote: I am trying to backup /etc directory on a remote

110%?

2001-01-20 Thread Ben Elliston
amstatus says that one of my partitions has been dumped to 110%. Then it just sits there, never writing the dump to tape (there are no tapers running). scooby:sda5 0 127811k dumping 141056k (110.36%) What's up with this? I'm running CVS Amanda on the tape server now.

Re: 110%?

2001-01-20 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Ben Elliston wrote: amstatus says that one of my partitions has been dumped to 110%. Then it just sits there, never writing the dump to tape (there are no tapers running). scooby:sda5 0 127811k dumping 141056k (110.36%) What's up with this? I'm

Re: 110%?

2001-01-20 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 10:54:05AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: amstatus says that one of my partitions has been dumped to 110%. Then it just sits there, never writing the dump to tape (there are no tapers running). scooby:sda5 0 127811k dumping 141056k (110.36%) What's

Re: 110%?

2001-01-20 Thread Ben Elliston
It means the estimate (127811k) was wrong and the filesystem is larger than the estimate. It must be dumping something, look for process activity on your client and server. There are five concurrent dump processes running for /dev/sda5: 404 ?S 0:00 dump 0usf 1048576 -

Re: 110%?

2001-01-20 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Ben Elliston wrote: Processes 408 and 410 *are* in read/write calls, but they're not doing much. Is something wedged, and if so, why? Are you using compression? If so gzip could well be the bottleneck rather than dump. Look for gzip processes, too. To decide if

Re: 110%?

2001-01-20 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:36:12AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: Processes 408 and 410 *are* in read/write calls, but they're not doing much. Is something wedged, and if so, why? What's the dumper is doing on the server? Do you have free space on your holding disk? Are you sure you are running

Re: Amanda and Exabyte (Sorry)

2001-01-20 Thread Chris Marble
Tanniel Simonian wrote: Currently, I am running Amanda 2.4.2, with the Exabyte Mammoth 2 EZ17 loader, on a Dell Poweredge 2300, etc.. My exact configuration is as follows. In my amanda.conf file i have: snip tpchanger "/usr/amanda/libexec/chg-zd-mtx" tapedev "/dev/nst0" changerdev