. (And obviously, in the case of changed device numbers
> for the filesystem, the check is actually harmful).
>
> I don't know about changing the actual default in the amgtar
> application itself at this point in time, but perhaps it at least
> makes sense to recommend disabling check-devic
Sorry, but below replace "sticky bit" by "suid bit".
Charles
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 21:10:36 +0100
From: Charles Stroom
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: amanda backup fails, because of wrong suid settings
Hi all,
This is on Linux Opensuse 42
reason why all of a sudden there are these problems?
Many thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the "no-spam.")
ot;my_amdump" etc with the
commands, but this has not my preference.
Thanks, Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the "no-spam.")
es after
an amdump on vfat , I noticed no time changes at all. So noatime
on vfat would probably not have solved the problems.
The ntfs disk is mounted as:
/dev/sdc1 /home/charles/pictures ntfs-3g \
defaults,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=0022,nofail,noatime,rw 0 0
Cheers, Charles
18:43:30 +0100
From: Charles Stroom <char...@stremen.xs4all.nl>
To: Jean-Louis Martineau <jmartin...@carbonite.com>
Subject: Re: again level 1 backup problems.
Hi Jean-Louis,
before your email arrived, I was testing something different.
I copied the whole ~/pictures tree back
n
where or how to look for solutions are welcome. As far as I can see,
the new disklist and amanda.conf do not differ in essence from the
previous instalment when they were part of a single backup setup which
worked flawless (but with ~/pictures on a different linux formatted
disk). Strange.
Charles
Thanks, and indeed my investigations into possible a/m/ctime problems
were a red herring. Something learned.
Regards, Charles
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:48:03 -0500
Nathan Stratton Treadway natha...@ontko.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:53:07 +0100, Charles Stroom wrote:
I than repeated
Stratton Treadway natha...@ontko.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 21:57:59 +0100, Charles Stroom wrote:
behaved as it should. Strange that in fact the encryption seems to
make the difference, not the LVM/Raid. I had seen this remark on
device numbers before, but my knowledge is too limited
did a reboot
in between.
But I still keep my fingers crossed.
Regards, Charles
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:13:32 +0100
Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
and this evening the first scheduled backup and it failed miserably
with exactly the same symptoms as before: all level 1 DLEs
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:13:32 +0100
Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
and this evening the first scheduled backup and it failed miserably
with exactly the same symptoms as before: all level 1 DLEs are equal
in size to a level 0, with the exception of only 2 DLEs (and heaven
Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
As said, I changed to tar 1.27 and now the problem has disappeared. I
cleaned all what was necessary and started with a full backup on all
DLEs. There was some strange tar message on the single dle at the
external client stremen (... /usr/local/bin
, or do I
need to recompile?
Regards, Charles with many thanks for the pointers received.
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
, 25 Feb 2014 09:50:00 -0500
Jean-Louis Martineau martin...@zmanda.com wrote:
Charles,
Can you post the output of the 'stat' command of one of the file
before the level 1 backup and after the the level 1 backup, to see
what changed.
Jean-Louis
On 02/25/2014 04:53 AM, Charles Stroom wrote
, 25 Feb 2014 17:48:13 +0100
Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
Jean-Louis,
It's getting complicated, because in my previous post below I reported
that with option --atime-preserve=system a level 1 tar incremental
worked. However, some time later it didn't work any more, so
(609) 477-8330 (C)
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
:28AM +0100, Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi all,
on 20 Feb, I have been running my first backup after cleanup the
test results (amanda 3.3.5 compiled on opensuse 13.1). As
expected, the 13 DLEs were all level 0, exceeded the capacity of my
DDS4 backup tape and I needed 2 flushes to get it all
before the level 0 backup. As
long as tar is given the incremental list correctly by Amanda,
something in the stats of the file must have changed (other than
access time and device number if --no-check-device flag was given by
Amanda).
Paul
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles
have never had
these problems with 3.3.1 in opensuse 11.4 (my previous version).
Any advice appreciated and of course I can provide more details/logs.
Regards, Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
, but will send another post
on that.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:58:56 -0500
Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:39:33AM +0100, Charles Stroom wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:00:01 -0500
Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
...
You said that an include implies
Client check: 2 hosts checked in 2.389 seconds. 0 problems found.
(brought to you by Amanda 3.3.5)
Odd, whatever it means.
Regards, Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
: no, apparently include - exclude is the right order,
looking at examples so far. Trying to find confirmation, pointed
to the points above. Thanks.
Regards, Charles
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:29:03 +0100
Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
I am now running my compiled 3.3.5 amanda on opensuse 13.1
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:00:01 -0500
Jon LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:29:03PM +0100, Charles Stroom wrote:
I am now running my compiled 3.3.5 amanda on opensuse 13.1 and have
reformatted my disklist. I have difficulties to understand what
will be, or what
backups have FAILED. Shouldn't the classification
be more similar to something like the STRANGE errors (where files
have changed during backup, for example)?
Cheers,
Alan
On 12/10/2012 06:05 PM, Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi, the forwarded email below was meant to go to the list, but I
noticed
to investigate my
estimate timeouts then...
Cheers,
Alan
On 12/11/2012 12:56 PM, Charles Stroom wrote:
The planner has an ERROR to make the estimate, but than later the
dump itself FAILs as well. So no backup is made of that particular
DLE.
Regards, Charles
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012
Hi, the forwarded email below was meant to go to the list, but I noticed
later it was only to 1 recepient. Hence the forward.
Regards, Charles
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 22:08:48 +0100
From: Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl
To: Jens Berg jens.b...@vtecheurope.com
424430 223784 52.71:25
2646.1 1:37 2307.1
(brought to you by Amanda version 3.2.2)
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
would be appreciated.
Regards, Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
Greetings,
I recently upgraded to openSUSE 11.4 and wanted to upgrade my amanda
2.6 to 3.2.2. As there is no rpm available for 11.4, I am trying the
same route which was succesful 2 years ago:
-download the src.rpm package
-rpm -i amanda*.src.rpm
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:47:58 -0600
Dan Locks dwlo...@zmanda.com wrote:
Charles Stroom wrote:
Firstly, I removed the 2 redundant lines in my patch - compile and
build seems still to be ok.
Then, I changed the distver line to 11.1 - now the error re-occurs:
cont...@fiume:~/done/RPMs
machine.
thanks
Paddy
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Charles Stroom
char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
Will a source in RPM amanda-2.6.1.noarch.src.rpm become available
as it was for 2.6.0.p2?
Regards,
Charles
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:58:01 -0500
Jean-Louis Martineau
, which is already set
on line 111 and dist, which is already set on 109), and set distver to
11 instead of 11.1.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Charles Stroom
char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
error: /usr/src/packages/SPECS/amanda.spec:363:
parseExpressionBoolean
363 %if %{disttag
Will a source in RPM amanda-2.6.1.noarch.src.rpm become available as
it was for 2.6.0.p2?
Regards,
Charles
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:58:01 -0500
Jean-Louis Martineau martin...@zmanda.com wrote:
Hello,
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.6.1. Thanks to
Hi,
I am using amanda with DDS tapes without h/w compression and during
boot the compression is disabled using mt. I noticed however a
different behaviour between the mt in the cpio 2.6 package (in opensuse
10.2) and the version 2.9 which is in opensuse 11.1.
The command is mt -f [dev]
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:57:45 -0500
Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Charles Stroom
char...@stremen.xs4all.nl wrote:
If you don't mind continuing to work on this, I can point you toward
the problem line. The part that begins with
34 # Define
Looking at this, am I missing my version 11.1, as my suse_macros
include a line
%suse_version 1110
which is not in the snippet?
Regards,
Charles
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:07:42 -0500
Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Ingo Schaefer
, den 16.01.2009, 14:00 +0100 schrieb Charles Stroom:
so I'm guessing that _vendor isn't defined.
No, that is not the point.
_vendor is defined, but none of the three cases is the right one, so
dist will not be defined.
Basically, all I need is for someone or a group (hi, Charles
Hi all,
Julian's email reminded me to check the Build Service archive, and there
I found amanda-2.6.0.2-2.1.src.rpm, apparently for o-suse 11.1. I
decided to do a rmpbuild on that file, and it worked until the end and
created 3 rpm's:
- amanda-2.6.0.2-2.1.i586.rpm
-
I was too hasty but I have also little experience. Anyhow, I followed
Ingo's list of required packages and installed all the missing ones.
However that did not seemed to be the problem (yet). There is something
with pkgconfig not in order, but pkgconfig is installed. The build, as
root:
fiume:
Hi all,
I did not see my message below coming back on the list, so apologies if
this is now received twice.
Charles
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:07:12 +0100
From: Charles Stroom char...@stremen.xs4all.nl
To: Dustin J. Mitchell dus...@zmanda.com
Cc: Ingo Schaefer i
://www.nmcourts.gov
mailto: mario.si...@nmcourts.gov
Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi,
Is there somewhere an RPM version of amanda 2.6.0 for openSuse 11.1?
I have been using amanda-backup_server-2.6.0-1.suse10.i586.rpm under
10.2, but have now upgraded to 11.1 (because 10.2 is no longer
Hi,
Is there somewhere an RPM version of amanda 2.6.0 for openSuse 11.1?
I have been using amanda-backup_server-2.6.0-1.suse10.i586.rpm under
10.2, but have now upgraded to 11.1 (because 10.2 is no longer
maintained). However, I cannot find any RPM for 11.1, apart from 2.5.2,
which is in the
Hi all,
has anyone tried to have an amanda client running on an ASUS eeePC?
Regards,
Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
, 14 Apr 2008 19:30:27 -0400
Dustin J. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Charles Stroom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dustin, thanks for the analysis and is seems to make sense because
indeed in the /etc/services only 703 and 708 are unassigned in
between 700-710
:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Charles Stroom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks for the offer. I will send you the last 3 days to your
email address.
OK, the 172.0.0.2 stuff is definitely weird, but doesn't seem to be
causing the problem. Here's what I found
was successfully retried
Thanks for looking.
Charles
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:18:10 -0400
Dustin J. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Charles Stroom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FAILURE DUMP SUMMARY:
fiume.localnet /home/charles/pictures lev 1 FAILED [cannot read
for the last
two or three runs, with an indication of which dumps failed? I'll see
what I can find.
Dustin
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
On 8 April I did send out an email to the amanda-users list. But I have
not received ANY message from the list since then, which is unusual.
Is the list working?
Regards,
Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
:005.7 0:00 119.2
stremen.loca /var1 394509149 23.20:19 481.3 0:09 1029.2
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.6.0)
:
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
the list of files to be
backed up).
fiume is a client PC, the 2 other DLE's on fiume do not give errors.
Is this something to worry about, or can I ignore this?
Regards,
Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:18:37 -0500
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Charles Stroom wrote:
Greeting,
since a number of days Amanda reports:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
fiume.localnet / lev 0 STRANGE
The details given
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:11:35 +0100
Marc Muehlfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles Stroom schrieb:
fiume:~ # amrecover -s fiume
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.2p1. Contacting server on fiume ...
[request failed: timeout waiting for ACK]
Run amcheck and have a look for errors.
fiume:/tmp
'-oauth=bsdtcp' as argument to amrecover.
Jean-Louis
Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi all,
today I tried to restore a couple of files, but amrecover failed to
connect to the index server (I believe). This is on my server PC
fiume:
fiume:~ # amrecover -s fiume
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.2p1
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:53:20 +0100
Charles Stroom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:11:35 +0100
Marc Muehlfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must a user root added somewhere? [in the xinet.d files]
No. Amanda runs as user. You configured amandabackup:disk
very logical indeed and moreover it works. One more little
mystery out of the way.
Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
help is appreciated.
Regards,
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
and the data is compressed on the client, then this
produces a high load and makes everything slow, too.
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
in the conf file?
Just questions, nothing really important, but they do intrigue me.
Thanks for any clue.
Charles
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
amanda.conf
Description: Binary data
= stream
protocol= tcp
wait= no
server_args = -auth=bsdtcp amdump amindexd
amidxtaped
Jean-Louis
Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hi,
Charles Stroom schrieb:
amcheck reports no problem.
amcheck doesn't use the full source
another port is used, but is this TCP or UDP?
Can somebody tell me what I have to tell the firewall (on opensuse 10.2), so
that it all works?
Regards,
--
Charles Stroom
email: charles at no-spam.stremen.xs4all.nl (remove the no-spam.)
that. Other replies relied on
recompiling amanda and if possible I would like to avoid that.
Regards,
Charles
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:15:56 +0200
Charles Stroom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
my server (fiume) and my client (stremen) both have a firewall and the
client fails to be backed up
Just to let everyone know that since the installation of 2.5.1p1
on 29 Sept, all problems as mentioned below, have vanished.
Well done and many thanks for Amanda!
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
--- Forwarded Message
Subject: ambackup fails for client
From
on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:39:36 EDT
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:24:39PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote:
In the above output, that means that you did not
run any amdump on the 4th day of the dumpcycle,
and expects that the next cycle will be the same
on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:33:15 EDT
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 05:56, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
But be careful, at least the tar 1.15.91-2 from Debian is broken: it
ignores the --one-file-system option
?
This is amanda 2.5.1.
Regards,
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:13:16 +0200
Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-09-19 12:34, Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi list,
when I do amadmin daily balance, the result is:
due-date #fsorig KB out KB balance
--
9/19 Tue
on Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:21:49 +0700
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
recently I have added 1 PC to be backuped up (so now in total 2 PC's
are backuped: the server itself and this 2nd PC). It has taken some
fiddling with the /etc/hosts file on the new client, but at the end
it
and today, everything went perfect! I don't understand.
Both PCs are switched off over night and are rebooted every day,
no change. Still it does work now and it did not over the last
2 days. I suspect it has something to do with name resolution.
Charles
--- Original Message
on Fri,
is appreciated, as usual.
Regards,
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
ignored the problem as the dumps
started to run smoothly. I am rather new to Amanda.
Can anybody shed some light? This is an RPM installation of Amanda
version 2.5.1b1 on SuSE 10.0, currently a single PC as client-server.
Regards,
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
corrente.localnet._usr_local.1
corrente.localnet._local.1 corrente.localnet._var.1
corrente.localnet._opt.1
Regards,
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
--- Original Message
on Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:29:57 EDT
Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:32:29 EDT
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:15:21PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote:
Hi all,
I have recently installed Amanda version 2.5.1b1 on my SuSE 10.0 PC,
via an binary rpm. After some struggling, I start to understand
how
Charles Stroom
email: charles at stremen dot xs4all dot nl
--- Original Message
on Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:33:08 EDT
Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 05:38, Charles Stroom wrote:
on Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:32:29 EDT
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi all,
I have recently installed Amanda version 2.5.1b1 on my SuSE 10.0 PC,
via an binary rpm. After some struggling, I start to understand
how it works and backups are being made.
However my daily reporting, in particular the last page the DUMP
SUMMARY is totally wrong. Below is that page of
74 matches
Mail list logo
