On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level
incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it
doesn't ``trust'' incrementals in the holding disk. IMO, it should.
It depend of the
On Nov 11, 2000, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 05:25:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
IIRC, some people have reported that it won't bump to higher-level
incrementals before the lower-level ones make it to tape. I.e., it
doesn't ``trust''
It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must 100 to
trust the dump in the holding disk.
Are you saying all Denise has to do to get the daily bumps is set
"reserve" to 99?
Jean-Louis
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:50:59AM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
It depend of the `reserve' parameter in 2.4.1p1, it must 100 to
trust the dump in the holding disk.
Are you saying all Denise has to do to get the daily bumps is set
"reserve" to 99?
Yep, It should work.
Jean-Louis
--
Denise Ives wrote:
Can anyone please explain to me what Amanda did here after the full dump
to tape daily118 on Tuesday 7 Nov 2000 ? To me it looks like Amanda did a
level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1
dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday
... To me it looks like Amanda did a
level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1
dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am.
Yes, exactly. Your AMANDA works fine, where is the problem?
The problem is that off line of discussions on this list, I
On Nov 10, 2000, "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... To me it looks like Amanda did a
level 1 dump on Wednesday am to the holding disk, then another level 1
dump on Thursday am, then another level 1 on Friday am.
The problem is that off line of discussions on this list, I
