Re: Getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX 10.15

2023-06-09 Thread Hauke Fath
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT), Robert Heller wrote: > I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux machine? We use Time Machine at work to back up Macs to a Samba share, so yes. It is user-operable, and you can restore from the rescue system for desaster recovery.

Re: Getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX 10.15

2023-06-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 6/9/23 00:51, Hauke Fath wrote: On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT), Robert Heller wrote: I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux machine? We use Time Machine at work to back up Macs to a Samba share, so yes. It is user-operable, and you can restore from the

Re: Getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX 10.15

2023-06-09 Thread Charles Curley
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:31:50 -0600 Charles Curley wrote: > However, if you encrypt the backup, the files on the Linux machine are > opaque, meaning you can't extract a file on the Linux machine. I have > not experimented with an unencrypted backup. Or maybe not. Take a look at the Debian package

Re: Getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX 10.15

2023-06-09 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:31:50 -0600 Charles Curley wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 20:57:38 -0400 (EDT) > Robert Heller wrote: > > > I know nothing about "Time Machine". Will it backup to a Linux > > machine? > > Yes. You need Apple networking so the Linux machine will fake a Mac. On >

Re: Getting Amanda (3.5.1) to run properly under MacOSX 10.15

2023-06-09 Thread Deb Baddorf
Time Machine is built into current Mac OSes. It wants its own disk, which should be a bit (or a lot) bigger than the one you are backing up. I don’t think it can backup to another machine. It works well, since it’s baked in. Deb > On Jun 8, 2023, at 10:36 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > I know