Jay wrote:
> Hello, all:
> I've been running Amavis-new for several months, without any problem.
> This afternoon, I had a power failure, and since restarting everything,
> I've been getting nothing but:
> 19:30:23.77: Recorded error -- Temporary error from SMTP partner:
> smtp;451 4.5.0 Err
Hello, all:
I've been running Amavis-new for several months, without any problem.
This afternoon, I had a power failure, and since restarting everything,
I've been getting nothing but:
19:30:23.77: Recorded error -- Temporary error from SMTP partner:
smtp;451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=0
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:24:41AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Joel,
>
> > Ok, I will adjust my configuration. But according to the new-docs,
> > checks may be performed (forced) when there are multiple recipients and
> > one recipient has checks and the other doesn't. In this case I'm
> > se
Joel,
> Ok, I will adjust my configuration. But according to the new-docs,
> checks may be performed (forced) when there are multiple recipients and
> one recipient has checks and the other doesn't. In this case I'm
> sending to one recipient, who has BypassBannedChecks=TRUE set in LDAP.
> Why i
Joel,
> # mail locally submitted on the host on which MTA runs
> $policy_bank{'INT-HOST'} = {
> bypass_spam_checks_maps => [ 1 ],
> bypass_banned_checks_maps => [ 1 ],
> };
>
> Shouldn't this be the following to guarantee that the email is delivered?
>
> # mail locally submitted on the host
In case you have not heard:
Major rift over Cisco security flaws at a security conference:
http://news.google.com/news?q=%22black+hat%22+iss+cisco&num=50&hl=en&lr=lang_en&safe=off&sa=N&tab=nn&oi=newsr
They are calling it cisco-gate
Gary V
---
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 21:44, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> tor, 28.07.2005 kl. 20.24 skrev Matthew D. Sill:
>
> > This is sort of off topic, however, I thought that since people are on
> > this list to fight spam, that others could benefit. I am running dual
> > sendmail + amavis on two machines, and
tor, 28.07.2005 kl. 20.24 skrev Matthew D. Sill:
> This is sort of off topic, however, I thought that since people are on
> this list to fight spam, that others could benefit. I am running dual
> sendmail + amavis on two machines, and my job, like yours I assume, is
> to keep spam out of our c
--- Gary V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> You are not required to configure an extra policy
> bank to get amavisd to run.
> All the policy bank samples are commented out in
> amavisd.conf. They
> can remain this way, and you should be able to start
> amavisd up
> without configuring them. Take
Jonathan wrote:
> Hi all,
> i have the following setup in my amavis conf file:
> $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
> $spam_admin = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> $sa_local_tests_only = 0;
> $sa_auto_whitelist = 1;
> $sa_timeout = 30;
> $sa_mail_body_size_limit = 150*1024;
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = -.9
This is sort of off topic, however, I thought that since people are on
this list to fight spam, that others could benefit. I am running dual
sendmail + amavis on two machines, and my job, like yours I assume, is
to keep spam out of our client's mailboxes.
Two days ago I started recieving a
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Joel,
>
>
>>Yes, I have $banned_namepath_re defined and $banned_filename_re=undef.
>>Am I missing something here? Do I need to use the new
>>$banned_filename_re instead of $banned_namepath_re when doing per
>>recipient banned checks? I want one definition for banned chec
Hi all,
i have the following setup in my amavis conf file:
$final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
$spam_admin = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
$sa_local_tests_only = 0;
$sa_auto_whitelist = 1;
$sa_timeout = 30;
$sa_mail_body_size_limit = 150*1024;
$sa_tag_level_deflt = -.9;
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 4.9;
$sa_
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Joel,
>
>
>>Yes, I have $banned_namepath_re defined and $banned_filename_re=undef.
>>Am I missing something here? Do I need to use the new
>>$banned_filename_re instead of $banned_namepath_re when doing per
>>recipient banned checks? I want one definition for banned chec
MJ,
> Is there any statistics script for reporting SPAM and Virus statistics
> which can work with log_level=0 of amavis. I have tried the one
> available at http://flakshack.com/anti-spam/wiki/index.php it works fine
> only if the log_level => to 2.
One way would be to modify the utility amavisd
mess-mate,
> i'm using amavis (litte modified) with maia.
> Virus and Spam must be quarantined
> $QUARANTINEDIR = '/var/lib/amavis/virusmails';
> $virus_quarantine_method = "local:virus-%i-%n";# default
> $spam_quarantine_method = "local:spam-%b-%i-%n"; # default
> $final_virus_destiny
Mark Stover,
> Is it possible I amavisd-new to specify which users get notifications
> when a mail message was blocked or banned? I'd rather not turn on admin
> notifications and get a notice every single time there's a virus sent to
> one of our users. We have some users who wish to receive block
meow,
> Is there any way, without changing any perl code, without using NFS, to
> store quarantine files to remote machine by change amavis.conf?
Yes, specify a mail address as a $*_quarantine_to setting, then you can
configure MTA (local or remote) to store the quarantined message
any way you wa
Joel,
> Yes, I have $banned_namepath_re defined and $banned_filename_re=undef.
> Am I missing something here? Do I need to use the new
> $banned_filename_re instead of $banned_namepath_re when doing per
> recipient banned checks? I want one definition for banned checks but
> I'd like to be able t
Hello,
Is there any way, without changing any perl code, without using NFS, to
store quarantine files to remote machine by change amavis.conf?
if this looks like a stupid question, please forgive me,
I am just wondering...if amavis have this built-in function?
--
meow
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
