Re: [AMaViS-user] [SPF] Is it correct? Amavisd + SpamAssassin + pypolicyd-spf

2008-06-14 Thread Zhang Huangbin
Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Fri, June 13, 2008 15:36, Zhang Huangbin wrote: > > >>> header SPF_CHECK_FAIL Received-SPF =~ /^fail/i >>> or use proper case in a regexp. >>> >> It works now. Thanks Mark. ^_^ >> > > still one problem, the headers from pypolicyd-spf can be forged > > what

Re: [AMaViS-user] [SPF] Is it correct? Amavisd + SpamAssassin + pypolicyd-spf

2008-06-14 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, June 13, 2008 15:36, Zhang Huangbin wrote: >> header SPF_CHECK_FAIL Received-SPF =~ /^fail/i >> or use proper case in a regexp. > It works now. Thanks Mark. ^_^ still one problem, the headers from pypolicyd-spf can be forged what if the header was there before you add your own ? i sugg

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis score=x+10

2008-06-14 Thread Mark Martinec
Bernd, > I think the reason of this problem is the new bounce killer feature. > $bounce_killer_score was set to 10 and all log IDs containing score=x+ also > have an entry with "bounce killed". > > All quarantined mails have other mails attached as message/rfc822. The > bounce killer feature misle

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis score=x+10

2008-06-14 Thread Bernd Probst
Mark, I think the reason of this problem is the new bounce killer feature. $bounce_killer_score was set to 10 and all log IDs containing score=x+ also have an entry with "bounce killed". All quarantined mails have other mails attached as message/rfc822. The bounce killer feature misleadingly iden