Re: [AMaViS-user] Problem with DKIM signing a particular mail

2009-06-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, May 22, 2009 19:18, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Here is a patch to Mail::DKIM 0.33, but it should apply to older versions too: I will try it immediately and inform you of the outcome http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JASLONG/Mail-DKIM-0.36/ChangeLog seams updated now -- http://localhost/

Re: [AMaViS-user] Problem with DKIM signing a particular mail

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Martinec
On Monday 08 June 2009 12:19:20 Benny Pedersen wrote: Here is a patch to Mail::DKIM 0.33, but it should apply to older versions too: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JASLONG/Mail-DKIM-0.36/ChangeLog seams updated now Indeed, the 0.36 is out. As far as amavisd-new is concerned, the 0.35 or

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavis LDAP WhiteListSender

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Martinec
Christian, I am using the ldap schema from amavis for a while and it is doing a good job here. Sometimes, I get bounce-messages from some lists that my mx had rejected some mails. Can you tell me, how to whitelist a list? For example this list :-) amavisWhistelistSender=? Or do I need

[AMaViS-user] DKIM signing Sender vs. From domain

2009-06-08 Thread Josh Miller
I currently sign outgoing email with DKIM via amavisd-new 2.6.2 for over 1000 domains on a single host and noticed today that it is signing based on the email header from domain rather than the envelope header sender domain. Is there any way to tell amavisd-new (or is this a Mail::DKIM

[AMaViS-user] unRTF and amavisd-new 2.6.3

2009-06-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
is there a howto for this somewhere ? i would like to have amavisd doing unrtf rtf-file html-file and hand this html file to sa scanning -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :) -- Crystal Reports -

Re: [AMaViS-user] DKIM signing Sender vs. From domain

2009-06-08 Thread Mark Martinec
Josh, I currently sign outgoing email with DKIM via amavisd-new 2.6.2 for over 1000 domains on a single host and noticed today that it is signing based on the email header from domain rather than the envelope header sender domain. Yes, this is the first choice, if at all possible. The main

Re: [AMaViS-user] DKIM signing Sender vs. From domain

2009-06-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, June 9, 2009 02:41, Mark Martinec wrote: Benny Pedersen wrote: why allow From: and envelope_sender to be diff in the first place ? imho its your mta borking auth up for you, and you want dkim to sign the mess ? Sometimes you have no choice. Consider mailing lists for example.