Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis sometimes looses e-mails

2010-05-04 Thread d h
Check your config. Properly configured amavisd-new will not lose mail. The problem is, I don't know what to look for! I never worked with Postfix/Amavis until now. I have taken over someone else's job, he is not working here anymore. But he did tell me that he has been using this

[AMaViS-user] Clamav problem with amavis

2010-05-04 Thread Luc MAIGNAN
Hi, I use a amavis+clamav+spamassassin+postfix architecture. In most case, all works fine. But for several mails, I have this error : (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08725-02, virus_scan FAILED: AV: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED (in reply to end of DATA

Re: [AMaViS-user] Clamav problem with amavis

2010-05-04 Thread Andreas Schulze
Am 04.05.2010 09:48 schrieb Luc MAIGNAN: (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08725-02, virus_scan FAILED: AV: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED (in reply to end of DATA command)) Make your virusscanner running ! Al least while amavis is running. In most cases you don

Re: [AMaViS-user] Clamav problem with amavis

2010-05-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
Am 04.05.2010 09:48 schrieb Luc MAIGNAN: (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08725-02, virus_scan FAILED: AV: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED (in reply to end of DATA command)) Make your virusscanner running ! Al least while amavis is running. In most cases

Re: [AMaViS-user] Clamav problem with amavis

2010-05-04 Thread Luc MAIGNAN
No, I use the 0.96 version Le 04/05/2010 12:22, Giampaolo Tomassoni a écrit : Am 04.05.2010 09:48 schrieb Luc MAIGNAN: (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08725-02, virus_scan FAILED: AV: ALL VIRUS SCANNERS FAILED (in reply to end of DATA

Re: [AMaViS-user] Clamav problem with amavis

2010-05-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
No, I use the 0.96 version Do you get any error message from amavis? Try looking at the /var/log/messages file. Also try scanning something with both clamscan and clamdscan and look for any differences. It seems to me a problem related to the clamav installation, possibly introduced by

Re: [AMaViS-user] {?} Clamav problem with amavis

2010-05-04 Thread The Doctor
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: Hi, I use a amavis+clamav+spamassassin+postfix architecture. In most case, all works fine. But for several mails, I have this error : (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=08725-02, virus_scan

[AMaViS-user] Handling of encrypted mails

2010-05-04 Thread Gerd v. Egidy
Hi, I recently had problems concerning encrypted emails so I investigated a bit. Currently amavisd-new seems to do the following: attachments containing an encrypted archive (e.g. zip) are marked as UNDECIPHERABLE, the mail gets flagged with CC_UNCHECKED. A gpg-encrypted attachment (correctly

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis sometimes looses e-mails

2010-05-04 Thread David Watson
The mail ends in postfix, these are the last entries I can find: May 3 12:08:43 postfix/lmtp[17299]: 4F2284AEBB: to=InsideEmailAddress, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, conn_use=2, delay=2324, delays=14/2164/0/146, dsn=2.1.0, status=sent (250 2.1.0 Ok, id=19799-01-2, from

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis sometimes looses e-mails

2010-05-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 5/4/2010 1:57 AM, d h wrote: Check your config. Properly configured amavisd-new will not lose mail. The problem is, I don't know what to look for! I never worked with Postfix/Amavis until now. I have taken over someone else's job, he is not working here anymore. But he did tell me

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new-2.7.0-pre4 prerelease available

2010-05-04 Thread Jo Rhett
On Apr 25, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote: I kind of like ignoring deprecated options with the new behavior noted in RELEASE_NOTES. That way existing installations don't break after upgrade. Too many people update their whole system with yum or such without ever looking at what gets

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd-new-2.7.0-pre4 prerelease available

2010-05-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 5/4/2010 5:30 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: On Apr 25, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote: I kind of like ignoring deprecated options with the new behavior noted in RELEASE_NOTES. That way existing installations don't break after upgrade. Too many people update their whole system with yum or such