Mark Martinec escreveu:
A release candidate of amavisd-new-2.6.1 is available at:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-2.6.1-rc1.tar.gz
Release notes:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/release-notes.txt
The 2.6.1 is a maintenance release, fixing known problems over 2.6.0
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
Benny Pedersen escreveu:
On Mon, June 16, 2008 13:02, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to
something more helpful .
how ?
My idea
Hello,
I'm apparently having some AV-detected messages being delivered to
final users. Some lines from amavisd log:
Jun 16 06:52:37 correio amavis[2641]: (02641-18) run_av (ClamAV-clamd):
/var/amavis/amavis-20080615T230236-02641/parts INFECTED:
Email.Malware.Sanesecurity.0802
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
Hello,
I'm apparently having some AV-detected messages being delivered to
final users. Some lines from amavisd log:
Jun 16 06:52:37 correio amavis[2641]: (02641-18) run_av (ClamAV-clamd):
/var/amavis/amavis-20080615T230236-02641/parts
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
Forget it found it on RELEASE_NOTED from amavisd-2.6.0. It's
all about @virus_name_to_spam_score_maps
anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to
something more helpful .
maybe this variable could
MrC escreveu:
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Hello,
I have banned some file/MIME types in amavisd-2.6.0 using the 'old'
way of doing this, the $banned_filename_re.
The banned file admin and user notifications, which i enabled,
brings me something like:
Banned
Hello Guys,
i have a postfix box with amavis. ALL messages passes through
amavis, there's no exception for content_filter setting on postfix.
i would like to have a full email report, which, intentionally,
would give me for each message:
1) sender
2) recipient or recipients in
I'm doing some file blocking with amavisd and i noticed amavisd
2.6.0 can done file blocking on two different variables:
banned_filename_re
and
banned_namepath_re
(yes, use only one at a time, i know)
banned_namepath seems to me very complex. banned_filename is not
that simple,
Jo Rhett escreveu:
On May 21, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
One thing that i found REALLY bad about dkim is that the reputation
thing should be manually configured and not 'learned' or 'grabbed'
somehow from somewhere, just like SPF records that are DNS
Jo Rhett escreveu:
If the message is NOT DKIM-signed, then the verifier cant do
anything at all, unless it's manually configured for that.
Sure it can. Just like SPF, it should score the message according to
the published policy. Exactly the same as the sending IP not being
OK, i upgraded amavisd from 2.5.4 to 2.6.0, installed Mail::DKIM and
enabled dkim verification ... signing is next step.
I can see, in my logs, entries like:
May 20 18:35:14 correio amavis[14826]: (14826-06) dkim: VALID
MailFrom+Sender+Author signature by [EMAIL PROTECTED], From:
Jose Hales-Garcia escreveu:
In some backscatter messages I'm finding these header tag names
appearing in the body of the message (Amavis is increasingly popular)
which then causes problems in my scripts when I want to identify the
correct headers.
I'd think the solution would be to
Jose Hales-Garcia escreveu:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
what about adjusting your scripts and get them doing the right
thing, which would be evaluate headers and not body when looking for
amavis headers ???
I'm looking at that possibility
Hello Guys,
amavis decode email parts and store them on those directories
created just like $MYHOME/amavis-20080320T110410-11254 and store decoded
parts on the /parts directory.
Question is when AV is called, it's called on the temp
directory or only /parts one, which
as far as i know, there's only this command-line version of McAfee
virus scan for Linux. There's no daemonized version, afaik.
Anyway, if you're running McAfee for Linux, a commercial product,
you can always check with McAfee for the availability of such daemonized
version, altough i
Hi Guys,
Im having another problem with clamd 0.90 dying
I'm not using update scripts, tough i do have a script that runs and
grab a clamav-format malware database file (www.malware.com.br).
When a new definition file is downloaded, the update script issues a
'service clamd
Sorry guys . wrong mailing list ... forgive me.
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
Hi Guys,
Im having another problem with clamd 0.90 dying
I'm not using update scripts, tough i do have a script that runs and
grab a clamav-format malware database file
Hello Guys,
Is it possible to have @local_domains_maps variable stored in MySQL
database ? I wanna host several domains and dont want to alter some
external file for having all domains listed . i already does that
with read_hash, but i would like to have it fetch from MySQL ..
Awesome . that's what I need.
I was checking amavisd.conf-default and found an example on setting
up to another table, postfix_domains . that's pretty similar to my
real situation here.
Last doubt . after configuring things (lookup_sql_dsn and
sql_select_policy), how
Hello Guys,
With amavisd-new $log_level set to 2, i got some interesting
messages in my maillog file, about attachments in messages, just like:
Nov 29 16:55:48 correio amavis[3771]: (03771-17) p002 1/2 Content-Type:
application/pdf, size: 112575 B, name: Proposta Sicoob Goi\341s -
Guys i'm sure the answer must be clear for some but it
isnt clear for me what are the differences between AWL and pen pals soft
whitelisting, the new feature of 2.4.2.
Can you point me some advantages and disadvantages of each one,
comparing to the other ?
Thanks :)
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
