Michael Scheidell a écrit :
don't know why, I can't find any log entries to tell me, and it never
happened before, not on this one, or any of the others.
but, amavisd stopped, (no log entries).
amavisd start
Missing process ID in file /var/amavis/amavisd.pid at
/usr/local/sbin/amavisd
Noel Jones a écrit :
On 3/13/2010 2:26 AM, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
What param do I have to set
to avoid when user change its extension of exe files?
I wonder to block if possible better by file recogition rather than a
extension
LD
look in your amavisd.conf for the
Eduardo Júnior a écrit :
Hi,
I have set my Amavis in a independent machine, separate of postfix.
But when my Amavis is reinjecting the message to postfix, it does a
tcp connection to port 10025 (my config)
And, i'm using smtpd_helo_required = yes, and then my Amavis must
provide its
Ilo Lorusso a écrit :
Hi,
ive run postifx-logwatch and amavis-logwatch and have the results below,
something i dont understand is shouldnt the amount of Accepted message
in postfix
(79975 Accepted ) match the amount of Total scanned messages in
amavisd-new (47106 Total messages
LDB a écrit :
Thank you Eric ...
yes, the email message have the exact same times and
headers.
My MTA is postfix.
I am using POP. My mail client is Thunderbird.
Dovecot is POP/IMAP server.
did you disable address rewrite before the content filter. check
amavisd-new docs
troxlinux a écrit :
I solved my problem , the problema was this line
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain .domain.net.ni .domain.org.ni] )
you were quoting the whole list, which makes it a single string.
y changed this form
@local_domains_maps = ( [.$mydomain] )
if you need to add
troxlinux a écrit :
Hi list, I am trying to configure amavisd-new 2.6.2-3.1 with
spamassassin 3.2.5 + dcc +razor2+dkim , and for some reason, which is
not able to identify some mail like spam, doesn't mark them , for
example the test of GTUBE it doesn't put in the subject SPAM.
is the
Jeff Grossman a écrit :
I have just started using Postfix along with Amavis and everything
appears to be running pretty well. I do have one question, and I am
not sure if it relates to Amavis or to Postfix. I was running
Sendmail with MIMEDefang. I had my filter in MIMEDefang configured so
Dmitri Snytkine a écrit :
Hello!
I am just wondering what are the advantages of using Amavisd over just using
Spamassassin in daemon mode (spamd)
I mean spamd has support for dcc, razor, pyzor, dnsrbl, SPF, DKIM
You can also configure your own regex rules to check headers
What does the
Luigi Rosa a écrit :
Hi,
a big Italian ISP is using 1.x.x.x for its internal network. This annoying
behaviour is triggering a lot of false positive spam reports because of
RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP is worth 3.196 spam points.
Assuming that complaining with the folks of above-mentioned ISP is more
Curtis a écrit :
from this list.
Something with the mailing list is broken.
Please advise.
look at the headers. they contain:
List-Id: General discussion list about AMaViS
amavis-user.lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user,
Ralf Heidenreich a écrit :
Hello,
before i was using amavis in post-queue mode.
But due to german law, i must use amavis in pre-queue mode.
How can i accelerate amavis, to use it in pre-queue mode?
Ralf
Alexander Wirt schrieb:
Ralf Heidenreich schrieb am Montag, den 29. Dezember 2008:
Henrik K a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:15:22PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Hello,
before i was using amavis in post-queue mode.
But due to german law, i must use amavis in pre-queue mode.
How can i accelerate amavis, to use it in pre-queue mode?
\
Just curious:
What is english
Steve a écrit :
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:15:22 -0500
Von: Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net
[snip]
Just curious:
What is english translation of german law, something like
You must use amabisd-new in pre-queue mode under penalty of law?
Sie
Michael Scheidell a écrit :
The point is
that German law is saying that IF you take the mail, then you HAVE to deliver
it. You can theoretically take the mail into queue and not deliver it but you
need to get permission from the mail owner to do so. And if it comes hard on
hard, then the
Michael Scheidell a écrit :
mouss wrote:
now, what if spam is stored on an old and cheap HD?
dog ate my HD.
as well, I read its illegal to deliver harmful content.. like a virus.
I guess we can add all forms of fraud (phishes, 419, scam). The case of
falsification (forged From
Mark Martinec a écrit :
[snip]
SourceForge mailing lists unfortunately break signatures.
Perhaps it's time to consider moving the mailing list elsewhere.
They break more! see this header (will be wrapped by my mua?): They add
a X-Spam-Report header but don't encode it. so when the poster has
Ralf Heidenreich a écrit :
Hello mouss,
Hi Ralf,
my idea was to let amavis decide what to do with the mails.
But it is not easy, i think it is impossible.
Now I have the same idea as you. I let postfix run on 2 IPs.
One IP for reject, and one IP for taganddeliver.
Thank you for your
Ralf Heidenreich a écrit :
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis in pre-queue mode
Datum: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:26:09 +0100
Von: Ralf Heidenreich r...@lx-work.de
An: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz luis.daniel.lu...@gmail.com
Referenzen: 4947b648.8040...@lx-work.de
Ralf Heidenreich a écrit :
Hello,
i think i preferr the option with two ipaddresses.
and I agree with you!
cheers,
-- mouss
--
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future
Steve a écrit :
Hey! I am Swiss and looking what is happening over in Germany in some area
just makes me shake my head. But who am I? I don't get it and probably will
never get some of those strange laws.
we don't yet have such laws in .fr and I don't read german, but as (I
may) have said
Ralf Heidenreich a écrit :
Hello,
i have a problem. I have a mailserver (postfix), and amavis is working.
I am receiving mail for several domains. Some customers want the spam
delivering mode taganddeliver or reject. I have this realized with
policy banks. Amavis in post-queue mode works
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz a écrit :
Using CAT (language pluging) I got this:
Dec 8 20:07:04 soekris amavis[24051]: (24051-06) (!!)TROUBLE in check_mail:
parts_decode_ext FAILED: file(1) utility (/usr/bin/file) error: run_command
(open pipe): Can't fork at
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* Stefan Förster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#!/bin/bash
/etc/init.d/amavisd stop
cp -p /usr/sbin/amavisd /usr/sbin/amavisd.old
install -o root -g root -m 755 -p amavisd amavisd-agent amavisd-nanny
amavisd-release p0f-analyzer.pl /usr/sbin
/etc/init.d/amavisd start
John Andersen wrote:
Ok, someone please take that programmer out behind the wood shed.
grin
Return the installation CDROM and you'll get your money back ;-p
/grin
Gawd I hate cryptic useless error messages. Programmers should
lose a knuckle for each one written.
Then don't ask if all
John Andersen a écrit :
We scan mail inbound and outbound via Amavisd-New. (2.4.3 via Opensuse).
Occasionally someone will send something outbound that might get flagged
as spammy. Amavis then attaches our recipient delimiter +spam on the
outbound mail, all of which bounce.
amavisd-new
sorry for the dups. there's a problem somewhere...
lost connection with mx.sourceforge.net[216.34.181.68] while sending end
of data -- message may be sent more than once
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Andersen a écrit :
We scan mail inbound and outbound via Amavisd-New. (2.4.3 via Opensuse).
Occasionally someone will send something outbound
Michael Scheidell a écrit :
Well what i want to do is not to quarantinize a mail which includes a virus,
but to relay it as it is after removing the attachment and adding a little
notification, that the infected attachment was errased.
Amavisd does not want to 'edit/modify/muck with'
Tomasz Chmielewski a écrit :
mouss schrieb:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
As I'm not sure if it's Spamassassin's or amavisd-new's
configuration problem, I sent a similar mail to spamassasin list.
[snip]
just to close the issue for those who don't read spamassassin-users
(as well
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
mouss wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
OK, thanks. I've gotten so far now that amavisd reports the header
but it is not inserted into the actual message headers.
I tested the snippet I sent you and it worked.
amavis[1968]: (01968-01) header: X-Relay-Countries
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Yes, I suspect the recipient is not regarded as local in this case.
I use the unmodified snippet you provided (thanks).
All spams end up in [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I presumed was a
local recipient because inter-sonic.com is in the local domain list and
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
mouss wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Yes, I suspect the recipient is not regarded as local in this case.
I use the unmodified snippet you provided (thanks).
All spams end up in [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I presumed was a
local recipient because inter-sonic.com
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
OK, thanks. I've gotten so far now that amavisd reports the header but
it is not inserted into the actual message headers.
I tested the snippet I sent you and it worked.
amavis[1968]: (01968-01) header: X-Relay-Countries: VN\n
--per
Michael Scheidell wrote:
we really don't need amavisd-new mailing list cluttered up by idiots and
their backscanner/chalange response crap.
how stupid can you get? subscribe to a mailing list and point to a CR
system?
how about a postfix header_checks:
/^X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
[snip]
Also, the docs say Also for 3.1.0, you can apply a patch [WWW]
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3815 which will allow
you to add a separate MIME header that shows all the message's relay
countries, independent of the rules.
add_header
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Anyone else seeing this every time you send an email to this list? It
looks like mx.sourceforge.net initiates the check right after the RCPT
TO: stage in the SMTP session (mind the wrapping):
yes, been like that since a long time. here is a recent log.
Sep 19 01:48:07
Jake Vickers wrote:
Does Amavisd-new have the capability of blocking zip files that contain
EXE files? I'd like to allow zip files, but only if they do not contain
EXE files within them.
That's the default behaviour. amavisd-new will see the banned file
inside the zip.
Patrick Domack wrote:
Quoting mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Halil A??n wrote:
so it's a question for the maildrop mailing list. see below however.
[snip]
# Drop anything listed as Spam into .Spam
#
if (/^X-Spam-Flag: *YES/)
{
to $DEFAULT/spam/
Shouldn't that be:
if (/^X-Spam
Halil Ağın wrote:
Hello List;
I have a mailing system with
postfix+ldap+courier+amavisd-new+clamav+maildrop.
The os is debian etch.
There is no problem receiving and sending mail either it is spam or not.
I am trying to enable spam folder for each user on my system.
I want to
Juan Miscaro wrote:
Is it possible to have 2 levels of subject-line tagging based on
score? So that for all forwarded mail:
A score = B gets tagged with SPAM1
B score gets tagged with SPAM2
That way, spam 1 can be filtered to a folder normal_spam and spam 2
can be filtered to
Patrick Baer wrote:
Hi all,
I feel a bit dumb asking this question, but...
I have a pretty buggy spamassassin issue here and need to use an
external amavis-server while debugging, otherwise the whole company will
be after me soon :)
The problem is, I cannot connect to 10024 of the
Sebastian Deiszner wrote:
Hello,
some of my Mails are moved to quarantine with header:
what do you mean by moved? they are copied. but the recipient gets the
message since the corresponding action is D_PASS.
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E4 hex): Date: ...8
Carlos Williams wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Alexander Wirt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you use clamav-daemon, make sure that it is configured to init
supplementary groups when it drops priviledges, and that you add the
clamav user to the amavis group: add
Len Conrad wrote:
[snip]
I changed the file to vscan:vscan, su'd to vscan and command line
spamassassin returned:
Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 5.0 required)
what tests where hit?
also, what results do you see if you reinject the message into
amavisd-new? it is possible that
James Brown wrote:
I have amavisd-new recently installed on my mail server (postfix
running on Mac OS X 10.4.11).
How can I stop it scanning outgoing email?
This is more or less a FAQ here and on the postfix list.
http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bypassing.html
Marcelo Diniz wrote:
No, it's not opensource for now. Maybe in the future =]
if you want to manage amavisd-new options, understand the available
options and manage them. do not take it the other way around.
2008/7/15 Murilo Opsfelder Araújo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:10
Marcelo Diniz wrote:
Well, i think this discussion it's getting to another way. All i want to
know if it is possible to blacklist ip's in AMaViS because AMaViS is already
doing the work for domains and emails. Is it possible?
AFAIK, not without changing the code.
Marcelo Diniz wrote:
Hi,
I searched at the AMaViS documentation and didn't found this information.
Can the AMaViS black list IP's?
why don't you do that in your MTA?
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your
Michael Scheidell wrote:
[snip]
sharpen up your SA rules, justin: time to watch those rules, including
the 'forged from yahoo' rules.
no spf records. wonder if they will dkim sign them:
$ host -t txt ymail.com
ymail.com has no TXT record
$ host -t txt rocketmail.com
rocketmail.com
Tom Brown wrote:
Usually that's an indication that the BL has shut down or moved long
ago and has finally given up on getting people to respect it and remove
the config.
Googling, I find a message from 2003 (!) indicating that
blackholes.wirehub.net had changed its name.
Michael Scheidell wrote:
I am confused, this press release says barracuda networks tried to buy
sourcefire, not that sourcefire tried to buy clamav.
Anyone know what is going on?
Did sourcefire buy clamav or not?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to do this? i.e. if a subject line matches a certain string
and possibly the same recipient to add a score in order to make it a
spam mail?
Use SpamAssassin rules for this, no need to duplicate its functionality
in amavisd. Something like
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I tried to verify the results of Mike Capella's amavis-logwatch scripts and
had to notice that the amavislogsumm.pl scripts had some faults. I fixed them
and put the new script online:
https://po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/amavislogsumm
I recommend to
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Wazir Shpoon schrieb:
Try:
sendmail -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] virusmail.eml
Did I forget to mention that I don't have any MTA running on the machine
where amavisd-new sits?
# sendmail -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] spam-3+qujZLjJ2Sg
postdrop: warning: unable to
Sahil Tandon wrote:
* Oskar Liljeblad [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-16-2008]:
if you are running amavisd-new after the queue, then it is too late to
reject spam: this will only cause backscatter.
That's why I only use amavis before queue! IMHO after-queue is not
acceptable nowadays
Thomas Gelf wrote:
Amavisd-new seems to use localhost_name for it's own EHLO,
but is using $myheloname for it's own SMTP greeting banner
(and 250 reply to HELO). I'm curious to find out why this
variable is defined as follows:
my($myheloname);
# $myheloname = c('myhostname');
#
Oskar Liljeblad wrote:
Would it be possible to set up/hack amavis to return a reject response (554
- D_REJECT) for spam but still deliver it to addresses in the spam lovers
list? With the current behaviour you would get an OK result (250 - D_PASS)
from amavis and the mail would be sent to the
Martin Orr wrote:
On 21/04/08 00:32, Gary V wrote:
msa:~# apt-get -t testing install libmail-dkim-perl
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
binutils libc6 libc6-dev libc6-i686 libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl
mouss wrote:
Andrew Nady wrote:
Hi,
I am having some difficulties with programs that use postfix's or other
MTA's sendmail command to send out email as oppose to SMTP connection.
The sendmail triggered email gets marked as SPAM, and I have no idea as to
how to trick amavis to not check
Andrew Nady wrote:
Hi,
I am having some difficulties with programs that use postfix's or other
MTA's sendmail command to send out email as oppose to SMTP connection.
The sendmail triggered email gets marked as SPAM, and I have no idea as to
how to trick amavis to not check the emails
Michael Scheidell wrote:
From:
http://search.cpan.org/src/OLAF/Net-DNS-0.63/Changes
Fix rt.cpan.org #30316 Security issue with Net::DNS Resolver.
Net/DNS/RR/A.pm in Net::DNS 0.60 build 654 allows remote attackers
to cause a denial of service (program croak) via a crafted DNS
response
Mark Martinec wrote:
Luis Daniel,
I was debugging amavisd and I found this:
brandmauer amavis[6320]: (06320-02-3) TIMING [total 45329 ms] - SMTP
pre-DATA-flush: 403 (1%)1, SMTP DATA: 62 (0%)1, check_init: 126 (0%)1,
digest_hdr: 2 (0%)1, digest_body: 9 (0%)1, gen_mail_id: 8 (0%)1,
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
I also got:
Mar 13 11:54:00 brandmauer amavis[24026]: (24026-01) (!!)TROUBLE in
process_request: Error writing a SMTP response to the socket: Broken pipe at
(eval 41) line 874, GEN3 line 4.
at my /var/log/mail/error.log
Port 10025 is open:
[EMAIL
Daniel Mayer [COUGA.net] wrote:
Hi,
we are working on evolving our amavisd-new setup from one to two machines.
Box 1 providing the final delivery to the mailbox and box 2 performing spam
and virus filtering guided by amavisd-new.
The question is where to point the MX's of the domains to?
Christopher J Shaker wrote:
Clifton:
I am pretty sure amavisd-new does *not* work this way. It has an
implicit list of checks to run on each incoming mail, starting with
virus scanning, and works its way through them. If it's working this
way for you, it may be the result of something
Jef Driesen wrote:
I have a small postfix/amavis/dovecot mailserver for my home network.
Mails are retrieved with fetchmail and delivered to postfix with amavis
as a after-queue content filter. It works great, except that after the
upgrade from Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) to 7.10 (Gutsy
Jef Driesen wrote:
mouss wrote:
[snip]
Since IPs and domains are dynamically added to DNSBLs and URIBLs, the
example you show is normal: some IPs and URIs have been listed since
the first run. This happens all the time.
That said, make sure amavisd is started with the right config
Mike Cisar wrote:
Hi all,
Running Sendmail/Amavis/Spamassassin/Dovecot on a couple of servers. About
50% of the users prefer to be spoon-fed their SPAM in their inbox, for the
other 50% or so we've set up to sort their SPAM into an IMAP spam folder
using plussed addressing.
A number of
MrC wrote:
Andrea Bencini wrote:
Andrea Bencini wrote:
I installed postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8, amavisd-new-2.5.2-2.fc8 and
spamassassin-3.2.3-2.fc8.
They are running.
I would like to test spam changing score in local.cf.
My local.cf is:
score FREE_PORN 1000
score
Mike Cisar wrote:
Have had a few messages getting through lately that should have been tagged
as spam but appear not to have the subject line tagged.
I check the headers and see (some headers removed)...
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 9.498
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes,
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I see a message get sent through and labeled 'WARNING: contains banned
part' like it should according to our banned policies as it scores zero
in SA. I am assuming zero means that SA didn't even scan the content? If
I take the source of the message without the
rupert wrote:
Hi,
i have a cyrus murder cluster with postfix and started integrating amavis
for content filtering.
When I send an email to a user of a virtuall domain that isnt the local
domain the postfix host is in everthing is fine.
When i send an email to a user that is in the same
lartc wrote:
hi all,
i've been getting tons of male-enhancement spam mails that are making it
through amavis ... they look like:
Women DO luv it bigger.
http://google.co.uk//search?hl=enq=inurl:rhtawy.com%2BVPXL%2BMade%
2BEasybtnI=markov
I don't want to filter on a google link
Michael Scheidell wrote:
host -t txt ibm.com
ibm.com descriptive text v=spf1 -all
What does that mean? with -all, does that mean that since there are NO
records at all that all email should hardfail? or all should pass?
ibm: what were you thinking? Why bother?
That's a correct choice
Jordi Moles wrote:
hi,
i've got 2 debian servers, one with postfix and the other one with
amavisd-new running.
I've read a lot of examples about how to set up amavisd-new to filter
emails that come from postfix.
The thing is that in amavisd.conf i have to put something like this:
john bender wrote:
Thanks mouss, I'll try that.
Regarding the other notes, the smtp/lmtp are there
because I was following the amavis install guide.
but you only need one. and if you configure both, chose different names.
Regarding the mynetworks, etc, that's all from me
trying
john bender wrote:
Hi there!
I'm running Qmail, and on the same system I run
postfix as a smart host or spam firewall.
Qmail listens on x.x.x.42 and postfix listens on
x.x.x.43
From what I read, this setup might be causing the
error in question. My question is: would anyone know
Ken Morley wrote:
I'm using Postfix 2.4.6, Amavisd-new 2.5.2, ClamAV 0.91.2 and
Mail-SpamAssassin 3.2.3 in a Linux mail filter. I'm having problems
conveniently getting enough ham and spam for Bayes training. I'm aware
that Bayes is more closely related to SA than Amavisd, but please humor
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
from my amavid-new log I saw that a significant protion of spam is
generated inside my network. Here the command:
# cat /var/log/amavis | grep -i Blocked SPAM, LOCAL
I have configured Postfix so that it lookups an IP for client access to
my SMTP gataway.
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
from my amavid-new log I saw that a significant protion of spam is
generated inside my network. Here the command:
# cat /var/log/amavis | grep -i Blocked SPAM, LOCAL
I have configured Postfix so that it lookups an IP for
client access
to my SMTP gataway. If
Javier wrote:
thank you all for your kind answers...
i understand the solution is a non-lotus smtp server to process the
mail routing...
but i have another question regarding your sugestions...
can i perhaps have a smtp (postfix) in front of my lotus smtp?
something like this..
MrC wrote:
Voytek Eymont wrote:
On Mon, October 15, 2007 5:55 pm, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I didn't know amavislogsumm, but I can see in the changelog that the
last version is dated on feb-2004. It seems an old and out-of-date
project. ¿Do you know amavis-logwatch [1]? It's devepelod by
Adam65535 wrote:
On 10/9/07, Pelletier, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using ClamAV. It's a perfect match with Amavis, it's fast and get's
high in the reviews.
In my experiences clamav/clamd is much slower than other mail scanners (even
when up against command line scanners like
Adam65535 wrote:
On 10/10/07, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam65535 wrote:
On 10/9/07, Pelletier, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using ClamAV. It's a perfect match with Amavis, it's fast and get's
high in the reviews.
In my experiences clamav/clamd is much slower than other mail
Ricardo Stella wrote:
We are currently testing (not my choice) a hosted anti-spam server,
primarily to get rid of the bulk of spam. So our domain MX records
point to their servers, and they deliver lower level junk to us.
Trying to gray and whitelist some senders, it seems that my local.cf
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Ah, ok, I had not seen enough additional value using p0f (I turned it
off, too much cpu usage for a very small point percentage) and the fact
that it really can't figure out the difference between a windows 2000
server and an XP workstation.
So, if there a regex
Miguel wrote:
I mean, both can do the same tests, where is the best place to do that?
regards
do both:
- use few safe DNSBLs (zen.spamhaus.org for example) in the MTA to
reject transaction without having to process data or queue the message
- use whatever DNSBLs you want in SA.
- you can
Nate wrote:
I've read all the back threads regarding purge performance in the
logging database, specifically in mysql. It seems like a still
pending issue. In our application where we are increasing the rows
in the msgs table by roughly 1million per day, purging the database
creates an
Justin Kim wrote:
Gary wrote:
Justin wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am using amavis with postfix+mysql setup.
Amavis is scanning messages and is reinjecting messages to
postfix through
smtp.
I would like to know how can I manage spam scores so that
Cian Davis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I was wondering if there's an easy way of getting amavisd-new to
rewrite the subject of virus infected e-mail? I just want to add a
INFECTED tag or something. Our users scream if we bounce any mail on
them but most
Tomas Macek wrote:
But if the user is virus lover, it's his thing if he want the virus to be
delivered into his mailbox and in this case he should be noticed, that the
message contains a virus.
Will said virus lover pay for the consequences when his machine
infects the rest of the
Cian Davis wrote:
mouss wrote on 22/07/07 18:20:
Will said virus lover pay for the consequences when his machine
infects the rest of the world? viruses are different than spam. They are
digital massive destruction weapons.
I understand the argument against delivering viruses
Stefan.G wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:27:47PM +0200, mouss wrote:
Stefan.G wrote:
Sometimes i get not the Date BAD HEADER Error
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E2 hex):
X-eBay-due:\n\t\\342\\25431,76\\n
Some webmail and bulkware clients
Stefan.G wrote:
Sometimes i get not the Date BAD HEADER Error
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char E2 hex):
X-eBay-due:\n\t\\342\\25431,76\\n
Some webmail and bulkware clients are broken and send 8bit headers
without encoding them. There's nothing you can do about
Azfar Hashmi wrote:
when ever I test ms outlook connection settings amavisd-new consider it spam
any idea how to fix it.
how can we tell without the full headers?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Azfar Hashmi wrote:
thanks guys now where do I get long list of rbl servers to add those in
script.
Prefer quality over quantity.
but if you insist on quantity, take a look at the lists on dnsstuff site
or google for check rbl and on the sites that you find, do a lookup of
an IP and you'll
Xueron Nee wrote:
Hi Azfar Hashmi,
Here is a simple perl script to do this :)
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
[snip]
a less sofisticated shell version:
#!/bin/sh
ip_list=`grep -v ^# /path/to/ips`
rbl_zones=`grep -v ^# /path/to/rbls`
check_ip()
{
ip=$1
zone=$2
rev_ip=`echo $ip | awk
Renato Botelho wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a SMTP server project that involves a lot of filters.
I'm using postfix, amavisd-new and maildrop. Amavisd-new is
quarantining messages on PostgreSQL server.
After message is checked by amavisd-new, postfix forward this to
maildrop to make some
Gary V wrote:
I am doing some tests on a Debian machine with the Debian 2.4.2
package and the postfixadmin vacation.pl script and I noticed that
because the vacation program sends a mail out on the recipient's behalf
the sender is now a penpal. If a spammer sends out more than one
message
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
