Michael,
more perl 5.8.9 issues? Or did I miss a patch in between testing updates
and patching?
Mar 22 23:00:27 mx1 amavis[34688]: (34688-15) (!)Decoding of p002 (Zip
archive data, at least v2.0 to extract) failed, leaving it unpacked:
Insecure dependency in sysopen while running with -T
Hi,
This bug that was fixed in 2.6.2 is present in Debian Lenny(2.6.1):
From 2.6.2 release notes:
- envelope sender address for administrator- and recipient notifications
($mailfrom_notify_admin, $mailfrom_notify_spamadmin,
$mailfrom_notify_recip,
%mailfrom_notify_admin_by_ccat,
Rafael,
This bug that was fixed in 2.6.2 is present in Debian Lenny(2.6.1):
From 2.6.2 release notes:
- envelope sender address for administrator- and recipient notifications
($mailfrom_notify_admin, $mailfrom_notify_spamadmin,
$mailfrom_notify_recip,
Michael,
It would be a patch chunk '@@ -21931,7 +21936,8 @@' in FreeBSD ports.
I should have replied.. After making sure all patches were installed, it
didn't happen again. 5.8.10 in ports now? Crap.
I don't know anything I hate more then the freebsd perl ports upgrade.
--
Michael
Michael,
I should have replied.. After making sure all patches were installed,
it didn't happen again.
Good. So it could have been the known and fixed thing.
5.8.10 in ports now? Crap.
5.10.0, not 5.8.10
Mark
Am/On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:00:01 -0400 schrieb/wrote Michael Scheidell:
Michael,
It would be a patch chunk '@@ -21931,7 +21936,8 @@' in FreeBSD ports.
I should have replied.. After making sure all patches were installed, it
didn't happen again. 5.8.10 in ports now? Crap.
I don't know
Clamav .95 (available in Freebsd Ports), and appears to be upward
compatible with amavisd-new...
Has added a new set of signatures, based on Google's 'safebrowsing' feature.
(on google, you go where you arn't supposed to go via a google lookup,
and they warn you)
This same set of url's is
Am/On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 11:00:01 -0400 schrieb/wrote Michael Scheidell:
Michael,
It would be a patch chunk '@@ -21931,7 +21936,8 @@' in FreeBSD ports.
I should have replied.. After making sure all patches were installed, it
didn't happen again. 5.8.10 in ports now? Crap.
I don't
sanesecurity site:
refrences this archived email:
says to set bypass_decode_parts=1 in amavisd.conf
amavisd says to set it to 0 if you are using bounce_killer or using
'file' to guess the attachment type.
(i have it set to 0, using bounce killer and file)
Michael Scheidell wrote:
sanesecurity site:
refrences this archived email:
says to set bypass_decode_parts=1 in amavisd.conf
amavisd says to set it to 0 if you are using bounce_killer or using
'file' to guess the attachment type.
(i have it set to 0, using bounce killer and file)
sanesecurity site:
refrences this archived email:
says to set bypass_decode_parts=1 in amavisd.conf
Like bill says, you need one or the other.
Now, looking at readmes' and example.
header L_AV_Phish X-Amavis-AV-Status =~ m{\b(Email|HTML)\.Phishing\.}i
header L_AV_SS_Phish
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:43:00PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
and it looks like sane security test #2 and 3 did fail if I don't do
this in amavisd.conf:
(uncomment out the qr'^MAIL'.
so, 'can be slow'. how slow is it? and is bill landry wrong saying I
need
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:43:00PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
and it looks like sane security test #2 and 3 did fail if I don't do
this in amavisd.conf:
(uncomment out the qr'^MAIL'.
so, 'can be slow'. how slow is it? and is bill landry wrong saying
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:08:35PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:43:00PM -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
and it looks like sane security test #2 and 3 did fail if I don't do
this in amavisd.conf:
(uncomment out the qr'^MAIL'.
14 matches
Mail list logo
