Re: [AMaViS-user] (!)WARN: Using cpio instead of pax can be a security risk;

2006-11-30 Thread MK [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
At 00:49 30.11.2006, you wrote: I personally have no real answers for you on this, but doesn't your distro have 'pax' available where you could simply install the pax package/port/whatever? no distro - it's linux from scratch... Gary V

Re: [AMaViS-user] (!)WARN: Using cpio instead of pax can be a security risk;

2006-11-30 Thread MK [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
At 01:54 30.11.2006, you wrote: why can using cpio be a security risk? (i'm using cpio (GNU cpio) 2.7) cpio can be tricked to decode multiple archive components into the same file, overwriting previous contents, which could help in camouflaging a virus. thank you for explaining it. pax has

Re: [AMaViS-user] Global symbol @additional_perl_modules requires explicit package name

2006-11-30 Thread vigor
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Gary V wrote: vigor wrote: I added in amavisd.conf the next lines @additional_perl_modules = qw( /etc/mail/spamassassin/FuzzyOcr.pm MLDBM String::Approx ); and got an error on reload Reloading amavisd: Error in config file /etc/amavisd.conf: Global

[AMaViS-user] Determining which rules a clean message violated

2006-11-30 Thread MBGaskins
I'm currently using a the common Postfix/Amavisd-new/SpamAssassin combo to filter messages before passing them onto my Lotus Domino server. This is working well, and I've written a little PHP frontend to handle quarantine searches as well as releasing/training on messages. To facilitate

Re: [AMaViS-user] SA whitelist usage

2006-11-30 Thread Andres
On 11/29/06, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user could send emails before with no problem... Thanks! This may give you some ideas: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bypassing.html#10 Gary V Hey Gary, what is the objetive of setting whitelist and trusted_networks if them will be not

Re: [AMaViS-user] Determining which rules a clean message violated

2006-11-30 Thread Leon Kolchinsky
Hi, You have number of options to do that: 1. Check the file for particular scoring with: # spamassassin -t -D mailfile. 2. in amavisd.conf (this option will show you the scorings for all mails, not only for spam): $sa_tag_level_deflt = -999; Regards, Leon Kolchinsky -Original

Re: [AMaViS-user] SA whitelist usage

2006-11-30 Thread Gary V
Andres wrote: On 11/29/06, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user could send emails before with no problem... Thanks! This may give you some ideas: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bypassing.html#10 Gary V Hey Gary, what is the objetive of setting whitelist and trusted_networks

Re: [AMaViS-user] SA whitelist usage

2006-11-30 Thread Gary V
Gary wrote: Andres wrote: On 11/29/06, Gary V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user could send emails before with no problem... Thanks! This may give you some ideas: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/bypassing.html#10 Gary V Hey Gary, what is the objetive of setting whitelist and

[AMaViS-user] Unchecked bug?

2006-11-30 Thread Henrik Krohns
Hi, when you receive mail with encrypted zip.. On HAM: Passed UNCHECKED. SPAM-TAG line is logged. Everything fine. On SPAM: Blocked UNCHECKED. SPAM(-TAG) line is not logged, bug? Also wouldn't it be more clear to report Blocked SPAM in this case? Or is this some configuration issue I

Re: [AMaViS-user] spam reports get spam treatment, how to workaround ?

2006-11-30 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, November 30, 2006 2:16 pm, Gary V wrote: Voytek wrote: On Thu, November 30, 2006 12:45 pm, Gary V wrote: is this the go: ? - pickupfifo n - n 60 1 pickup -o receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks -o content_filter= Yes, you can