Is it possible to control if Amavisd should use RBLs based on a user's profile?
Currently I can set local_tests_only to disable RBL, but if I can
enable/disable
it based on LDAP attribute that would be sufficient.
Lund
--
Jorgen Lundman | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Administrator | +81
Hi,
I have amavisd-new install by yum on my FC5 box.
I used the http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.sql.txt file to
configure mysql and amavis.
I changed my amavisd.conf file to include:
$sql_select_policy = 'SELECT *,users.id FROM users,policy'.
' WHERE (users.policy_id=policy.id)
Hello all,
I've been trying to come up with a way to allow some of our internal
users to send mail without it being intercepted by banned checks set by
$banned_filename_re.
So far, I've tried to use bypass_banned_checks_maps as show bellow :
@bypass_banned_checks_maps = (
{'[EMAIL
Jorgen,
Is it possible to control if Amavisd should use RBLs based on a user's
profile? Currently I can set local_tests_only to disable RBL, but if I can
enable/disable it based on LDAP attribute that would be sufficient.
That is conceptually not possible: message can have multiple
Andre wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to come up with a way to allow some of our internal
users to send mail without it being intercepted by banned checks set by
$banned_filename_re.
So far, I've tried to use bypass_banned_checks_maps as show bellow :
Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the
spam
It seems that some braniac at barracuda decided to 'block' any messages
with sourceforge's survery signature with it's great intent analysis.
Instead of adding score, they simply block...
--
°(((=((===°°°(((===
On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
looking at
Trey Nolen wrote:
On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trey Nolen wrote:
We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam
tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are
starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are
AMAVIS SECURITY ADVISORY
ASA-2006-1: Convert::UUlib 1.04 exploitable buffer overflow
IMPACT
Gain shell access to a remote system running a content filter
which uses Convert::UUlib 1.04 or earlier.
HOW TO CHECK
The following command will write version of the module to stdout:
perl
Hello all,
I installed some days ago amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) without
any problems and tested it against virus successfuly.
(I'm using it with clamav)
Yesterday I discovered that it was stopped and can't be
started anymore.
In my logs or with the debug option, one could read:
Dec 8
I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how
that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all
delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the
email among multiple servers? We cannot just do it on a per-domain
basis, because some
12 matches
Mail list logo