[AMaViS-user] User settable option for RBLs?

2006-12-08 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Is it possible to control if Amavisd should use RBLs based on a user's profile? Currently I can set local_tests_only to disable RBL, but if I can enable/disable it based on LDAP attribute that would be sufficient. Lund -- Jorgen Lundman | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Administrator | +81

[AMaViS-user] Amavis SQL Blaclist mail bounce

2006-12-08 Thread Gert Horne
Hi, I have amavisd-new install by yum on my FC5 box. I used the http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.sql.txt file to configure mysql and amavis. I changed my amavisd.conf file to include: $sql_select_policy = 'SELECT *,users.id FROM users,policy'. ' WHERE (users.policy_id=policy.id)

[AMaViS-user] bypass_banned_checks_maps and its meaning

2006-12-08 Thread Andre Luis Lopes
Hello all, I've been trying to come up with a way to allow some of our internal users to send mail without it being intercepted by banned checks set by $banned_filename_re. So far, I've tried to use bypass_banned_checks_maps as show bellow : @bypass_banned_checks_maps = ( {'[EMAIL

Re: [AMaViS-user] User settable option for RBLs?

2006-12-08 Thread Mark Martinec
Jorgen, Is it possible to control if Amavisd should use RBLs based on a user's profile? Currently I can set local_tests_only to disable RBL, but if I can enable/disable it based on LDAP attribute that would be sufficient. That is conceptually not possible: message can have multiple

Re: [AMaViS-user] bypass_banned_checks_maps and its meaning

2006-12-08 Thread Gary V
Andre wrote: Hello all, I've been trying to come up with a way to allow some of our internal users to send mail without it being intercepted by banned checks set by $banned_filename_re. So far, I've tried to use bypass_banned_checks_maps as show bellow :

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd with spamc/spamd for load balancing

2006-12-08 Thread Stuart Johnston
Trey Nolen wrote: We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are looking at amavisd-new as a replacement, but we have an issue with the spam

[AMaViS-user] OT - barracuda was blocking amavis list and everything from sourceforge

2006-12-08 Thread Ricardo Stella
It seems that some braniac at barracuda decided to 'block' any messages with sourceforge's survery signature with it's great intent analysis. Instead of adding score, they simply block... -- °(((=((===°°°(((===

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd with spamc/spamd for load balancing

2006-12-08 Thread Trey Nolen
On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trey Nolen wrote: We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are looking at

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd with spamc/spamd for load balancing

2006-12-08 Thread Stuart Johnston
Trey Nolen wrote: On 12/8/06, Stuart Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trey Nolen wrote: We are currently using qmail-scanner for virus scanning and spam tagging. We process over 1.5 million messages per day and are starting to run into performance issues with qmail-scanner. We are

[AMaViS-user] ASA-2006-1: Convert::UUlib 1.04 exploitable buffer overflow

2006-12-08 Thread Mark Martinec
AMAVIS SECURITY ADVISORY ASA-2006-1: Convert::UUlib 1.04 exploitable buffer overflow IMPACT Gain shell access to a remote system running a content filter which uses Convert::UUlib 1.04 or earlier. HOW TO CHECK The following command will write version of the module to stdout: perl

[AMaViS-user] Amavis doesn't start anymore

2006-12-08 Thread Philippe Lefevre
Hello all, I installed some days ago amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822) without any problems and tested it against virus successfuly. (I'm using it with clamav) Yesterday I discovered that it was stopped and can't be started anymore. In my logs or with the debug option, one could read: Dec 8

Re: [AMaViS-user] amavisd with spamc/spamd for load balancing

2006-12-08 Thread Melissa Evans
I am not opposed to multiple amavisd-new servers, but I'm not sure how that would be implemented with our setup. The messages are all delivered to one server, so how do you propose that we distribute the email among multiple servers? We cannot just do it on a per-domain basis, because some