On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:59:24PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Wondering, for SA (awl, bayes?) how valuable is the DBI persistent plugin?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DBIPlugin
I have no idea, but I've been using it for a year without problems. I guess
it should help.
On 2008-04-11, 13:28, Gary V wrote:
Because the message scored less than your kill_level:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#tagkill
...
The admin will not be notified unless the message scores at kill_level
or higher.
For MYNETS I don't want to tag or block any mails
Michael,
Wondering, for SA (awl, bayes?) how valuable is the DBI persistent plugin?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DBIPlugin
Don't know how valuable it would be,
but you'll have to wait until amavisd-new-2.6.0-rc2
for the DBIPlugin to have any connection caching effect,
as current
On 4/14/08, Andy Spiegl wrote:
On 2008-04-11, 13:28, Gary V wrote:
Because the message scored less than your kill_level:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#tagkill
...
The admin will not be notified unless the message scores at kill_level
or higher.
For MYNETS I
Jose Hales-Garcia escreveu:
In some backscatter messages I'm finding these header tag names
appearing in the body of the message (Amavis is increasingly popular)
which then causes problems in my scripts when I want to identify the
correct headers.
I'd think the solution would be to
On Apr 14, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
what about adjusting your scripts and get them doing the right
thing, which would be evaluate headers and not body when looking for
amavis headers ???
I'm looking at that possibility. The library I'm using (Ruby's Tmail)
Jose,
Where do I override the header tag names used by Amavis? That is, the
tag names: X-Spam-Flag, X-Spam-Hits, X-Spam-Score, X-Spam-Status.
In some backscatter messages I'm finding these header tag names
appearing in the body of the message (Amavis is increasingly popular)
which then
On Apr 14, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Is this a good idea?
If your software is finding such strings in a _body_ of a mail,
it is seriously flawed and needs to be fixed. If it is only looking
at the header, you are already on the safe side by default.
The duplicate header tags
Jose Hales-Garcia escreveu:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
what about adjusting your scripts and get them doing the right
thing, which would be evaluate headers and not body when looking for
amavis headers ???
I'm looking at that possibility. The
On Apr 14, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Jose Hales-Garcia wrote:
The TMail library keeps header info in a hash, so it's retaining the
last 'X-Spam-Score' header encountered with a value of '*',
instead of the one with '16.06'.
There is a typo. It is supposed to be '16.07'.
Jose
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:21:57PM -0700, Jose Hales-Garcia wrote:
On Apr 14, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Is this a good idea?
If your software is finding such strings in a _body_ of a mail,
it is seriously flawed and needs to be fixed. If it is only looking
at the
11 matches
Mail list logo
