-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Christian Purnomo
Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juni 2008 08:45
An: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: [AMaViS-user] Amavis bottleneck?
Hi All
We are running Postfix +
Hi,
I'm running a Postfix 2.4.5 an Amavisd-new 2.5.2 on OpenSuse 10.3.
My setup is Postfix/Amavisd-new as mailgateway (to an internal network) with
several domains.
Up to now I provided same spam-handling to all domains (postfix -
smtpd_proxy_filter - amavisd-new/sa = working fine).
Now I
Leon Kolchinsky wrote:
Hi All
We are running Postfix + amavisd-new-2.3.3-3 in our linux mail gateway.
We have been hit hard lately with SPAM and our mail queue has been
growing significantly to 10,000+ mails and it takes a few hours for the
queue to go down. We received 1.6million spam
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis bottleneck?
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:46:40PM +0200
Quoting Bernd Probst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
: Increasing the number of $max_servers should increase throughput as long as
: enough memory is. Since you already set $max_servers = 25 I think you're
: system is
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis bottleneck?
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:22:06AM -0400
Quoting Shelley Waltz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
: Adding the rbl will dramatically decrease spam from the queue. I found that
: installing a caching nameserver on the postfix smtp server host improved
:
: Increasing the number of $max_servers should increase throughput as long
as
: enough memory is. Since you already set $max_servers = 25 I think you're
: system is permanently in a state of swapping. You should check memory
: allocation and the average time amavis needs to check a mail.
:
--On Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:25 PM +0200 Mark Martinec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since debug mode works, it's hard to gather data on why children won't
fork. Any thoughts?
Was the above strace/truss collected with an -f option?
If not, it should be, as apparently the problem is in a
We are running Postfix + amavisd-new-2.3.3-3 in our linux mail gateway.
We have been hit hard lately with SPAM and our mail queue has been
growing significantly to 10,000+ mails and it takes a few hours for the
queue to go down. We received 1.6million spam messages last month and I
believe
Bernd Probst wrote:
Increasing the number of $max_servers should increase throughput as long as
enough memory is.
Tha usual bottleneck when SpamAssassin is in play is the available CPU.
Increasing $max_servers only increases througput up to the point
where CPU is saturated.
Since you already
Juan,
BDB no env: No such file or directory No such file or directory at
/usr/local/sbin/amavisd-agent line 150.
exited
The error is due to amavisd ignoring my $db_home setting in
amavisd.conf. It also ignores the command line '-D' switch.
When hardcoding amavisd-agent then it runs
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:45:16PM +1000, Christian Purnomo wrote:
...
We were hit with 65k spam messages between the 6 hours between 00:00am
06:00am this morning, by the time business starts, the mail queue was
already soaring up to around 19k around 9am. I was watching the mail
queue
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:28:09AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
*Probably* you have something in the SpamAssassin or ClamAV processing
phase causing the processes to bog down. (Assuming you're using
ClamAV.)
P.S. Two more thoughts:
* I second the suggestions already posted to help identify
Mark Martinec wrote:
Ricardo,
Trying to figure out how to add something like score_sender_maps but
this is to block or soft outbound email recipient addresses...
IE something like the following that I can add in an file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +15
Or otherwise, is the only way to do it via
can one show me a working table to mysql 4.1.x and above
README.sql-mysql does not work for msgs table
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis bottleneck?
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:51:28AM -0700
Quoting MrC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
: Are your queues filled with bounce messages because you are accepting
: mail to unknown recipients? Are you rejecting unknown recipients at the
: first postfix instance.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 09:01:05AM +1000, Christian Purnomo wrote:
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis bottleneck?
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:51:28AM -0700
Quoting MrC ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
: Are your queues filled with bounce messages because you are accepting
: mail to unknown recipients?
Christian Purnomo wrote:
: Are your queues filled with bounce messages because you are accepting
: mail to unknown recipients? Are you rejecting unknown recipients at the
: first postfix instance.
HI MrC
Yes, more than 50% of the emails in the queue are Non-delivery type
email. This
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
can one show me a working table to mysql 4.1.x and above
README.sql-mysql does not work for msgs table
CREATE TABLE `msgs` (
`mail_id` varchar(12) NOT NULL default '',
`secret_id` varchar(12) default '',
`am_id` varchar(20) NOT NULL
Thanks Clifton,
I agree that we need a *way* to stop the NDR from mailer daemon, at
present I have 11155 requests pending in the mail queue from Mailer
Daemon.
I have done some testing re option #2 below, it seems that MS Exchange
2003 does not 'reject non-existent user' upon probing hence I
On 6/23/08, Christian Purnomo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have done some testing re option #2 below, it seems that MS Exchange
2003 does not 'reject non-existent user' upon probing hence I have to
cross this out (unless I'm wrong on this). I tested this by doing a few
test injections to the
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, James Bourne wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
can one show me a working table to mysql 4.1.x and above
README.sql-mysql does not work for msgs table
You know I just realized, this was for amavis 2.5.3 not 2.6.
Sorry about that.
Regards
James
--
James
HI Mark,
Thanks for your very insightful reply
Spot on - CPU has been relatively high when the delay happens. As per
your guess, the swap is hardly used based on the following vmstat
output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/postfix # vmstat 5
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io
Christian Purnomo wrote:
Spot on - CPU has been relatively high when the delay happens. As per
your guess, the swap is hardly used based on the following vmstat
output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/postfix # vmstat 5
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
Sorry, please find below the output of amavisd-agent:
entropy STR 3UCi9dvCpQ
sysContact STR
sysDescrSTR amavisd-new-2.3.3 (20050822)
sysLocation STR
sysName STR mailhost.mydomain.com
sysObjectID OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.15312.2.1
sysServices INT 64
sysUpTime
Thanks Gary,
this is what I was looking for, I have little knowledge about exchange
and is still in the process of learning as I go.
I can get hard 5XX error on my primary domain below (mydomain1.com) and
the Sender Filter seems to kick in as expected.
However when I try to send a random email
25 matches
Mail list logo
