Hello Mark!
I'm implementing DKIM signing into amavisd-new and I am quite successful
until now. Everything works just fine.
But can I avoid entering hundrets of domains into the amavis
configuration file by reading the domains out of a text file with
read_hash?
Yes, but not with read_hash.
Hi,
I am trying to include access to port 10024 from different host by
$inet_socket_port = [10024,10039,9998]; # listen on this local TCP port(s)
$inet_socket_bind = undef; # all interfaces
@inet_acl = qw(127.0.0.1 [::1] 10.8.69.10 10.8.69.20 10.8.131.10);
But when I try the
Hello all,
I noticed that a test mail to autorespond+d...@dk.elandsys.com brings back
a positive result:
DKIM Signature validation: pass
DKIM Author Domain Signing Practices: dkim=unknown
Is there a bug in the testkeys feature of amavis?
Kindest regards,
Martin
Looking at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#dkim
should *...@googlemail.com be defined for both the whitelist_from_dkim and
def_whitelist_from_dkim ?
Alan
--
Hello,
I tried to uncomment [ qr'^\.(zip|rar|arc|arj|zoo)$'= 0 ],
in amavisd.conf , but it still can receive any zip attached file.
Thanks
Yahoo!香港提供網上安全攻略，教你如何防範黑客! 請前往 http://hk.promo.yahoo.com/security/ 了解更多!
Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
From release notes:
(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
your DKIM public keys, you may need to upgrade Perl module
Hello Mark!
Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
From release notes:
(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
your DKIM public keys, you may need to upgrade Perl
Looking at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#dkim
should *...@googlemail.com be defined for both the whitelist_from_dkim and
def_whitelist_from_dkim ?
More like blacklist_from_dkim if they had it.
You can add anything you want to local.cf, but no sure if I would
Alan,
Looking at http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#dkim
should *...@googlemail.com be defined for both the whitelist_from_dkim and
def_whitelist_from_dkim ?
Thanks. You are right, it should not be in both.
I removed it from whitelist_from_dkim and left it in
So port and package maintainers should no longer have an excuse
not to upgrade their port/package to the current official release
of Mail-DKIM-0.33.
See: http://cpan.perl.org/authors/id/J/JA/JASLONG/
Michael Scheidell wrote:
PR Added for freebsd.
If you need patches for freebsd sooner
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:19:55 +0100 Martin Sebald mseb...@hot-chilli.net
wrote:
Hello Mark!
Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
From release notes:
(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your
Mark Martinec wrote:
Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
From release notes:
(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
your DKIM public keys, you may need to
Yes Bill, I can confirm that 0.33 is available from CPAN cause I just
did it this morning after reading Mark's notes.
Mark Martinec wrote:
Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
From release notes:
Patrick Wong wrote:
Yes Bill, I can confirm that 0.33 is available from CPAN cause I just
did it this morning after reading Mark's notes.
Not for me. Just now tried again:
cpan[1] install Mail::DKIM
CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.18)
Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata
Database was generated
Hello Mark!
Martin Sebald wrote:
Ah great!
I'll try to motivate the package maintainer to upgrade to 0.33. ;-)
Thank you guys!
My bug report / release wish was closed this evening and a new Debian
package with version 0.33 was announced and is about to be uploaded to the
archive.
It should
Hello,
I tried to uncomment [ qr'^\.(zip|rar|arc|arj|zoo)$'= 0 ],
in amavisd.conf , but it still can receive any zip attached file.
Amavisd-new version: 2.5.4-1.el4.rf
Thanks
Yahoo!香港提供網上安全攻略，教你如何防範黑客! 請前往 http://hk.promo.yahoo.com/security/ 了解更多!
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Need Coffee need.cof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Martinec
mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote:
It claims to have found an entry for u...@example.com w/o IP address
(ip=none, I assume)
Yes, that would normally be an:
Hmmm, is Jason possibly still working on the 0.33 release? From the
link you posted above:
Mail-DKIM-0.33.tar.gz 10-Mar-2009 07:57 74K
Mail-DKIM-0.33_5.tar.gz 10-Mar-2009 08:07 74K
Mail-DKIM-0.33_6.tar.gz 10-Mar-2009 08:22 74K
No, it's just his style of numbering versions.
Need Coffee,
For the archives because I think it is solved:
Even with amavisd you apparently have to configure trusted_networks
for SA.
Indeed.
I now have in local.cf the following which matches amavisd.conf's
@mynetworks:
clear_internal_networks
internal_networks 127/8
Mark Martinec wrote:
No, it's just his style of numbering versions.
The 0.33_6 will become 0.34 when released,
just as 0.32_6 now became a 0.33.
The 0.33_6 is dropping support for pre-standard DKIM.
Yes, I see that now. I forced a cpan database update and was able to
install 0.33.
Thanks
20 matches
Mail list logo
