Hello again,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:13:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Matt,
I think I have done it correctly this time.
Ok, this looks better now.
[snip lots of good stuff]
Thankyou so much for all of
Hi Mark,
The version of amavisd-new should not have any effect on SpamAssassin scores.
Use the same version of SpamAssassin and the same set of rules
(like SARE rules, same sa-update channels, local.cf, *.pre,
bayes db, awl, ...).
I now have a setup on a non-production server with same
Is it possible someone could take a look at my debug output and see
if there is something I'm missing?
Output from amavisd-new debug-sa
Output from spamassassin -D -t msg
In the first case an empty message came to SpamAssassin.
See amavisd log if the message was also empty when it came to
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:23:13PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Is it possible someone could take a look at my debug output and see
if there is something I'm missing?
Output from amavisd-new debug-sa
Output from spamassassin -D -t msg
In the first case an empty message came to
Matt,
I think I have done it correctly this time.
Ok, this looks better now.
Here are some noteworthy differences:
[64986] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 spam(s) in bayes DB 200
[64986] dbg: config: score set 1 chosen.
versus:
[40259] dbg: config: score set 3 chosen.
Since
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:53:28PM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
Matt,
I think I have done it correctly this time.
Ok, this looks better now.
[snip lots of good stuff]
Thankyou so much for all of that information. I will study it and make
the changes to my configuration.
Matt
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:44:23AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:57:53AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:17:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:48:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I have a problem
Matt,
Unfortunately the problem system is the one currently in production so I
will experiment elsewhere. I have downgraded the spamassassin on my
standalone system and it is still producing dramatically different
results. I will try installing same version of amavis on that system
with no
Hello list,
Forgive me if this has come up before, I did try searching the archives
but found it extremely tricky to get the correct search and have found
no useful information.
I have a problem whereby a lot of spamassassin checks do not appear to
be happening when mail goes through amavis. One
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:48:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
Forgive me if this has come up before, I did try searching the archives
but found it extremely tricky to get the correct search and have found
no useful information.
I have a problem whereby a lot of
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:17:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:48:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Forgive me if this has come up before, I did try searching the archives
but found it extremely tricky to get the correct search and have found
no useful
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:57:53AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:17:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 12:48:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I have a problem whereby a lot of spamassassin checks do not appear to
be happening
12 matches
Mail list logo
