Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:26 AM Damian wrote:
> However, I don't want spam checks for the bcc-user email to be bypassed. I
> also don't want the spam that would be quarantined for the regular sender
> to be delivered for the bcc-user either.
>
> In other words, I want the bcc-user to be
However, I don't want spam checks for the bcc-user email to be bypassed. I
also don't want the spam that would be quarantined for the regular sender
to be delivered for the bcc-user either.
In other words, I want the bcc-user to be treated exactly the same as mail
for the intended recipient. Is
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 5:03 PM Damian wrote:
> > Yes, that's correct - I've always used postfix always_bcc and didn't
> realize there was one for amavis as well.
>
> If you want to keep it that way, you could declare bcc-user a spam_lover:
>
> > @spam_lovers_maps = ([
>
> >
Hi,
> Yes, that's correct - I've always used postfix always_bcc and didn't
> realize there was one for amavis as well.
>
> If you want to keep it that way, you could declare bcc-user a spam_lover:
>
> > @spam_lovers_maps = ([
>
> > 'bcc-u...@gambit.example.com',
> > ]);
>
Should I be able to
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:18 PM Damian wrote:
> Here's a pastebin from an email similar to the above where one of the
> recips is whitelisted while the other is quarantined (using
> report_json).https://pastebin.com/8i6qwjvM
>
> The paste shows
>
> "rcpt_to": [
>
Yes, that's correct - I've always used postfix always_bcc and didn't realize
there was one for amavis as well.
If you want to keep it that way, you could declare bcc-user a spam_lover:
@spam_lovers_maps = ([
Hi,
> Here's a pastebin from an email similar to the above where one of the
>> recips is whitelisted while the other is quarantined (using
>> report_json).https://pastebin.com/8i6qwjvM
>>
>> The paste shows
>>
>> "rcpt_to": [
>> "bcc-u...@gambit.example.com" ,
>> "hartm...@tenney.com"
>> ],
>>
Here's a pastebin from an email similar to the above where one of the
recips is whitelisted while the other is quarantined (using report_json).
https://pastebin.com/8i6qwjvM
The paste shows
"rcpt_to": [
"bcc-u...@gambit.example.com",
"hartm...@tenney.com"
],
which is surprising, as I would
Hi,
> I was using the hash-type arrays. Would something like this work for the
>
> hash array to represent any sender at this domain?
>
> '.email.avi-8.com' => -100.0,
>
> Yes, but I was under the impression that you wanted to match VERP-style
>
I was using the hash-type arrays. Would something like this work for the
hash array to represent any sender at this domain?
'.email.avi-8.com' => -100.0,
Yes, but I was under the impression that you wanted to match VERP-style
sender addresses,
HI,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:13 AM Damian wrote:
> I've just started using sender_maps instead of the welcomelist in
> spamassassin directly and have a few questions. Here is my current
> sender_map:
>
> Is this `@score_sender_maps`?
>
Yes, correct.
>'.gtenney.com' => [{
I've just started using sender_maps instead of the welcomelist in
spamassassin directly and have a few questions. Here is my current
sender_map:
Is this `@score_sender_maps`?
'.gtenney.com' => [{ '.*@send.undone.com' => -100.0,
Hi,
I've just started using sender_maps instead of the welcomelist in
spamassassin directly and have a few questions. Here is my current
sender_map:
'.gtenney.com' => [{ '.*@send.undone.com' => -100.0,
'.*@mg-d0.substack.com' => -100.0,
13 matches
Mail list logo
