g
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Kai-Heng Feng
> >
> > Subject: RE: Expecting to revert commit 55285e21f045 "fbdev/efifb: Release
> > PCI device ..."
> >
> > [Public]
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Linus Torvalds
> > >
gt;>> From: Deucher, Alexander
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 12:01 PM
> >>> To: Linus Torvalds ; Imre Deak
> >>> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Kai-Heng Feng
> >>>
> >>> Subje
PM
>>> To: Linus Torvalds ; Imre Deak
>>> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Kai-Heng Feng
>>>
>>> Subject: RE: Expecting to revert commit 55285e21f045 "fbdev/efifb: Release
>>> PCI device ..."
>>>
>>> [Public]
&g
g
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Kai-Heng Feng
> >
> > Subject: RE: Expecting to revert commit 55285e21f045 "fbdev/efifb: Release
> > PCI device ..."
> >
> > [Public]
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Linus Torvalds
> > >
[Public]
> -Original Message-
> From: Deucher, Alexander
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 12:01 PM
> To: Linus Torvalds ; Imre Deak
> ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Kai-Heng Feng
>
> Subject: RE: Expecting to revert commit 55285e21f045 &qu
edesktop.org>
> Subject: Re: Expecting to revert commit 55285e21f045 "fbdev/efifb: Release
> PCI device ..."
>
> [ Adding back in more amd people and the amd list, the people Daniel added
> seem to have gotten lost again, but I think people at least saw my original
> re
[Public]
> -Original Message-
> From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 5:05 PM
> To: Imre Deak
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; Deucher, Alexander
> ; Kai-Heng Feng
>
> Subject: Re: Expecting to revert commit 55285e21f045 "fbdev/efifb: Release
> PCI
[ Adding back in more amd people and the amd list, the people Daniel
added seem to have gotten lost again, but I think people at least saw
my original report thanks to Daniel ]
With "amdgpu.runpm=0", things are better, but not perfect. With that I
can lock the screen, and it has to go through
Good morning guys,
first of all get better soon Linus.
I'm unfortunately not the best expert for runtime power management
(Alex) nor display (Harry), but from the lack of their response I guess
that they are already on vacation. So maybe take everything I explain
here with a grain of salt.
Adding more amdgpu folks.
Smells like this runtime pm leak is papering over an issue in the
amdgpu driver. Other bug reports are also only about amdgpu.ko it
seems, would an unconditional pm_runtime_get_sync() in
amdgpu_pci_probe() also work? If you do it before the
10 matches
Mail list logo
