On 2018-07-24 02:47 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 23.07.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>>
>>> The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
>>> be deferred to a workqueue.
>>>
>>> Also, we
Am 23.07.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer
The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
be deferred to a workqueue.
Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now, so not really
important
Hi
I was hitting this
Feel free to add my tested by
Tested-by: Mike Lothian
Cheers
Mike
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 at 17:50 Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > From: Michel Dänzer
> >
> > The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> From: Michel Dänzer
>>
>> The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
>> be deferred to a workqueue.
>>
>> Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now,
On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer
>
> The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
> be deferred to a workqueue.
>
> Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now, so not really
> important anymore to fix code doing this.
>
>
From: Michel Dänzer
The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to
be deferred to a workqueue.
Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now, so not really
important anymore to fix code doing this.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer
---
