Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_IB_FLAG_GET_START_SYNCOBJ to expose scheduled fence

Am 29.01.19 um 22:54 schrieb Marek Olšák: On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:01 AM Christian König > wrote: Am 28.01.19 um 22:52 schrieb Marek Olšák: > From: Marek Olšák mailto:marek.ol...@amd.com>> > > Normal syncobjs signal when an IB finishes.

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_IB_FLAG_GET_START_SYNCOBJ to expose scheduled fence

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:01 AM Christian König < ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am 28.01.19 um 22:52 schrieb Marek Olšák: > > From: Marek Olšák > > > > Normal syncobjs signal when an IB finishes. Start syncobjs signal when > > an IB starts. > > That approach has quite a number of

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_IB_FLAG_GET_START_SYNCOBJ to expose scheduled fence

Am 29.01.19 um 14:32 schrieb Marek Olšák: On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 3:01 AM Christian König mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com> wrote: Am 28.01.19 um 22:52 schrieb Marek Olšák: > From: Marek Olšák mailto:marek.ol...@amd.com>> > > Normal syncobjs signal when an IB finishes. Start syncobjs

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_IB_FLAG_GET_START_SYNCOBJ to expose scheduled fence

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 3:01 AM Christian König < ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com wrote: > Am 28.01.19 um 22:52 schrieb Marek Olšák: > > From: Marek Olšák > > > > Normal syncobjs signal when an IB finishes. Start syncobjs signal when > > an IB starts. > > That approach has quite a number of

Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: add AMDGPU_IB_FLAG_GET_START_SYNCOBJ to expose scheduled fence

Am 28.01.19 um 22:52 schrieb Marek Olšák: From: Marek Olšák Normal syncobjs signal when an IB finishes. Start syncobjs signal when an IB starts. That approach has quite a number of problems (for example you can't allocate memory at this point). Better add a flag that we should only sync