Am 16.09.2016 um 11:02 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
Hi Christian,
On 09/16/2016 06:49 PM, Christian König wrote:
NAK, that is clearly an API breakage.
It should have never been typedef'ed in the first place. Does that mean
we would have to bump version for API change? What is the procedure
Hi Christian,
On 09/16/2016 06:49 PM, Christian König wrote:
> NAK, that is clearly an API breakage.
It should have never been typedef'ed in the first place. Does that mean
we would have to bump version for API change? What is the procedure there?
>
> BTW: Why would we want to stop hiding the
NAK, that is clearly an API breakage.
BTW: Why would we want to stop hiding the type?
Christian.
Am 16.09.2016 um 10:46 schrieb Edward O'Callaghan:
Oops, turns out I mailed to dri-devel by mistake so resending here.
The following series fixes up libdrm/amdgpu such that to not hide
a pointer
